2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumLatest released poll all but confirms that the "Sanders Surge" is over:
From Huffington Pollster:
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-national-democratic-primary
Fox (9/20-9/22) Clinton 44, Sanders 30, Biden 18
Previous:
Fox (8/11-8/13) Clinton 49, Sanders 30, Biden 10
Clinton dropped only 5 points with Biden gaining 8 points. Sanders is stagnant.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)down 5.......we will see after the debate
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Biden is rising.....hardly a good sign for Hillary
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Is he officially in, or still "testing the waters"?
Last I read he was waiting to a bit later in the fall to declare.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Biden is rising with very little effort......
The first debate will tell us a lot.
George II
(67,782 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)neverforget
(9,436 posts)the better or worse for any of the candidates.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I think it is Iowa
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)It would just be a waste of time
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)ram2008
(1,238 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....
It takes 2242 delegates to win the nomination.
That leaves only 2230 to go!
Brock Kentman
(48 posts)Superdelegates only get one vote each and can switch at any point.
jfern
(5,204 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)In ten months her support will be zero (actually -1) while Sanders will still be at 30.
You want to draw silly ass conclusions from polls? Others can do that too.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)that starts in about three weeks.
surge wont quite cover it.
people who wanted to end this race before it began will be ended first.
hows it go? by their own petard?
pa28
(6,145 posts)Every time I read a reasoned analysis on DU explaining why Sanders' poll numbers have peaked they only seem to rise further against Clinton's.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I don't think hes a national candidate. He still has very little appeal to the base of the democratic party.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Not everyone considers the base the 1% donors that you seem to be measuring that he has little appeal with!
artislife
(9,497 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)And they were wrong, too.
Bonhomme Richard
(9,000 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)not so much for Hillary, who's plummet will continue.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)weeks before the first debate and months before the first vote....
whatever will we do?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)At which point he will quickly overtake her.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)Sanders has more than achieved what he needed to at this stage of the race. He established himself as far more than the "protest" or "fringe" candidate that some wanted to box him in as. He raised significant amounts of money enabling him to hire substantial field staff in some of the early states. He has mobilized a large army of volunteers working on his behalf. He is ow WAY ahead in NH. What happens if he has a strong debate performance in a few weeks?
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)I hope you are right!
ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)The only polls that matter are the ones that show Bernie in the lead. Haven't you read the rules around here?
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)assholes and quicksanders. You can always go there.
ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)Quicksanders? What is that? I don't recall calling Bernie folks that OR assholes. So let me understand this ... it's FINE for Bernie supporters to attack every poll in support of Hillary, but not the same when there is a pro-Hillary poll. Please provide me with the rules so I'll make sure to print them out and and find just the right place to stick them.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)ronnykmarshall
(35,356 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
George II
(67,782 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)One may not post good Hillary polls in any DU forum. I think the new rule came with the new overlords.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)well with poor me posts. Tell people why you want her, not moan about polls that really don't count until after the first debate. Truly.
Brock Kentman
(48 posts)All indications she'll crash and burn, just like she did in 2008. No nomination path for Clinton at all, and she lost it a long time ago.
George II
(67,782 posts)I suppose every national poll since last year showing her in front by about a 2-1 margin aren't "good polls"?
2008? You're comparing Sanders to Obama?
Brock Kentman
(48 posts)Have you been paying attention to the polls? It's no longer a 2-1 margin.
Bernie is up 16 points in NH, and narrowing his gap elsewhere. It'll skyrocket after October 13th, and will remain there. It only solidifies what people hear and see about Bernie.
Clinton has already hit her ceiling, and has been on a steady decline. Three months ago, Clinton had a comfortable lead that is now down to under 20% margin, and still decreasing DAILY.
October 13th will be Clinton's final solid lead on all polls.
Oh, interesting factoid that's out there.. Bernie's support: 98% is because they like Bernie. the other 2% is because they don't like Hillary. And he's still unknown at 45%. Still plenty of upside. Ready to debate on the issues yet?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And shrinking every month. She's losing momentum.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)She has momentum... in the wrong direction.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)he and his supporters aren't anti-Hillary!
LO freakin L
I guess Bernie has never been to the Bernie Ungerground!
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Which is perfectly fine.
Would be little more interesting, IMO, to discuss Clinton's and Sanders' policy positions, but that doesn't seem to be a topic Clinton supporters want anything to do with.
GeorgeGist
(25,319 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)kenn3d
(486 posts)On Sept 10th Biden's composite leveled off (20.0 then-20.8 now).
During the 2 week period since, as Biden's numbers remained steady:
Clinton's composite avg has fallen another 5.3 pts
Sanders' composite avg has risen 3.2pts
And Clinton's lead over Sanders has fallen 4.8pts from 19.5 to 14.7 (a new all-time low).
See the RCP Composite chart here:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html
I really don't think this confirms much of anything, but it surely does NOT confirm "Sanders Surge" is over.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Bernie campaign is just starting
2007.....
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)even though he has yet to announce. It's interesting that despite the unlikelihood of him announcing another run, he still out-polls all but 2 of the declared D candidates, and he even out-polls BS in a few polls. I know it's tough for him to run especially after the death of his son, but if he ran, he'd get my vote for sure.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)riversedge
(70,188 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)against his own ceiling.
Hes got the fringe democratic/green/independent/republican playing dirty tricks/white upper middle class votes. 20, 25% maybe.
Hillary's got the rest including 90% of people choosing Uncle Joe in polls too I bet.
Cmon Super Tuesday! It will put the Bernie "surge" to bed, once and for all.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)then you are making the same basically condescending judgements that corporate media peddles. There is a strong progressive wing in the Democratic Party much broader than your check list, and also much broader than conventional wisdom liked to previously claim. That is why they have already gotten it so wrong about how well Sanders can do. Clinton may well win the nomination, and maybe (maybe not - we will see) she legitimately represents the positions of more Democrats than Sanders does. But "fringe" he is not. Wake up and smell the coffee.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Individual polls are functionally useless as they all have a bias in their projection about weighted samples and such.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Very interesting race. Really excited to see what Biden decides.