2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf Hillary appointed a Wall St. exec to her cabinet, they would find some way to excuse it.
That's the difference.
Yu won't find too many capitalists in the Maduro Government either.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Sanders is a capitalist, I am a capitalist.
That doesn't require serving the Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, Fannie Maes that drove our economy into the pits and rewarding them with further riches.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)He's not even comfortable being called a liberal, so I think capitalist would be out. He says democratic socialist.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)There is not consensus on the meanings of these words
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)I don't.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)His policy proposals are progressive, left liberal, Keynesian, maybe social democratic.
I don't know what he thinks privately about getting rid of capitalism. Some of his early statements were much more socialist and sort of anti-capitalist. And he's got a picture of Eugene Debs hanging in his office. I guess he is a reformist democratic socialist. I assume he has access to a dictionary and encyclopedia and has looked up the meanings of these words and uses them correctly.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Cheese is right that Sanders would rather be called a democratic socialist than a capitalist.
To understand what "democratic socialist" means one has to think about what kind of policy changes are required to set up universal health care, and so on, so they work smoothly from the start. As Sanders says, we have to look at how socialist structures, like universal health care, an universal education system, and so on, have worked in other countries that have tried them.
Because the US is a backward nation in these regards. It is not a world leader in matters of social and civil rights and well-being.
It's good at war, though.
All he thinks is that capitalism should be regulated so it can work to benefit everyone.
AppalachianAmerican
(42 posts)Socializing losses and privatizing gains is their game.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)We cannot know.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)reasonable supposition.
treestar
(82,383 posts)no surprise in the bubble some people are creating for themselves.
uponit7771
(90,323 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)uponit7771
(90,323 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Street to his cabinet.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251623191
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)If I said something like that I would be lying.
It is very unlikely though, especially when compared to probability that Hillary will do exactly that.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)they would find some way to excuse it.
(not that I believe in supernatural entities, I don't)
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)but BS would undoubtedly have at least one pick that would be a "betrayal."
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Other than your own imagination of course.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)There are people who work on Wall Street and are very liberal. Tom Steyer, George Soros, etc.
Yeah we are to accept the utter evil nature of anyone who ever managed anything or made a buck.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)No, not evil, merely the fact that their interests usually do not align with the interests of the average person naturally.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)ahead of the interests of the nation. Odd.
But Bernie would never do anything like that. He's pure as the driven snow!
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I don't think having worked for Wall Street should outright disqualify someone from a cabinet position.