2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSalon: Bernie Sander's Facebook Advantage
Bernie Sanders secret advantage: How dominating Facebook could help him overcome Hillary Clintons financial juggernautAccording to data obtained by Quintly, a social media analytics firm, Sanders presidential campaign page began the day of Saturday, August 22 with 1,197,290 likes to Clintons 1,199,797. By the end of the day, he had 1,218,879 to her 1,205,437. His lead has only increased since then.
Sanders success comes despite some suggestions that the Clinton campaign has been padding its totals on Facebook with purchased likes. Back in April, Vocative, a data mining media site, reported that Clintons presidential campaign page was more popular among Facebook users in Baghdad than any American city. And a further side-by-side comparison of both candidates page data shows that, over the last month, 95% of Sanders growth came from within the United States, while for Clinton that number is only 74%.
Whether or not her campaign bought followers directly, there is a precedent for an organization led by Hillary Clinton purchasing Facebook likes: the State Department spent $630,000 on them between 2011 and 2013, when she was secretary of state, according to an inspector generals report.
By leveraging his fans enthusiasm and engagement, Sanders is able to circumvent one of Clintons biggest strengths: her advertisement budget. Where other campaigns would pay Facebook thousands of dollars for a suggested post to appear on users timelines, Sanders fans are doing this for free. If this level of engagement keeps up, by the end of his campaign Sanders could wind up saving hundreds of thousands of dollars. Money that the super PAC-disavowing candidate desperately needs.
Wait, what? The State Department spent $630,000 on likes? Seriously?
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)portlander23
(2,078 posts)If they spent that much money on likes, I have some World of Warcraft gold to sell them and a Pokemon ranch they can lease.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)(Since its publication in April, of course, Bernie announced and the Bernie phenomenon hit Twitter.)
Its Not Who Follows Hillary Clinton, It's How She Uses Them
Political Twitter followers are largely useless filler according to Obama's re-election architect
By James King and Vocativ
"Hillary Clintons inevitable presidential campaign is now official, and the former secretary of state heads into battle with a Twitter army of 3.2 million followers and counting. The other two declared candidates, Republican senators Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, have 432,000 and 539,000 followers respectively. On a bar chart (see below), it looks like a huge gap but in reality, it may mean absolutely nothing.
A study of Twitter use during the 2012 campaign suggested that only a tiny subset of followers were of any value. The study, published in December by Daniel Kreiss, an assistant professor at the University of North Carolinas School of Journalism and Mass Communication, found that Twitter is used in political campaigns primarily to influence journalists and an elite core of supporters.
Most likely not one thing we did on Twitter persuaded any voter or even necessarily reached any undecided voters, Teddy Goff, President Obamas digital director in the 2012 campaign, said in the study, but it reached the somewhat elite core of supporters and then, very importantly, reached reporters as well.
[link:http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/it-s-not-who-follows-hillary-clinton-it-s-how-she-uses-them/|
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)addressing issues that matter to voters.