2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI can understand why the polls ask how Hillary would do against the republican candidates, but why
do they not do the same thing with Bernie? In other words match up how Bernie would do against the republican candidates. He is number 2 in the polls. Biden is NOT number two, and until he announces, he shouldn't even be included in these polls. Unlike Hillary and Bernie, they have spoken out on what their policies would be. It cannot be assumed that Biden would follow the policies of the Obama administration. In fact, his opposition to the raid against bin Laden represents a difference, and examining his record is no measure where he stands now. For example, he was against the first gulf war, but was for the second gulf war, and in fact voted for the IWR. So unless he announces, and introduces himself as his own person, including him in polls is just nonsense.
These media sponsored polls might just as well poll the current candidates against an unnamed candidate. It makes about as much sense
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Biden is indeed #2 in the polls.
still_one
(92,168 posts)Autumn
(45,058 posts)even if it causes the democratic party to fail. That's my opinion. YMMV
still_one
(92,168 posts)consultants are behind a lot of this, because they know they will be out of a job in 2016, and they need to find a new gig
I do agree with you to the degree that MSM has been minimizing Bernie's presence, but that most likely will change after the first debate
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
Uncle Joe
(58,354 posts)mak3cats
(1,573 posts)...Bernie polls as well or better than Hillary against the GOP candidates, at least in the polls in which he's been included.
still_one
(92,168 posts)I mentioned, they have included Biden's position against the republicans far more times than Bernie.
To your initial comment that they do it, but don't have to report it, then they are intentially distorting the poll
mak3cats
(1,573 posts)...they report the results when he's included, but more often than not Bernie's left out. For instance, in the latest NBC News / Wall Street Journal poll, both HRC and Biden were polled against Trump, Carson, Bush and Fiorina. Bernie was only polled against Trump.
The results?
Clinton 49, Trump 39 (Clinton +10)
Clinton 44, Fiorina 45 (Fiorina +1)
Clinton 45, Bush 44 (Clinton +1)
Clinton 45, Carson 46 (Carson +1)
Biden 56, Trump 35 (Biden +21)
Biden 47, Fiorina 41 (Biden +6)
Biden 48, Bush 40 (Biden +8)
Biden 49, Carson 41 (Biden +8)
Sanders 52, Trump 36 (Sanders +16)
Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/
still_one
(92,168 posts)mak3cats
(1,573 posts)Clinton 45, Trump 43 (Clinton +2)
Clinton 42, Bush 44 (Bush +2)
Clinton 42, Carson 49 (Carson +7)
Clinton 43, Fiorina 44 (Fiorina +1)
Biden 51, Trump 40 (Biden +11)
Biden 46, Bush 41 (Biden +5)
Biden 45, Carson 45 (Tie)
Biden 46, Fiorina 43 (Biden +3)
Sanders 47, Trump 42 (Sanders +5)
Sanders 44, Bush 44 (Tie)
Sanders 39, Carson 49 (Carson +10)
Sanders 43, Fiorina 44 (Fiorina +1)
Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/
Wait a minute! The main argument against Bernie these days seems to be his "electability" (He can't win! He can't win! The sky is falling! He can't win!). These polls results show who's more electable than who, at least at this point. (And don't forget that Bernie's name recognition is much lower than the other two - as his name recognition goes up, the poll numbers have been as well.)
jeff47
(26,549 posts)He started doing about as well or better than Clinton.
And then a lot fewer polls kept asking those questions.
still_one
(92,168 posts)Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)The opposition is all the media/MSM. All the so called news is owned by the same people who support Republicans.
still_one
(92,168 posts)brooklynite
(94,503 posts)Pollsters have a limited window to ask questions before they lose the attention of the respondent, and every extra candidate add a multipler vs. the 3-4 likely Republicans, so they prioritize. And the conventional wisdom, even among progressive candidates that I know, is that Clinton is likely to be the nominee (Sanders is ahead in -1- State and competitive in -1- other). So pollsters (including D-leaning pollsters like PPP) are currently focusing on Clinton for head-to-head until conditions change.
still_one
(92,168 posts)subtle way to push poll by involving someone who may not even run
I appreciate you explanation, and I can understand why Hillary is involved, but lately including how an undeclared Biden competes over a declared Bernie against republicans, feels to me that they want to influence the results of the poll. In the case of Hillary, they want to portray a loss of support for her, and in the case of Bernie they want to ignore him.
While I agree with you regarding the conventional wisdom, pollsters are also a business, and I suspect that rather than being concerned about "every extra candidate adding a multiplier, verse the 3-4 likely republicans, I think it is to generate business. If it appears it is a close race with Biden included, it will generate more exposure, and thus more sponsorship.
I also wonder if there are media outlets that request a particular pollster, if they have input who to include in the poll.
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)That is my opinion, and once you see one, first determine what the purpose is, and look at the questions, and especially question the combined polls where they are lumping unlike questions.
brooklynite
(94,503 posts)Polling CAN be used to shape opinion; show me any evidence that the broad collection of polls is intended to.
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)you understand about the use of language to elicit a desired response.
brooklynite
(94,503 posts)...preferably without a "we all know" comment.
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)The polling world is trying to operate around him. The MSN has pretty much collapsed in reaction to Sanders. They now run all these nonsensical bogus 'stories' so they don't have to acknowledge him. MSNBC completely changed their format to pretending he doesn't exist.
It is so pathetic to watch it all unfold. Pathetic how the powers that be overreact to him.
still_one
(92,168 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,354 posts)the general election against the Republican contender.
Thanks for the thread, still_one.