2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDes Moines Register: Hillary Clinton says she wishes super PACs were banned
Des Moines Register: Hillary Clinton says she wishes super PACs were bannedI and others have said were not going to unilaterally disarm while the Republicans and the Koch brothers are out there raising money that they dont even tell you where it came from, the Democratic candidate told hundreds of voters gathered on the sun-dappled lawn of Cornell College.
Clinton was answering a question from Cornell senior Sam Stacy, who asked how she could reconcile her campaigns finances with her calls for reforms.
However, she acknowledged that her cause also is being supported by super PACs, which dont face such limits on donations, although they do report donations. I would hope that we would get to a point where those would no longer be operating, she said. But thats not where we are today, and the bulk of the super PAC money is on the other side with the Republicans.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Super PACs are the only reason she's viable as a candidate. Without them, she would be unelectable.
Kornelio
(31 posts)Imagine my shock.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)It's 61% of voters.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2015/08/27/clinton-hits-lows-on-favorability-trustworthiness-in-poll/
frylock
(34,825 posts)Clinton is opposed Super PACs, but isn't opposed to taking their money.
portlander23
(2,078 posts)In all fairness to Mrs. Clinton, she may be correct that it's not possible to get elected to higher office in America without the backing of the wealthy and large money interests. In this respect Mr. Sanders' candidacy is a test of democracy.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Gandalf: Don't... tempt me Frodo! I dare not take it. Not even to keep it safe. Understand, Frodo. I would use this PAC from a desire to do good... But through me, it would wield a power too great and terrible to imagine.
jkbRN
(850 posts)(HRC please go away)