Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 07:52 PM Oct 2015

Hillary: Was For It "Before She Was Against It": TPP TRADE DEAL!

Hillary Clinton comes out against TPP trade deal
Departure from the Clinton legacy

It's also a departure from the Clinton legacy: It was President Bill Clinton who, two decades ago, signed the first mega-regional pact: the North American Free Trade Agreement.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership was sold by the Obama administration as a way to right NAFTA's mistakes -- particularly by adding chapters requiring improved labor conditions and implementing environmental standards in the countries involved in the deal.

It was also the economic underpinning of the so-called "pivot to Asia" that Clinton had championed as America's top diplomat.But the deal is strongly opposed by liberals -- particularly labor unions that fear it would cause the United States to bleed more jobs and wages to countries that pay workers less.

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders has highlighted his opposition to the deal on the Democratic presidential campaign trail. And a liberal icon, Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, has hammered its inclusion -- like most other trade deals -- of a provision that would allow companies to challenge whether countries' laws and regulations live up to their international trade commitments.

Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley,her Democratic rival in the presidential race who came out against the TPP earlier this year, quickly blasted Clinton's comments.
"Wow, that's a reversal," he said in Washington. "I believe we need to stop stumbling backwards into bad trade deals and Secretary Clinton can justify her own reversal of opinion on this, but I can tell you that I didn't have one opinion eight months ago and switch that opinion on the eve of debates."

Sanders also took a shot at Clinton for waiting to take a position on the deal.

"To be very frank with you, it would have been more helpful to have her on board a few months ago," he said -- a reference to June, when congressional Democrats were attempting to block trade promotion authority legislation that greased the wheels for the the deal's passage on Capitol Hill.


MORE ABOUT THIS AT LINKS:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/07/politics/hillary-clinton-opposes-tpp/index.html
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary: Was For It "Before She Was Against It": TPP TRADE DEAL! (Original Post) KoKo Oct 2015 OP
I'll accept it as a better late than never. At least she's getting pulled Cleita Oct 2015 #1
But, Cleita, How do we know she won't "Sell Us Out" once President? KoKo Oct 2015 #3
She might sell us out once she gets the throne, but at least I hope she doesn't. eom Cleita Oct 2015 #6
Why do you Trust Her? KoKo Oct 2015 #7
I don't trust her. I'm giving her the benefit of the doubt just in case she becomes Cleita Oct 2015 #25
Okay...no problem.. KoKo Oct 2015 #37
Good point, but it won't matter if TPP is passed davidpdx Oct 2015 #32
I don't davidpdx Oct 2015 #33
You will recall she said just a short time ago "U will wait until napi21 Oct 2015 #2
You think she read hundreds or thousands of pages of that Secret Trade Agreement KoKo Oct 2015 #5
Hillary is right to set a high bar for trade agreements. ForwardMotion Oct 2015 #4
Honestly, I don't appreciate your smear of John Kerry. emulatorloo Oct 2015 #8
Yes, it's Flip-Flopper II. Right wing nonsense. Press picks it up and runs with it, idiots follow. betsuni Oct 2015 #34
"To be very frank with you, it would have been more helpful to have her on board a few months ago"nt slipslidingaway Oct 2015 #9
Very True! KoKo Oct 2015 #11
Sometimes, without knowing all the minute details, one must decide if they might be for something .. slipslidingaway Oct 2015 #17
Duplicate glitch.. KoKo Oct 2015 #12
I wonder where I've heard that phrasing before... NuclearDem Oct 2015 #10
The OP's title, while sensational, is an illogical assertion. procon Oct 2015 #13
How long has Hillary been a "free agent?" n/t Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #15
Hillary was for it when they were passing fast track authority in the Congress, it's unlikely to be Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #14
That was back when she was a moderate INdemo Oct 2015 #16
Now is time to put her to the test. aspirant Oct 2015 #18
K/r MindfulOne Oct 2015 #19
Stop stating OS might leave DU! Divernan Oct 2015 #35
Her record is clear. AtomicKitten Oct 2015 #20
A mistake??? n/t slipslidingaway Oct 2015 #21
I get it you don't like Hillary. upaloopa Oct 2015 #26
Don't like her record, not one bit & I'm not interested in the cult of personality surrounding her. AtomicKitten Oct 2015 #28
Another instance of "just-in-time evolution" Ino Oct 2015 #30
Well... Metric System Oct 2015 #22
Hillary Clinton's Long Record of Advocacy & Support for the TPP Cheese Sandwich Oct 2015 #23
Specious nonsense about things said years ago Gloria Oct 2015 #24
So was her boss for it???????????????????????? Historic NY Oct 2015 #27
I do not believe what comes out of her mouth. DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2015 #29
And if she get's the nomination Bernblu Oct 2015 #31
Spot on! And welcome to DU! Divernan Oct 2015 #36
And she still isn't unequivocally AGAINST it... mak3cats Oct 2015 #38
K&R! Segami Oct 2015 #39

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
1. I'll accept it as a better late than never. At least she's getting pulled
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 07:55 PM
Oct 2015

in the right direction. I'm still voting for Bernie though.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
3. But, Cleita, How do we know she won't "Sell Us Out" once President?
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:04 PM
Oct 2015

She constantly "Flip Flops" on her Positions and it appears she did this Before the Debate where she would be consistent with her fellow Debaters?

How could ANYONE TRUST HER? She stole Bernie Sanders and O'Mally's Positions to make herself seem more to the LEFT of Dem Party when we ALL KNOW (who've been here for years on DU) that she is very different in her views from either Sanders or O'Malley?

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
25. I don't trust her. I'm giving her the benefit of the doubt just in case she becomes
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 11:37 PM
Oct 2015

Madam President. I have to have hope or I might as well shoot myself.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
37. Okay...no problem..
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 08:23 PM
Oct 2015

I think many of us are exasperated with the political Crazies these days.... so

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
32. Good point, but it won't matter if TPP is passed
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 05:04 AM
Oct 2015

The next president won't be able to stop it. The rabbit hole has already swallowed us and belched out what is left.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
33. I don't
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 05:05 AM
Oct 2015

I think had she opposed it before the fast track vote she could have influenced some of the people in Congress. It is pretty much a done deal now with the massive lobby that will happen to push it through. Too little, too late.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
2. You will recall she said just a short time ago "U will wait until
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 07:57 PM
Oct 2015

I seer what's in the final agreement, and make a decision on it." That's exactly what she did.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
5. You think she read hundreds or thousands of pages of that Secret Trade Agreement
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:08 PM
Oct 2015

in 24 Hours?

Even our Congress Critters couldn't read it ....and remember the Agreement is Secret and can't be revealed in Full until Four Years have Passed and along the way Access was Restricted to the US House and Senate Members who had to go into a closed room...not allowed to take notes...and Staffers were subjected to Background Checks and other TSA type of stuff to get in their to report BACK to their House & Senate Employers to try to get the latest inclusions from Select Senate and House Members who were WRITING THE FUCKING POS TRADE BILL!

It has been a Corporate Written and Approved FIASCO to sell us Workers down the River! Like NAFTA under Bill Clinton.

emulatorloo

(44,116 posts)
8. Honestly, I don't appreciate your smear of John Kerry.
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:15 PM
Oct 2015

I will admit to being in a bad mood today, but we all remember how the right-wing noise machine took Kerry's statement and twisted it to mean something other than what he actually said. As a Democrat, I am not going to embrace right-wing memes against Kerry to score points against HRC.

betsuni

(25,472 posts)
34. Yes, it's Flip-Flopper II. Right wing nonsense. Press picks it up and runs with it, idiots follow.
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 05:15 AM
Oct 2015

Do people want a G.W. Bush? Colbert: "The greatest thing about this man is he's steady. You know where he stands. He believes the same thing Wednesday that he believed on Monday, no matter what happened Tuesday."

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
11. Very True!
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:40 PM
Oct 2015

Where WAS HILLARY in that VOTE that pushed Fast Track for TPP and then the Vote that allowed it to go forward.

Given the Dems did try to hold it back....but, in the end it was a Cave In.

Where WAS HILLARY..... Oh..no...she shows up Just before the First Dem Debate? When her two "Declared Opponents" were Against it Before Her?

Yeah...it's just "Politics" with Hillary....Let's just Ignore This!

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
17. Sometimes, without knowing all the minute details, one must decide if they might be for something ..
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 09:01 PM
Oct 2015

or against something.

Guess I would call that instinct, on the surface and at the moment, is it right or wrong. Should I give this idea pause and state objections, so it might become a better deal and give more time for facts to emerge, or just stay silent.

IMHO you do not get the best deal by being silent. You might invade another country and cause instability in the region by being too hasty and not raising questions. If you are going to raise objections, then one should not wait too long. JMHO.









 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
10. I wonder where I've heard that phrasing before...
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:33 PM
Oct 2015

I have an inkling feeling it was used to attack another Democrat recently.

Oh well, it'll come toREPUBLICANSMEARATTACKONJOHNKERRY me eventually.

procon

(15,805 posts)
13. The OP's title, while sensational, is an illogical assertion.
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:51 PM
Oct 2015

As Secretary of State, Clinton, just like any other Cabinet official under every previous administration, served at the pleasure of the president. Her job was to carry out Obama's policies, not interject her own opinions or countermand his goals. Now that Clinton is a free agent and no longer under the direction of the president, she can make her own decisions and voice her opinions as needs be.

To make the feckless claim that, "she was for it before she was against it" is at best duplicitous and misleading. It serves no other purpose than an effort to deliver a petty gibe at the candidate you oppose and her supporters, assuming of course, that they also do not to know how our government works.




Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
14. Hillary was for it when they were passing fast track authority in the Congress, it's unlikely to be
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:51 PM
Oct 2015

stopped having passed that hurdle.



They first turned on their own party's president when he joined with Republican congressional leaders to push a measure called "trade promotion authority" in June. That legislation -- key to getting other countries to sign off on a final agreement -- allowed Obama to seal the deal and send it to lawmakers for an up-or-down vote with no amendments.

Clinton dismissed that bill as procedural, and said she'd weigh in on the deal once it became final.


http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/07/politics/hillary-clinton-opposes-tpp/index.html



Hillary was just promoting bullshit about the bill as being nothing but "procedural" as if that meant nothing, it's far more than that as fast track authority makes passing the TPP much easier than without it.



Fast-track, or trade promotion authority, will allow the White House to send trade deals to Congress for up-or-down votes. The Senate will not be able to filibuster them, and lawmakers will not have the power to amend them.

The expedited process, which lasts until 2018 and can be extended until 2021, greatly increases Obama’s chances of concluding negotiations on the TPP, which is a top goal of the president’s.


http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/246035-senate-approves-fast-track-sending-trade-bill-to-white-house



Thanks for the thread, KoKo.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
16. That was back when she was a moderate
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:53 PM
Oct 2015

Now she is a progressive liberal.
Don't believe me Just ask Hillary and the WaPO

aspirant

(3,533 posts)
18. Now is time to put her to the test.
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 09:10 PM
Oct 2015

All of her congressional endorsers that voted yes for fast track should be personally visited by Hillary and publicly state they are now voting NO to TPP.

If she doesn't bring the no votes forward we know that this isn't sincere.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
35. Stop stating OS might leave DU!
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 05:32 AM
Oct 2015

I realize you're relatively new, but OS is one of the strongest posters on DU, not some shy violet repairing to his fainting couch! Why do you keep scattering around these claims that "OS might leave DU"? Is that claim anything but your own projection?

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
26. I get it you don't like Hillary.
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 11:58 PM
Oct 2015

By the numbers of Bernie supporters here you are preaching to the choir.

They don't like her either. But I see the need to reinforce each other.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
28. Don't like her record, not one bit & I'm not interested in the cult of personality surrounding her.
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 01:10 AM
Oct 2015

Ino

(3,366 posts)
30. Another instance of "just-in-time evolution"
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 01:50 AM
Oct 2015

Hillary lurches to catch up before her prize slips away

Gloria

(17,663 posts)
24. Specious nonsense about things said years ago
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 11:23 PM
Oct 2015

while the deal now finally done after 8 ...let's spell it for you...E I G H T years, of which half of those years she had nothing to do with it....make it silly to say that things from years ago would apply to the final agreement...

Really, use your brains...You can be against something idealogically and that is very easy....

But experienced people re-evaluate constantly....

Did you like Windows 8 when it came out? Well, I won't hold that against you, because you now like Windows 10...(I don't like either, but that's not the point)....

Did you LOVE Red Baron Pizza until you learned it had 22 gms of fat in 1 slice...Oh, I won't hold it against you if you learned that and changed your mind!

Jeesh!

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
29. I do not believe what comes out of her mouth.
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 01:16 AM
Oct 2015

I do not trust Hillary Clinton.
I do not consider her an honest person.
And yes, this matters very much.

Bernblu

(441 posts)
31. And if she get's the nomination
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 02:51 AM
Oct 2015

She'll be for it after being against it after being for it! This is known as the political hat trick or the three step monte.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
36. Spot on! And welcome to DU!
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 05:38 AM
Oct 2015

All those corporate/banking interests which hold millions and millions of dollars worth of Clinton IOU's, aka campaign donations, aka Clinton Family Foundation donatinos, aka quid pro quos, WILL demand her support for TPP, should she end up in the Oval Office. Their other big call-in will be for Supreme Court nominees who will not overturn Citizens United.

mak3cats

(1,573 posts)
38. And she still isn't unequivocally AGAINST it...
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 08:36 PM
Oct 2015

...just "what she's seen." She left herself wiggle room to be for it again.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary: Was For It "...