Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lucy Goosey

(2,940 posts)
Thu Aug 9, 2012, 09:15 AM Aug 2012

Romney ad: Obama waging ‘war on religion’ (updated)

Last edited Thu Aug 9, 2012, 10:33 AM - Edit history (1)

I think this kind of trash gives us leave to discuss Mitt's religion, no?

Mitt Romney makes an appeal to the Catholic vote with his latest ad, moving away from the economy to talk about health care and contraception.

President Obama has touted newly expanded contraception coverage in ads aimed at women. Now Romney is using the expanded coverage to say the president declared a “war on religion.”

The presumptive Republican nominee’s ad features both former Polish president Lech Walesa and Pope John Paul II — a clear play for the Catholic (and Polish) vote.


Video at link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/romney-obama-waging-war-on-religion/2012/08/09/192c4e02-e213-11e1-a25e-15067bb31849_blog.html

Updated to add this: Think Progress asks a very smart question

Was Romneycare A War On Religion?
As governor, Romney greatly expanded access publicly-financed contraception through his 2006 health care reform law. The state’s Commonwealth Care, established under Romneycare, offers subsidized, low or no-cost insurance to low-income residents and provides primary and preventive care that includes “family planning services” and prescription contraceptives. In 2005, Romney also “signed a bill that could expand the number of people who get family-planning services, including the morning-after pill” and asked the Department of Health and Human Services to require Catholic hospitals to issue the morning after pill to rape victims.

In fact, the Obamacare rule Romney is now characterizing as an affront to religious liberties is very similar to a 2002 state law he tacitly supported. Like more than two dozen states across the country, Massachusetts required insurers that provide outpatient benefits to cover hormone replacement therapy and all FDA-approved contraceptive methods — well before Obamacare became law. The Massachusetts rule exempts “an employer that is a church or qualified church-controlled organization” from the mandate, but prohibits institutions such as hospitals, universities, and nursing homes from deny their employees birth control coverage.


http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/08/09/663091/was-romneycare-a-war-on-religion/

The Obama camp needs to use this.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

brewens

(13,538 posts)
3. Huh? What empire did John Paul and Walesa bring down? I can't be the Soviet Union,
Thu Aug 9, 2012, 09:47 AM
Aug 2012

everyone knows Ronald Reagan did that!

It shows you how stupid these people think their own voters are. We constantly see the "bring this wall down" clip of Reagan. It's probably the most cherished myth in the history of the Republican party. Even bigger that "bush kept us safe from terrorism". Now they can put out a totally conflicting message to convince people Robme gives a shit about their religious freedom. And you know what? That will not even phase most of them. They will believe both somehow.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,392 posts)
4. Neither John Paul nor Walesa
Thu Aug 9, 2012, 09:49 AM
Aug 2012

are running for POTUS.

What do they have to do with this election? Does Mitt see himself as an equal of either man?



"War on religion" seems to have succeeded the much ballyhooed "War on Christmas". When is Mitt saying that the FBI/ATF last raided a church and/or thrown people in jail for practicing their religion? I'm sorry but telling businesses/organizations (with some exemptions) to start covering contraception for their female employees as part of preventative care is NOT conducting a "War on Religion" by any means.

brewens

(13,538 posts)
8. Then they put in the work around that let businesses and organizations off the hook for
Thu Aug 9, 2012, 10:30 AM
Aug 2012

actually having to pay anything to provide contraception. So now we're just preventing them from preventing their female employees from getting contraception.

As usual, if you try and stop religious people from forcing their superstition on others, they claim to be persecuted.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Romney ad: Obama waging ‘...