2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMorning Joe talk today is about how Bernie will lose it in the debate cuz he's "cantankerous."
Why, "everybody" is saying it. Must be true.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)Go Bernie!
Dramato
(39 posts)Quote?
CTyankee
(63,903 posts)he's winning.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Who then DID say that?
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)good for him.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Based on available sources, Sanders has a short fuse, is condescending and doesn't like to be disagreed with. IF true, he'll have to keep those tendencies in check.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)people have had it with being played by blow dried pols spitting out meaningless platitutes while continuing to help the 1% and the mic.
if he is pissed, it only reflects the mood of the people.
he is going to do great precisely because he is not going to smile and wave like he is on a thxgiving day float
RKP5637
(67,104 posts)As you say, "he is not going to smile and wave like he is on a thxgiving day float." He's not on a celebratory tour.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)the coiffed and blow dried "miss america" presentation."
those days are over. people want the truth.
RKP5637
(67,104 posts)for the masses! IMO smiles aren't necessary. As you say, "people want the truth." Not some scripted feel good message. My dad was one of those old time democrats way back. He kicked ass and got things accomplished and didn't smile a lot, but he cared about people, especially those disadvantaged by the system and hucksters and shysters.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)was very ted kennedy like, and i mean that in the most complimentary way. teddy could play nice when he wanted, but he was a bear in the senate, always fighting for the people. he never forgot the struggles of the non elite, and even though he was never mean about it, he didn't mince words either when it came to laying down the lumber and speaking the truth.
i miss him.
RKP5637
(67,104 posts)very very late in life. My dad did very well in life financially, but he never forgot his beginnings and he was always for the little guy. He always always felt a county could only be successful if everyone had opportunities and could share in the wealth of the country. He also believed in highly controlling capitalism so it did not runaway like today. He's sadly long gone now. I recall a very very long time ago when I was just a very tiny kid, he called me into the living room and wanted me to see/hear JFK when he was campaigning, and he said, this is a young man that is going places and is for the people.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)sounds a lot like bernie
RKP5637
(67,104 posts)that is some combination of FDR and JFK. I'm not knocking HRC at all, but some politicians are like window dressing, not referring to HRC. And I look at the republican hopefuls, I am really shocked, is that the best the republican party can do. I find it embarrassing that the world is exposed to the republican presidential hopefuls.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)as for the republicans, i keep thinking of this cover
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)During his debate because he didn't answer any policy questions and basically bashed his opponents. Do not u detest image the voters on both sides.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)even if he is blowing unsubstantiated right wing bigoted smoke up their asses, they love it. Which sadly says as much about the electorate on that side as it does about Trump himself
CTyankee
(63,903 posts)Sanity Claws
(21,846 posts)Maybe the Republicans should get all worried instead.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)What the heck does your partisan face look like?
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Good one.
Meanwhile, I've seen him be cantankerous. I've seen him calm and reasonable in the face of cantankerous.
I'm not worried.
karynnj
(59,501 posts)I suspect that there are more high profile potential nominees (in any election) for whom these things are said than not. It really may be whether they can hold the tendencies in check enough that that they do not become real issues. I suspect - that given that did not even become a real issue with McCain, likely the one with the most severe and most well documented problems on this - that this is unlikely to hurt either Clinton or Sanders.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Bernie once they get to know him is that he SHARES THEIR ANGER at the disaster that has been created by the Status Quo politician, all funded by Corporations, for them many of whom have lost everything, and for their children.
But I'm kind of glad that those who are comfortable and don't have to worry as MOST Americans do, don't understand how ANGRY the people are.moss
Imagine thinking that the losses suffered by so many Americans due to neo-liberal policies, Corporate interference in our politics, is NOT something people asking for our votes, should NOT be angry about?
This is an advantage for Bernie. He is angry about the right things, because HE never lost touch with the people, as most politicians have, the reason why so many people have completely dropped out of the system.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Spoken plainly. So you manufacture outrage.
askew
(1,464 posts)She blew her stack more than a few times in the 2008 campaign and Obama got under her skin repeatedly in their later debates.
I expect CNN to give her softball questions and most of the screentime so it is unlikely we'll she her short fuse.
O'Malley seems to not have those issues. But, I am not sure he has the debate skills to get under Hillary's skin the way Obama did. Obama has an uncommon ability to make his opponents lose their cool.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Bernie is perfect!! Didn't you get the memo?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I think Sanders is too smart to give them one
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)One of the 99
(2,280 posts)Very few people even noticed until the media started playing on a loop for days.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)Ed Muskie was busted because melted snowflakes on his face became "tears".
Pam Schroeder was busted for a similar "teary" episode.
Gore and his "sigh", Dean and his "scream".
Yet the media were strangely quiet when Ronald Reagan was making all sorts of outlandish claims, like "trees cause more pollution than automobiles" and "there are more trees in the US now than there were when the Pilgrims landed".
RKP5637
(67,104 posts)the minds of the idiot factor in this country when they go to vote.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Ill just assume that he is too intelligent to give it to the MSM but time will tell.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)But they can always hope.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)CTyankee
(63,903 posts)or just trying to stir the shit and serve it up like it "is" true...
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)There is a reason he's seriously lacking in congressional endorsements. No one there likes him.
He screams and hollers, Rep. Joe Moakley (D-Mass.) said to the AP at the time, but he is all alone.
Rep. Bill Richardson (D-N.M.) called Sanders a homeless waif.
Said Rep. Barney Frank: Bernie alienates his natural allies. His holier-than-thou attitudesaying in a very loud voice he is smarter than everyone else and purer than everyone elsereally undercuts his effectiveness.
karynnj
(59,501 posts)Richardson had enough ethics problems that he could not withstand the scrutiny needed to be in Obama's cabinet. He also was involved in election shenanigans in 2004 that suppressed the native American vote -- to enhance his own position in NM at the expense of the national ticket. Barney Frank is wonderful, but he certainly does not have a reputation of being easy to work with. In fact, his comments about Bernie could likely be said of himself. Not to mention - his sister, Ann Lewis was an adviser to Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign and I think every campaign since then.
I doubt anyone would describe Bernie as diplomatic, conciliatory, or soft spoken. You might note that these are not the first words used to describe Hillary Clinton either. This is not a bad thing for either in a time when there is a certain amount of impatience and even anger among voters. It may be the rough sides that both of these people have will be what helps them rally people to vote for them.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Rather strange what your notion of 'rather strange' is.
karynnj
(59,501 posts)It is pretty clear that is the new attack on Bernie. I am frankly not impressed -- as one could easily find similar comments on Hillary's behavior. However, Bernie is far less well known - and I think this concerted effort is intended to define him before he gets more national exposure. Not cool.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)karynnj
(59,501 posts)When he first came to the House, the Democrats did not welcome him. It is almost more that environment that is being described than Sanders himself. The entire article DOES provide the context that you didn't include. Sherrod Brown's comments are far more positive. http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/bernie-sanders-2016-democrats-121181
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Leaders who found Sanders... difficult.
karynnj
(59,501 posts)In context, the point is more that he was there - alone - by himself - not a member of either party. It was clear the Democrats did not reach out to him. He was the ONLY independent - so there is no other included independent to point to - to make the case that it was him. The rest of the Politico article makes it clear that he did engage with Democrats - when the Democrats actually wanted to include him and that he was successful getting amendments.
It is interesting that Bernie got about 70% of the vote in VT the last time he won. Vermont, even more than Massachusetts is a state where people expect to meet their Senator (Governor, mayor etc) and they are super accessible. Clearly Bernie is not turning off Vermonters. I have seen him at several town Halls and events -- he has easily handled even hecklers.
Frankly - I would take Sherrod Brown's comments over Barney Frank's or Bill Richardson's - as both Richardson and Frank have their own problems.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)And he is on BoD of a Wall St bank. IOW, he's just another Clinton surrogate doing her dirty work of smearing Sanders.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)a lot.
Naturally status quo politicians are not going to be happy to see what they built over the years for their corporate funders, be challenged by the PEOPLE. It makes them look like bad. As it should. Because it was bad.
Now the people are suffering the results of the policies they supported.
It's not working you know, avoiding talking about the ISSUES with the same old 'politics of personal destruction' which at one time, did work, but now is well known to the public and DESPISED by a majority of them.
So thanks, not a word in your comments about Bernie about the ISSUES, just personal attacks.
We will make sure to draw attention to these personal attacks and the total lack of interest in what the PEOPLE care about.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Response to CTyankee (Reply #16)
Thinkingabout This message was self-deleted by its author.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)eom
demwing
(16,916 posts)When Bernie acts respectfully - as he always does - it will come across as freaking saintly in comparison.
CTyankee
(63,903 posts)that didn't play so now they're on this. Old trick. I don't think it is going to work...
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)It's albatross that Bernie is wearing around his neck
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)The tide is turning on whether socialism is a 'good thing' or a 'bad thing' with the electorate, and Bernie is helping to turn it.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)I guess that makes her a scary socialist, too.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)hate the Left, and they are history. Current generations WANT a Democratic Socialist Government by over 7-3 among voters of this generation.
In fact that old red baiter HELPS Bernie. And of course the same old Cold Warriors say Hillary is a Commie also.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)They rely on everything BUT Hillary saving herself.
frylock
(34,825 posts)askew
(1,464 posts)Bernie got rolled by Michelle Bachmann in a debate but I think he didn't know how to handle her crazy kind of like how Obama didn't know how to handle Romney's insane lying in the first debate. With so few debates, Sanders & O'Malley don't have the luxury of waiting to the second debate to figure out how to deal with Hillary's lying. And she is going to lie a lot.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)For those unaware of what a Gish Gallop is: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Gish%20Gallop
floriduck
(2,262 posts)whatever Bernie says in the debate, he will have had those convictions for many years. And we will not see him change his position based on his audience and what is they want to hear. And I am proud of him for that.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)One of the best things about living on the West Coast is that Morning Joe is over by the time I get up.
CTyankee
(63,903 posts)I think this will be on various places on TV soon. Joe Scar just takes his talking points from the GOP du jour list...
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Actually, the whole panel seems to be taken by themselves.
aidbo
(2,328 posts)I think most people outside of the beltway bubble don't give two shits about what Joe or Mika think.
'Scuse my language.
Fearless
(18,421 posts)RKP5637
(67,104 posts)masses steamrolled by the 1% plus.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)their negatives.
Joe is just being an ass.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)that he knows how to use that word in a sentence.
ok, that was mean.
i feel bad
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)the House and Senate floors delivery one of his passionate speeches and, quite frankly, it's why I have ALWAYS LOVED HIM! That's what attracted me to him - his passion and seriousness about issues important to us, WE THE PEOPLE. I have never seen him even come close to losing his temper on a TeeVee interview nor was he ever "cantankerous."
He's not cantankerous. I KNOW cantankerous! I worked with one of the grouchiest, meanest, rudest, most cantankerous doctors on the planet. Bernie's Nothing like he was.
Faux pas
(14,667 posts)AUTHENTIC, something many, many others are not. They and We know who they are.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Or that he has some inside Washington connections. He's irrelevant.
Otoh all of them have to avoid alienating democrats, the people who are going to nominate them. I predict Jim Webb will say something that overshadows any gaffes the rest of them make.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Debates aren't his thing and there is a track record showing just that. I really think this will put O'Malley front and center. It is his to lose. No one is going to put much on Sanders or Clinton. Everyone knows it isn't where Sanders shines, as he is just going to go off on his regular stump speech, and Clinton will simply be trying to not make a mistake. Big opportunity for O'Malley.
Gothmog
(145,130 posts)I stopped watching this show several years ago and I really do not care one bit as to what Morning Joe thinks
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Gothmog
(145,130 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Yes, that wont go over well with most debate viewers I suspect.
elleng
(130,865 posts)because his polls are so low. It must be true because I read it here!
(Never mind Jimmy Carter in 1975.)
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)Joe is a GOP talking point parrot and Mika's fake 'I'm a liberal' act is wearing thin.
Ino
(3,366 posts)Because every Joe "Dead Intern" Scarborough thread should mention her.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)I wouldn't be surprise if Hillary's debate prep has focused solely on provoking one. Once again, they're all underestimating Bernie's skills and will be sorely disappointed when it doesn't happen.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)The real humor is in guessing what his other choices might have been.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)And I don't see that as a problem anyhow.