2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSander's supporters: What would you do if Bernie ultimately asks you to vote for Hillary?
If Bernie ultimately drops out of the race and/or loses the nomination (and I am not predicting he will), what will you do if he asks you support and vote for Hillary? I ask because if Bernie doesn't win there is every reason to expect him to support Clinton.
aidbo
(2,328 posts)And most Bernie supporters would vote for her, just like most Hillary supporters will vote for Bernie when he's the nominee.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)or Chaffee or O'Malley?
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I will vote for Bernie ... Now Webb or Chaffee? That would be much tougher. If I voted for Chaffee, I think I could/would ride out the term; should I have to vote for Webb, I'd do so and move to somewhere outside of the U.S.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)5 days before the debate Bernie and Sandra Bland's mother (neither knowing the other) were in the same restaurant and the two talked ... and Bernie did what anyone (especially a politician) would do ... express his condolences ... and told her that he would continue saying Sandra's name.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)had seen it. Have a nice day.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)Then you have to throw it in his face...not cool at all.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)a promise he made privately to her family. I am sure a lot of people thought it was a political move.
Unlike Politicians, he didn't really care what people thought.
He made a promise privately and he kept it
This is a rare human being. Any other politician would have made sure that that photo was all over the internet before the debates.
Had it not been for her family, who understood as most people who have ever known him have, what a truly unique person he is, no one would ever have known why he mentioned her name.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Too much has happened on this board for 1Strong to concede a point in regards to Bernie.
And we should respect it.
I think I joined this board long after it started and then it got pretty vile after Net Roots. There just seemed to be a lot of history that kept being implied. There have been a lot of bannishings and I actually saw a list that was posted with names of the outed. I checked out a lot of the posters transperency pages. Some people needed the hides, but I have to admit, 1Strong was not one of them. He got a few hides that were unbelievable and absolutely devoid of anything that could be alert worthy at all.
My feeling is, don't ask anyone to shake off that kind of experience.
I cannot forget the dog whistles of 2008 and H and when someone tries to down play it, or convince me otherwise, I can't. Why? Because it was an experience. I felt a pang go through my heart, especially with Bill. Because I really liked him, and I voted for him twice.
Bernie is a good man. Hopefully, for us, enough people will see it and vote for him in the primaries. We got momentum!
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)to another "swear an oath" thread.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)It is a simple, legitimate question, the answer of which may be important in the general election. If you don't want to reply, don't - pass it by - no one is trying to force anyone to supply an answer. But don't try to weasel out of it by implying that it is a question that is at fault. If you don't want to answer the question, opt out instead of trying to place the blame on the person who asked it. Don't be a whiner.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)CajunBlazer has spoken.
I will answer your Democratic Party loyalty oath request. In the word of Hillary Clinton, no.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)I dislike so many of Hillary's stances on issues - Wall Street, war, H-1B visas, fracking, TPP (she has zippo believe-ability on that and any other "evolving" that I find her candidacy unacceptable to me.
Asking this question now is like saying that the issues do not mean squat. They do mean everything.
I don't think I can vote for another DINO.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... and that we would vote for her anyway, without her changing them or being more definitive in her policies to clarify where we might be able to support her on her less defined viewpoints on issues like this over the course of the primary season.
It's way too early to say she's "ok" for us. We need to be demanding of change in the areas that need change before the primary season is upon us.
randys1
(16,286 posts)pledging loyalty of a vote to a Democrat
it is pledging a vote to prevent rightwing terrorists from destroying human life
It is called the big picture...
djean111
(14,255 posts)There is absolutely no reason to keep asking. None.
And you can keep the blackmail, it does not work. Especially since Hillary is so polarizing that I do not think she can win the GE. Which - would be handing the country to those rightwing terrorists.
randys1
(16,286 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Maybe, just maybe, she is not the candidate we need at this point in time.
djean111
(14,255 posts)She cannot win with her stances on the issues, and her lack of believe-ability. She has the same problems she had last time she ran.
Looks to me like someone is trying to set up a scapegoat - Bernie's supporters - for a loss.
I am a committed Sanders supporter. BECAUSE OF THE ISSUES. Voting for someone with whom I disagree on so many issues is not something I am contemplating. And the constant whine about voting for Hillary is getting ridiculous.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Oooh, maybe Bernie getting over $3mil since the debate? Bernie winning the social media battle?
Or just the fear that Bernie will Obama her?
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)The loyalty oath hasn't been posted for days.
artislife
(9,497 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)which can be answered with a simple "yes" or "no". If you don't want to answer the question - opt out - pass it by. But don't blame the question if you don't want to answer it.
reddread
(6,896 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)brewens
(13,574 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)I will be voting for Bernie in the primary and the general election, even if it means I have to write in his name.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Obviously, I'd rather have Hillary than whoever ends up at the wheel of the Republican clown car...but I don't have to vote for her: my state's electoral votes aren't remotely in play. I can follow my conscience and simply skip that part of the ballot.
Or between now and next November, she could change my mind about what kind of president I think she'd make. As it stands, I'm seeing a business-as-usual corporatist. If I start seeing a progressive, that'd call for a reassessment.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Some lines cannot be crossed.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)So if Clinton's the nominee, I will have the "luxury" of a meaningless vote at the top of the ticket.
Bernblu
(441 posts)Answer that one and I'll answer yours.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)I am in Alabama and since the state will go Republican regardless of how I vote, like others, I have some latitude. However, I always vote and it dang sure won't be for one of the Republicans or some totally meaningless third party candidate who will get less votes than Mickey Mouse.
Bernblu
(441 posts)but knowing that she will do a 180 and many of her progressive positions once she gets in office. But like in your case my vote will not matter because I live in a state that she will win.
enid602
(8,613 posts)I would definitely vote for Bernie, confident that his 'revolution' is hopefully better than the one the other folks have in store for us. If you know what I mean.
musicblind
(4,484 posts)Even if Hillary DIDN'T endorse Bernie I would vote for him if he got the nomination.
I prefer Hillary because I think she has a better chance of winning the general election. I've seen what happens when we try and elect too far to one side before. I don't want to see that happen again.
That doesn't mean I wouldn't love a Bernie presidency.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)Or rather... those that don't vote... Some 35% of this country!... They won't be inspired to turn out.
That's what will happen.
artislife
(9,497 posts)So I will get to sit with my vote for a while and really think about every single name and ballot measure.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Thank you very much!
This idea that support is automatically transferable is more than a little insulting.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)No way my support for Bernie could be transferred to Hillary. They are worlds apart.
840high
(17,196 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)...however to hear them answer that they will not is somewhat odd.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)But I'm not going to do it because Bernie asks me to. I'm more than capable of making my own decisions and your premise IS insulting.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)Last edited Thu Oct 15, 2015, 11:35 PM - Edit history (1)
I meant no offense, but I can't control your reactions. Generally people are not insulted if the candidate they have been supporting loses or drops out and asks his/her supporters to vote for one of the remaining candidates.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)I'm insulted that you would think I'd follow him like a fucking sheep.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)I asked a simple question. I made no presumptions about how you would react. If you decide to be insulted, that is definitely on you, not me.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)And if Hillary drops out and asks me to vote for Bernie, I'd be more than happy to do that as well.
They're both good candidates.
demwing
(16,916 posts)Hillary is inevitable, and doesn't need your primary support. Give it to Bernie.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)I haven't yet decided who to vote for in the primary.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)mike_c
(36,281 posts)Would we vote for Donald Trump if Senator Sanders requested it? Of course not. He isn't fit for high public office. Neither is Senator Clinton, IMO. Senator Sander's recommendation would have to first convince me that she is not the same person who supported so many of the worst decisions American politicians made during the last 25 years. But mainly he'd have to convince me that the war of aggression against Iraq was not a crime against humanity.
I think this is just one more version of the straw man that I call the "nazis at the door" argument directed against pacifists. Would you take up arms and fight if there were nazis at your door? No? How about if they were raping your daughters? No? How about if they were torturing your grandmother? And so on, to further absurdity. First, let's wait until there are nazis at the door.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)Bernie Sanders. He is the only one I will support because I don't trust anyone else.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Otherwise no.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Howler
(4,225 posts)I wil not vote 3rd way ever again.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)I won't cast a vote for president.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)I much prefer Bernie's position on a majority of issues, but I still believe Hillary is the more "electable". Either is infinitely better than any republican.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Kinda odd that you think I'd blindly follow anything he suggested.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)I kid, of course, but thought I'd throw that out for the Puritopians.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)thats what makes him different than the status quo
my guess would be that he loathes loyalty oaths
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)....are obviously not Bernie supporters.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)without letting them micromanage your life. Voting and campaigning for someone is not the same thing as swearing an oath of fealty.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Hope you didn't hurt yourself with that one.
senz
(11,945 posts)at emotional manipulation.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Although, I did get a little emotional when I read the thread about Bernie and Sandra Bland's mother chance encounter.
Otherwise my emotions aren't that easily manipulated.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)you're wrong.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... their support for Sanders is more convenient then real.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)My decision to vote for Hillary has nothing to do with anyone else's endorsement. The only people whose endorsement carries any weight with me are people that I know and respect personally. I am happily supporting Bernie because he is highlighting the issues I think are critical at this point in time. I don't believe Hillary will act on them and if she's the nominee she will have my unenthusiastic vote because she's not an insane teabagger.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)I'll vote for the person who best represents my positive vision for the future of this country.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)And the most important thing to him is that people VOTE.
Even he himself said that he really DID NOT AGREE with Bill Clinton, and DID NOT WANT TO VOTE for him, but he did it because it was the lesser of two evils to him.
So, applying that knowledge to today, I'd agree, we'll have to vote for whomever the democratic nominee is. If it's Hillary though, I won't be very happy about it... More of the same shit to look forward to. Slow progress, same old same old...
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I imagine he would have an amazing autobiography. Really interesting life.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Very well written. It's written with his emotion, and you can hear his voice as you read it. So far, it's a bit more political than personal. It's more about his years in the political spectrum than it is about his personal life.
There are still sprinkles of personality and such throughout, so you stay glued to that, but you also get his opinions and ALL the details about everything else political throughout his career.
So far, I've only gotten to page 40 out of this 300-ish page book. So that's the best review I can give thus far!
ram2008
(1,238 posts)So long as the nomination process was fair and there were no underhanded tactics at work.
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)I remember what happened to Dean in '04, and he didn't have DWS to contend with!
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)if I am well enough to get out to vote. Would more happily vote for O'Malley as a second choice, Chaffee third. Webb seemed very off and angry the other night, I hope he drops out early.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Answer. Yes hold nose and support Hillary, even if Bernie doesn't ask.
Awful is better than awfuler.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)What will Clinton supporters do if Bernie wins?
PUMA it up again?
Ino
(3,366 posts)after the election. Until then, she has to earn it.
Response to CajunBlazer (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
DinahMoeHum
(21,783 posts). . .with or without Bernie asking me to.
Either one would be a thousand times better than any GOoPer.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Response to hrmjustin (Reply #52)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)site.
Response to hrmjustin (Reply #62)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)And no, I don't care what anyone may think about that. I can't control what others think, and others can't control what I opt to do.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)nominee.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Still, it's hard for me to give a flying fuck what you think about me. You post at a hate site--I don't seek the approval of people who do things like that.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)no i don't want you banned and I don't think bad of you, but i am getting sick of this hate site bullshit meme you push.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)PUMA = Hillary supporters
Has nothing to do with Bernie Sanders.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)for her if she is the nominee you guys are the new puma.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)You could try to whitewash what they are doing but if you guys don't vote for her if she is the nominee you guys are the new puma."
Who is "they"? Who is "you guys"?
Don't ever put the shame of Hillary pumas on Bernie Sanders supporters.
Pumas only cared about electing a woman. Bernie Sanders supporters care about the future of this nation.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Try convincing someone else because i don't buy it.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)I hope that is not the case. Bitterness eats at the soul.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Then you should tell your fellow HRC supporters to stop.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)but complain about the pumas of 2008.
Hypocrisy at its highest.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)As much fun (not) as it has been interacting with you, I'm bored and going to bed.
Goodnight.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)want to rig the nom process to shove a prowar corporatist down our throats and then complain when people don't want to vote for a rigged candidate that does not represent progressive views.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)and vote our conscience
i also believe that a party is not entitled to expect or demand my vote, especially if they rig the process for one candidate over others.
if hillary gets the nom, she will have about three months to convince me that she represents me enough to cast a vote for her. if she fails, i will vote for someone else without hesitation. and since i don't vote for hawks, she has a very high bar, one that may be impossible to reach.
this is not about "party unity." identity politcs and party loyalty are over. this election is about sending a message to the oligarchy and changing the direction of our country and i take my responsibility seriously.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i was hit or miss on du for years. but regarding the issue, if ideological differences caused them to vote for another candidate, then they should follow their conscience. voting for mccain just to screw obama out of the presidency was pretty crappy, but still their right.
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)concern.
They were 110% personality cultists, many who flipped right the fuck to McShame especially when he picked up Phailin whole some others reluctantly came home upon command from the queen once she showed she wasn't just absolutely going through the motions.
There were also quite a few nasty racists.
DianeK
(975 posts)we are not even close to the general election process..i could turn that question around to you..what would YOU do if Hillary asked you to support Bernie?
I will support whomever becomes the Democratic nominee...for now..all of my support, all of the money I can spare goes to Bernie
by the way..those two little girls in my avatar? my granddaughters with Bernie on the Spirit of Ethan Allen for his birthday several years ago
senz
(11,945 posts)and someday they'll be happy to have that photo of themselves with a great man.
And I'm with you on giving all I can to Bernie. If he loses the primary to you know who, I'll have shot my wad and start saving again.
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)If that means "holding my nose®" and voting for Hillary, then so be it. I'll do my duty.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)That's an easy question, ask me something hard.
I will not give the Republican nominee the advantage of not voting, or voting for a meaningless third party candidate, or playing Mr. "I Have a Conscious" and writing Hillary's name in. I don't vote against my selfish self interests - that would be extremely dumb!
daleanime
(17,796 posts)right?
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Seriously, if you're going to taunt, get it right.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Nobody can tell me who to vote for.
Well, that really isn't true. He can tell me, but who I actually vote for is my business alone.
Even my wife doesn't know who I vote for, despite what she might think.
Cal33
(7,018 posts)asking. She is better than any Republican. That's for sure.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)of course I'll vote for her, but she's not my first choice. Have you asked the same of Hillary's supporters?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)It is about time it is asked of Snders supporters.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)It's asked of Bernie's supporters continually. You know that.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,920 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Ill vote for hil if JC says. But not in the primary.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Anyone not voting for the dem in the general will be standing in direct opposition to the betterment of every single person in this country.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)I genuinely don't know what I'll do if she's the nominee, but honestly, I'm in California. If my vote for President actually matters in the general, we've already lost. So a protest vote wouldn't hurt.
senz
(11,945 posts)sick and tired of this oft-repeated, manipulative question?
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)Yupy
(154 posts)Is not the party but the ideas and the character of the candidate, sorry.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)make up my own mind who to vote for.
quickesst
(6,280 posts)Most will respect Bernie's opinion, and take it to heart. Those who do not will prove one thing. Their (cough cough) disapproval of Hillary outweighs any support or loyalty to Senator Sanders. Undeniable.
Yupy
(154 posts)quickesst
(6,280 posts)...is not even a coherent rebuttal of my statement. In fact, it only reinforces my opinion that there are those who value Senator Sanders for what he can contribute to the cause in bringing about the downfall of Hillary Clinton, and not as a valuable asset in the quest for a better life for all.
Yupy
(154 posts)....nice talk.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)You got that right!
quickesst
(6,280 posts)...that if Hillary is the nominee, and Bernie supports her, there will be a place for him under the already crowded bus. Hillary's supporters will of course welcome him with open hearts, and arms.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)quickesst
(6,280 posts)... but I thought this one might be a pretty easy slam dunk. I base that on past, and current consistency. I always go with the odds
DirtyHippyBastard
(217 posts)Are you a republican? Anyone who asks for a loyalty oath must be a conservative wannabe or a plant. Kiss my hippy ass and see what kind of party before policy answer that gives you.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)... for a loyalty oath has serious reading comprehension problems.
It was a simple question, but how the majority of people answer it could have an important impact in the general election. If you don't like the question you could have easily ignored it, but to complain that it should not have been asked is a cop out.
DirtyHippyBastard
(217 posts)If your hypothetical "if Bernie asks" should not be interpreted as asking for a pledge of loyalty at this stage in the game, I would apologize, but I don't understand how it is not.
This same question has been asked many times in the past few months in many cleverly worded ways on these forums, from both directions.
You are asking if I will vote for the other candidate if my guy/gal loses the primary, but it's not asking about my loyalty to the party? hmmm...
sorry, I guess.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Bernie's entire support consists of about 100 people (all at DU). So what can it matter?
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)If the nominee is Sanders, I'll be voting FOR him.
If the nominee is Clinton, then I'll be voting AGAINST the Republican nominee (by voting for Clinton.)
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)if the election is stolen for her. And that's exactly what they're setting up. We aren't as stupid as DWS likes to think we are.
I'm writing in Bernie.
wundermaus
(1,673 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)for all of the noise made by the other 134 replies on this thread.
wundermaus
(1,673 posts)I thought i read "Reptiles", not replies!
My retort was going to be "They aren't reptiles, they are only DINOs".
And that my friend is why we are doomed to swirl down the drain of history.
We continue to elect the best marketed candidate money can buy instead of who represents our best interests.
The game is rigged. The game is corrupt. The stage was a place for actors. Bernie was not playing along.
So appropriate the show (debate) was in Las Vegas; where the gamblers play and the house (corporations) always, ultimately wins. Even the commercial breaks gave it away: We were watching entertainment, not democracy. Only Bernie was live, everything else was canned.
Hilary instead of Bernie? Who turned this into a sitcom? I'm not laughing.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)there are a lot of people on this thread who apparently see the world distorted through the prisms of their biases. I suspect that they are folks who are reacting to events with emotion rather than logic. It is a natural thing to do when someone disagrees with our deeply held opinions, but we have to be smart enough and self aware enough to know how to not fall into that trap.
Have a good night.
wundermaus
(1,673 posts)Been politically engaged since 1968 so my bias runs deep.
I try to see both side of an issue but must admit, over the years my patience has run out.
The clincher for me last night was was the question ..."the most pressing issues facing our country right now, some of the biggest issues right now"...
Bernie Sanders - "The scientific community is telling us if we do not address the global crisis of climate change, transform our energy system away from fossil fuel to sustainable energy, the planet that we're going to be leaving our kids and our grandchildren may well not be habitable," Sanders said. "That is a major crisis."
His answer nailed it for me. Everything else vanishes by comparison. Our generation will die off naturally as they should. However... Future generations will be extinct by what we fail to do now.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)which is why I don't want to see a Republican in the White House for the next 4 to 8 years, especially if they control both the Senate and the House, which I believe is quite possible if a Republican wins the Presidency.
I think that you might enjoy a article I wrote for my blog entitled "Global Warming Deniers" at http://www.cajunscomments.com/global-warming-deniers/ In it I try to illustrate how down through history conservatives have fought new scientific discoveries which conflicted with their beliefs and threatened their power structure.
If you check out that article on my blog, you might also want to search the phase "global warming" and you will see the other articles I have written on the subject over time.
If read the article, please send me a DU email and tell me what you think - I could use some constructive criticism.
I have enjoyed chatting with you. It proves that though we may disagree on some subjects, we can still have a meaningful discussion.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)I can assure you that I will hold her feet to the fire by protesting every wrong move she makes with a vengeance and an 'I told you so' to those that supporter her nomination.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Bernie Sanders is the opposite of Hillary Clinton in the issues that mean most to those who support Bernie. He is not in bed with Super Pacs, Wall Street, Monsanto, and other elite-ness. I will be voting for Senator Sanders because of what he stands for (Hillary does not) and what he displays in his morals, values and the amount of caring for those poor and the lowering middle class. Hillary is all about winning all about pleasing her donators. She was so rooster like on that stage knowing the fix was in. Hillary supporters I feel you really can't see the truth (the forest for the trees) about the Oligarchy running for President.
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)And that most of my friends on the radical left were right about the whole thing.
Then I'd vote for whoever the heck I wanted to.
And then I'd get back to movement building, this time remembering to stay far, far away from the Democratic Party.
Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)That is, if I even stay in the states. Already beginning to prep for leaving the country quickly. Get out, turn in my passport, and be done with third way fascist hell.
I do not want it to come to that.
artislife
(9,497 posts)What ---is there nothing else about this election or perhaps the state of the nation or the fragility of the planet that interests you?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Serious societal scourge that it is.
MADem
(135,425 posts)cutting off their noses to spite their faces if they didn't vote for her--because a vote for her would be a vote for him.
I could see him in the Secretary of Labor slot. It's definitely his wheelhouse.
Of course, Jeb! ain't gonna put him there.