2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNot so fast! Clinton Now Re-Opens Door to Supporting Obama Trade Deal
Here she goes again! Squandering all that good will from the debates already...
Clinton continued, "I mean look, if the Congress adopted my entire work and wage agenda, I'd be pretty excited about that. But that'll have to wait until I'm actually there as president."
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/clinton-now-re-opens-door-supporting-obama-trade-deal_1046015.html
It's been a great 48 hours, but now back to reality.
Stallion
(6,474 posts)she said there were parts of the Deal should could not support and wanted to see changes. Sounds like she positioning her self to push for specific changes. Nothing wrong with that. Nothing is black and white
starroute
(12,977 posts)Up-or-down vote and all that.
So what kind of game is she playing?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)TPP is a renegotiation of NAFTA.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)NAFTA is the NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT.
It has nothing to do with China. Nothing. It also has nothing to do with legislative sovereignty, net neutrality, copyright law, fair use, or any of the dozens of other TERRIBLE items in the TPP.
NAFTA was wrong. The only way it's similar is that it's WORSE.
You're not even close.
Mars is closer.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Hillary is ignoring the most problematic
part of trade agreements, ISDS
She's all for corporate control of government
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...it's the same garbage we got from NAFTA.
Bernie Sanders has criticized ISDS (Investor State Dispute Settlement): arbitration panels available to corporations and not to the rest of us (individuals, unions, environmental groups.)
So has Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).
So have the co-chairs of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Reps. Raúl M. Grijalva (D-AZ) and Keith Ellison (D-MN):
http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/press-releases/progressive-caucus-cochairs-on-transpacific-partnership-agreement/
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)If she were consistent in her stances against things that hurt Americans work availability and wages, then she should have long ago come strongly AGAINST the H-1B instead of just a STRONG supporting stance of it that we have to look back to the 2008 election to get.
Bottom line is she's playing us, and she isn't worried about such things in reality!
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Seriously? She rocks back and forth on issues more than Ron Jeremy in a movie.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Blus4u
(608 posts)Peace
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)don't they know who she is???
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)and gave her more bags of money.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)The nerve!
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)fucking reprehensible.
antigop
(12,778 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)aquart
(69,014 posts)Hillary doesn't do that.
BERNIE doesn't do that.
Why are you doing that?
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)jkbRN
(850 posts)probably b/c she didn't want to face the ppl with a failed answer
jfern
(5,204 posts)Such a dishonest panderer.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Vinca
(50,251 posts)Did she get a new scriptwriter?
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)"I'm for it, I'm for it not. I'm for it, I'm for it not. I'm for it..."
azmom
(5,208 posts)askew
(1,464 posts)Now that Biden is likely not going to run, she can back it again and still get the union nods.
I can't even wrap my head around the idea of supporting someone who is basically a compulsive liar with no moral center who will say anything to get elected.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Bubba and Obama both got union endorsements and as soon as the Oath of Office was over there went the unions, right under the train.
Damn idjits.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)...in the first debate no one learned she would support TPP...
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)faster and faster in the hurricane of bullshit.
Everyone who is surprised by this stand on your head.......
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)Really?
starroute
(12,977 posts)Does it matter that the OP uses a right-wing source for the transcript? Hillary said what she said.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)Last edited Thu Oct 15, 2015, 08:13 PM - Edit history (1)
Surely that's not the only source for a transcript
starroute
(12,977 posts)And I don't expect you'd be any happier with The Blaze or Twitchy.
But it only happened a few hours ago. Give it time.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)NCjack
(10,279 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)DirtyHippyBastard
(217 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Derp.
Through rebuilding our infrastructure and creating green jobs through reworking the grid, but he said that, can't expect everyone to listen though.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Capital investment creates long term jobs, businesses, and start ups.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Is why it's in the state it's in, but I'm sure capital investment has the job well in hand.
Would you like to see this lovely bridge I have to sell you?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)I'm 110% for infrastructure upgrades.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)than that guy! It's going cheap, real cheap! You could call it the JaneyVee for Hillary bridge.
If you act now, I'll include a free toll booth for your bridge, and a Haz Mat team to help you in the long term!
Scuba
(53,475 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)accounted for so much of the GDP was 1929. I think the Sanders plan is more along the lines of leashing Wall Street rather than smashing it.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)Show me anywhere Bernie suggested "smashing" Wall Street. He is suggesting breaking up big banks so that they are not too big to fail in an emergency. That's traditional American capitalism, not the casino capitalism of this Age of Reagan. We cannot promote small business, engender real competition and address wealth inequality without rolling back the concentration of capital rampant for the last 34 years.
Bernie doesn't want to smash Wall Street, he wants it competitive and serving the interests of the people, neither of which is true now.
Joe Turner
(930 posts)which any unbiased observer knows need regulating and reforming trade deals that result in massive job losses that any unbiased observer knows needs reforming. Crafting trade laws that works toward domestic job creation is something most countries do except the U.S. It's called good government.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)The saddest thing that our education system has spawned is people who are willfully ignorant.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Are you saying I'm ignorant and uneducated? I have 3 college degrees.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)And you're both setting a stellar example of your educations (here and now...he's an asshole, you I don't know IRL).
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Against these issues.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Rilgin
(787 posts)I am going to give you a poison shot. But do not worry, I will use a clean needle and make sure your arm is sterile. Oh you object and think poison is bad.
"Got it, to hell with good medical procedures."
Now for a more true life example. Capital Punishment.
They give people medical care before they kill them. For some of us an argument for capital punishment is not based on the fact that before they kill them, they may take care of their medical issues. And particularly, your response to someone saying capital punishment is bad, sure looks like but first look they gave the prisoner medical care. I respond, but its capital punishment. Your response, "Got it, to hell with medical care for prisoners"
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Sounds like this talking point is straight out of RW talking point. The TPP will provide a few jobs, increasing the minimum wage will help lots of Americans, yep, throw the low wage earners to the wolves, stay on TPP, as a low wage earner I dont appreciate your concern.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)raise it.
We can increase the minimum wage with a one line bill.
Old Crow
(2,212 posts)WTF is a "high bar"? Anyone? Those words sound nice on a casual listen, but they mean nothing and do little but project a self-serving image ("I'm so demanding! I have such high standards!" . Obfuscation, distraction, bob-and-weave.
Just plainly state exactly what you like and dislike about the TPP, Hillary. Since you helped craft it, you sure as heck ought to know. Communicate clearly and honestly. You know: Like Bernie Sanders does.
I won't be holding my breath.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Am not disappoint.
Geronimoe
(1,539 posts)it was just campaign rhetoric. She has spent her entire life being a corporate tool.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Gloves suited to holding a picket sign without getting slivers in her delicate hands. Gotta keep those hands in shape for processing corporate checks!
tokenlib
(4,186 posts)Let's make the contrast clear. Hillary is so full of shit on TPP...
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)From a thread talking about Hillary's original recent statement on the TPP:
Response to restorefreedom (Original post)
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 03:44 PM
Hell Hath No Fury (15,549 posts)
63. LOTS of wiggle room in that statement.
On purpose.
What's the saying for Dem candidates, "tack left in the primary and tack right in the general"?
I suspect that as of ANOTHER day in the not-too-distant-future, she might be inclined to support it. Again.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How well do I know Hillary Clinton? THAT well. I promise you hard money that she supports trade deals JUST like the TPP. She may quibble around the edges, but she believes in the kind of trade that does well for business but is bad for American workers.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)We "NON- Admin Leadership", including Mrs. Clinton get to see and read the entire thing for 30- days, after the leadership read it for 60 days. After ALL that, President Obama may sign it.
Mrs. Clinton said the same thing most of you say, "FROM WHAT I HAVE READ ABOUT IT, I'M AGAINST IT"
But then she probably thought about it more, thought about the billions in trade revenue our American economy will lose out on if we don't trade with 1/3 of the world. Just turn that USA trade business over to the other TPP countries.
China is not a TPP signer country but they would love to keep the screws on their tiny Asian-pacific neighbor countries for another thousand years.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)First, it was the gold standard. Months after the latest leak, it suddenly wasn't good enough because of currency manipulation. First, no leak for months mean there was no new information. Second, currency manipulation has never been part of the TPP.
Now she's saying it's mostly OK. Nothing about currency manipulation. And no new information to cause this change in position.
840high
(17,196 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)pnwmom
(108,973 posts)before making a final decision.
Typical.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)they already firmly decided.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Currency manipulation has never been part of the TPP. Including back when she was Secretary of State. So it wasn't a change in the agreement, but she acted as if it was.
It kinda demonstrates she isn't just being prudent.
Bernblu
(441 posts)She knew she couldn't defend TPP. All other explanations are nonsense.
Faux pas
(14,657 posts)Just kidding, par for the course.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)If Secretary Clinton were to try to match Senator Sanders efforts to defeat the TPP then some in the administration are likely to feel very aggrieved. By their lights, they've made it even more to the standards of Progressives since Secretary Clinton deemed the TPP representing a gold standard for trade deals.
Voting could be getting pushed back, but if Sanders makes inroads in the cause to defeat it, and the Clinton campaign acquiesces to pressure to match his rhetoric, those in the administration who see the TPP as their baby, their legacy, might start thinking dark thoughts.
NYCButterfinger
(755 posts)Decide damnit
Do you support TPP or not?
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)that none of this matters because climate change will kill us all soon enough. Everything else is rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
merrily
(45,251 posts)"climate change" to the question "What is the biggest national security challenge facing the US today?"
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)she wiggled out of her nondisapproval in record time
nice to see you again, madame secretary
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)tactics that make it impossible for me to vote for her.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)She's been pretty consistent all along if you get down what she's actually said, and not what people have heard her say. Don't forget that she's married to a master word chef and she's no slouch at communications cuisine herself.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Bernblu
(441 posts)I am frankly angry about this. She is insulting our intelligence as voters. I thought she would at least wait until at least she had the nomination in hand. I guess that now that the corporate media has declared her the "winner" she can go back to her true colors. Anyone who votes for Hillary seriously believing that she is going to be a progressive president is naive or ill informed.
jfern
(5,204 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Samantha
(9,314 posts)Seems like I have heard this before....
Sam
kath
(10,565 posts)It's what HRC is ALL about.
Disgusting.