Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ram2008

(1,238 posts)
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 04:58 PM Oct 2015

Not so fast! Clinton Now Re-Opens Door to Supporting Obama Trade Deal

Here she goes again! Squandering all that good will from the debates already...

"I'm against it now," Clinton said, reiterating her new position. "But we'll see whether there is any kind of significant changes."

Clinton continued, "I mean look, if the Congress adopted my entire work and wage agenda, I'd be pretty excited about that. But that'll have to wait until I'm actually there as president."

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/clinton-now-re-opens-door-supporting-obama-trade-deal_1046015.html




It's been a great 48 hours, but now back to reality.

104 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not so fast! Clinton Now Re-Opens Door to Supporting Obama Trade Deal (Original Post) ram2008 Oct 2015 OP
That's Pretty much What She Said Last Week Stallion Oct 2015 #1
But Fast Track means there can be no changes at this point starroute Oct 2015 #35
You know that there will be more future trade deals, right? JaneyVee Oct 2015 #48
No it isn't. Not at all. elehhhhna Oct 2015 #63
What are you talking about??? Fearless Oct 2015 #71
She ignores the ISDS and talks work and wage Cosmic Kitten Oct 2015 #2
Exactly. Until Hillary Clinton says that ISDS needs to be dropped Eric J in MN Oct 2015 #23
Like she worries about "work and wage" with her stances on H-1B? cascadiance Oct 2015 #32
/\_/\_This right here_/\_/\ Scuba Oct 2015 #80
Waffler in Chief Armstead Oct 2015 #3
How can anybody support her? pinebox Oct 2015 #4
she has girl parts nt FlatBaroque Oct 2015 #9
I like her hat with a flower on it. n/t winter is coming Oct 2015 #10
But she told the Wall Street guys to cut it out! Blus4u Oct 2015 #11
...and surprisingly, they did not cut it out. nt FlatBaroque Oct 2015 #18
Yeah........ Plucketeer Oct 2015 #46
And they patted her on the head hifiguy Oct 2015 #25
They paid her 600k to talk and then didn't cut it out? elehhhhna Oct 2015 #64
For some of her supporters it's about the glass ceiling; which I can understand, but she is JRLeft Oct 2015 #14
some people actually benefit from the status quo nt antigop Oct 2015 #41
They don't give a fuck about issues jfern Oct 2015 #90
Are you having a lot of success demonizing Democrats who disagree with you? aquart Oct 2015 #102
there can be no changes -- it is an up or down vote if I remember correctly Angry Dragon Oct 2015 #5
K & R !!! WillyT Oct 2015 #6
All bullshit before the debate, jkbRN Oct 2015 #7
Of course she's not really against it jfern Oct 2015 #8
There she is. The woman we all know is there. nt artislife Oct 2015 #12
Today she's against, tomorrow she's for, the next day she's against . . . Vinca Oct 2015 #13
A bouquet of daisies maybe. Cassiopeia Oct 2015 #60
LOL Art_from_Ark Oct 2015 #92
You can't trust anything she says. N/t azmom Oct 2015 #15
She came out against it to help her win union endorsments in case Biden jumped in. askew Oct 2015 #16
How goddam stupid is the leadership of the unions endorsing her? hifiguy Oct 2015 #20
I don't think they're stupid. They are corrupt. Bought off and eager to please the money makers. nt stillwaiting Oct 2015 #29
She achieved her goal... catnhatnh Oct 2015 #17
The weathervane is spinning hifiguy Oct 2015 #19
I'll tell you when I'm president ;) Cheese Sandwich Oct 2015 #21
Welcome Back, Clinton! demwing Oct 2015 #22
Weekly Standard? Capt. Obvious Oct 2015 #24
The video is ABC News starroute Oct 2015 #38
Of course it does Capt. Obvious Oct 2015 #59
It looks like so far only right-wing sources have pounced on it starroute Oct 2015 #67
She's for it, she's against it, she's for it. This is why she is going to LOSE this election. sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #26
On critical issues like TPP, I don't like surprise packages. /nt NCjack Oct 2015 #27
She never said she's against it. Only that it didn't meet her high bar. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #28
DERP DirtyHippyBastard Oct 2015 #30
And Bernie will create jobs by smashing Wall Street and opposing US trade. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #31
No JackInGreen Oct 2015 #42
Temporary construction jobs are important, but... JaneyVee Oct 2015 #44
Our infrastructure not being considered an investment JackInGreen Oct 2015 #47
What part didn't you understand? JaneyVee Oct 2015 #50
*I* have an even better bridge to sell you Aerows Oct 2015 #53
Are you aware that the Golden Gate Bridge is constantly being repainted? Scuba Oct 2015 #81
The last time financial speculation sulphurdunn Oct 2015 #54
Right Wing hyperbole. Admiral Loinpresser Oct 2015 #95
Bernie will create jobs by regulating Wall Street Joe Turner Oct 2015 #103
Oct. 8 "As of today, I am not in favor of what I have learned about it." - Hillary Flipflop Android3.14 Oct 2015 #34
The fuck are you talking about? JaneyVee Oct 2015 #45
And Ben Carson a surgeon JackInGreen Oct 2015 #49
And your posts say a lot about who you are IRL. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #52
Zingo grahamhgreen Oct 2015 #69
Evolution doesn't have a direction. Up/down, Left/Right, Forward/Backward. Tierra_y_Libertad Oct 2015 #33
She never closed that door in the first place. Headlines were misleading because msm merrily Oct 2015 #36
Hum, so if minimum wages are increased and workers protections are put in place, guess some here are Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #37
That's just the start of it. TPP will allow her contributors to overturn US law in corporate courts. grahamhgreen Oct 2015 #72
Got it, to hell with the American workers. Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #79
Nice deflection Rilgin Oct 2015 #96
Speaking of deflection, not buying your deflection, try it on someone who buys your deflection. Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #98
That's right. The TPP will be Hell for American workers. grahamhgreen Oct 2015 #97
Are you saying not increasing the minimum wage is good for the American workers? Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #100
Minimum wage should be $22/hr. The TPP will do nothing to increase it, nor is it necessary in order grahamhgreen Oct 2015 #104
High bar, high bar, high bar. Old Crow Oct 2015 #39
Was waiting for this JackInGreen Oct 2015 #40
She was never against TTP Geronimoe Oct 2015 #43
I need to send her a free pair of gloves Plucketeer Oct 2015 #51
Hillary!! Be true to your Third Way self. You know you want to.... tokenlib Oct 2015 #55
What a weasel. n/t winter is coming Oct 2015 #56
Corporate weasel. JDPriestly Oct 2015 #57
Of couse she does! :D Hell Hath No Fury Oct 2015 #58
She hasn't seen the finished work, only the leadership Admin. can read the finished treaty. Sunlei Oct 2015 #61
Problem with your story is she changed her mind without seeing it. jeff47 Oct 2015 #74
So she lied again. Imagine that. 840high Oct 2015 #83
I'm glad I was sitting down for this shockingly unexpected news n/t arcane1 Oct 2015 #62
Everybody hates that she's a prudent person who wants to see the final paper pnwmom Oct 2015 #65
I know everyone else claims to knows whats in it.... Historic NY Oct 2015 #68
Problem with that story is she claimed she didn't support it because of currency manipulation. jeff47 Oct 2015 #75
She didn't want to go into the debate supporting TPP Bernblu Oct 2015 #87
WHAT!!!!!!!!!!! Faux pas Oct 2015 #66
I wondered if she might have to work both ends Babel_17 Oct 2015 #70
She is playing both ways NYCButterfinger Oct 2015 #73
Left, Right, Left, Right nt mhatrw Oct 2015 #76
Every once in a while, in a moment of clarity, I realize Binkie The Clown Oct 2015 #77
Seth MacFarlane said that Sanders won the debate when he was the only one to answer merrily Oct 2015 #101
well that did not take long restorefreedom Oct 2015 #78
She just did not want to answer for her support of TPP during the debate. Exactly the weasel GoneFishin Oct 2015 #82
She never closed it. ucrdem Oct 2015 #84
oh good grief... Bread and Circus Oct 2015 #85
Is she going for the flip-flop record held by Mitt Romney??? Bernblu Oct 2015 #86
Mitt Romney was a straight shooter compared to her jfern Oct 2015 #89
Rec'd. "Will flip flop for votes" n/t Catherina Oct 2015 #88
"Significant" = weasel word. CharlotteVale Oct 2015 #91
I was for it before I was against it Samantha Oct 2015 #93
Flip. Flop. Flip. kath Oct 2015 #94
This is the vacillating, ambivalent lingo of a corporate sellout. Not cool. At all. nt ancianita Oct 2015 #99

Stallion

(6,474 posts)
1. That's Pretty much What She Said Last Week
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:05 PM
Oct 2015

she said there were parts of the Deal should could not support and wanted to see changes. Sounds like she positioning her self to push for specific changes. Nothing wrong with that. Nothing is black and white

starroute

(12,977 posts)
35. But Fast Track means there can be no changes at this point
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:44 PM
Oct 2015

Up-or-down vote and all that.

So what kind of game is she playing?

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
71. What are you talking about???
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:49 PM
Oct 2015

NAFTA is the NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT.

It has nothing to do with China. Nothing. It also has nothing to do with legislative sovereignty, net neutrality, copyright law, fair use, or any of the dozens of other TERRIBLE items in the TPP.

NAFTA was wrong. The only way it's similar is that it's WORSE.

You're not even close.

Mars is closer.

Cosmic Kitten

(3,498 posts)
2. She ignores the ISDS and talks work and wage
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:06 PM
Oct 2015

Hillary is ignoring the most problematic
part of trade agreements, ISDS

She's all for corporate control of government

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
23. Exactly. Until Hillary Clinton says that ISDS needs to be dropped
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:21 PM
Oct 2015

...it's the same garbage we got from NAFTA.

Bernie Sanders has criticized ISDS (Investor State Dispute Settlement): arbitration panels available to corporations and not to the rest of us (individuals, unions, environmental groups.)

So has Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).

So have the co-chairs of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Reps. Raúl M. Grijalva (D-AZ) and Keith Ellison (D-MN):
http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/press-releases/progressive-caucus-cochairs-on-transpacific-partnership-agreement/

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
32. Like she worries about "work and wage" with her stances on H-1B?
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:40 PM
Oct 2015

If she were consistent in her stances against things that hurt Americans work availability and wages, then she should have long ago come strongly AGAINST the H-1B instead of just a STRONG supporting stance of it that we have to look back to the 2008 election to get.

Bottom line is she's playing us, and she isn't worried about such things in reality!

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
4. How can anybody support her?
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:06 PM
Oct 2015

Seriously? She rocks back and forth on issues more than Ron Jeremy in a movie.

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
14. For some of her supporters it's about the glass ceiling; which I can understand, but she is
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:35 PM
Oct 2015

fucking reprehensible.

aquart

(69,014 posts)
102. Are you having a lot of success demonizing Democrats who disagree with you?
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 09:56 AM
Oct 2015

Hillary doesn't do that.
BERNIE doesn't do that.

Why are you doing that?

Vinca

(50,251 posts)
13. Today she's against, tomorrow she's for, the next day she's against . . .
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:34 PM
Oct 2015

Did she get a new scriptwriter?

askew

(1,464 posts)
16. She came out against it to help her win union endorsments in case Biden jumped in.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 05:44 PM
Oct 2015

Now that Biden is likely not going to run, she can back it again and still get the union nods.

I can't even wrap my head around the idea of supporting someone who is basically a compulsive liar with no moral center who will say anything to get elected.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
20. How goddam stupid is the leadership of the unions endorsing her?
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:13 PM
Oct 2015

Bubba and Obama both got union endorsements and as soon as the Oath of Office was over there went the unions, right under the train.

Damn idjits.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
19. The weathervane is spinning
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:11 PM
Oct 2015

faster and faster in the hurricane of bullshit.

Everyone who is surprised by this stand on your head.......

starroute

(12,977 posts)
38. The video is ABC News
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:48 PM
Oct 2015

Does it matter that the OP uses a right-wing source for the transcript? Hillary said what she said.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
67. It looks like so far only right-wing sources have pounced on it
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:42 PM
Oct 2015

And I don't expect you'd be any happier with The Blaze or Twitchy.

But it only happened a few hours ago. Give it time.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
42. No
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:57 PM
Oct 2015

Through rebuilding our infrastructure and creating green jobs through reworking the grid, but he said that, can't expect everyone to listen though.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
44. Temporary construction jobs are important, but...
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:01 PM
Oct 2015

Capital investment creates long term jobs, businesses, and start ups.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
47. Our infrastructure not being considered an investment
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:04 PM
Oct 2015

Is why it's in the state it's in, but I'm sure capital investment has the job well in hand.

Would you like to see this lovely bridge I have to sell you?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
53. *I* have an even better bridge to sell you
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:12 PM
Oct 2015

than that guy! It's going cheap, real cheap! You could call it the JaneyVee for Hillary bridge.

If you act now, I'll include a free toll booth for your bridge, and a Haz Mat team to help you in the long term!

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
54. The last time financial speculation
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:14 PM
Oct 2015

accounted for so much of the GDP was 1929. I think the Sanders plan is more along the lines of leashing Wall Street rather than smashing it.

Admiral Loinpresser

(3,859 posts)
95. Right Wing hyperbole.
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 01:23 PM
Oct 2015

Show me anywhere Bernie suggested "smashing" Wall Street. He is suggesting breaking up big banks so that they are not too big to fail in an emergency. That's traditional American capitalism, not the casino capitalism of this Age of Reagan. We cannot promote small business, engender real competition and address wealth inequality without rolling back the concentration of capital rampant for the last 34 years.

Bernie doesn't want to smash Wall Street, he wants it competitive and serving the interests of the people, neither of which is true now.

 

Joe Turner

(930 posts)
103. Bernie will create jobs by regulating Wall Street
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:15 AM
Oct 2015

which any unbiased observer knows need regulating and reforming trade deals that result in massive job losses that any unbiased observer knows needs reforming. Crafting trade laws that works toward domestic job creation is something most countries do except the U.S. It's called good government.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
34. Oct. 8 "As of today, I am not in favor of what I have learned about it." - Hillary Flipflop
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:43 PM
Oct 2015

The saddest thing that our education system has spawned is people who are willfully ignorant.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
45. The fuck are you talking about?
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:02 PM
Oct 2015

Are you saying I'm ignorant and uneducated? I have 3 college degrees.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
49. And Ben Carson a surgeon
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:06 PM
Oct 2015

And you're both setting a stellar example of your educations (here and now...he's an asshole, you I don't know IRL).

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
37. Hum, so if minimum wages are increased and workers protections are put in place, guess some here are
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:48 PM
Oct 2015

Against these issues.

Rilgin

(787 posts)
96. Nice deflection
Fri Oct 16, 2015, 03:08 PM
Oct 2015

I am going to give you a poison shot. But do not worry, I will use a clean needle and make sure your arm is sterile. Oh you object and think poison is bad.

"Got it, to hell with good medical procedures."

Now for a more true life example. Capital Punishment.

They give people medical care before they kill them. For some of us an argument for capital punishment is not based on the fact that before they kill them, they may take care of their medical issues. And particularly, your response to someone saying capital punishment is bad, sure looks like but first look they gave the prisoner medical care. I respond, but its capital punishment. Your response, "Got it, to hell with medical care for prisoners"

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
100. Are you saying not increasing the minimum wage is good for the American workers?
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 09:47 AM
Oct 2015

Sounds like this talking point is straight out of RW talking point. The TPP will provide a few jobs, increasing the minimum wage will help lots of Americans, yep, throw the low wage earners to the wolves, stay on TPP, as a low wage earner I dont appreciate your concern.

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
104. Minimum wage should be $22/hr. The TPP will do nothing to increase it, nor is it necessary in order
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 04:19 PM
Oct 2015

raise it.

We can increase the minimum wage with a one line bill.

Old Crow

(2,212 posts)
39. High bar, high bar, high bar.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:49 PM
Oct 2015

WTF is a "high bar"? Anyone? Those words sound nice on a casual listen, but they mean nothing and do little but project a self-serving image ("I'm so demanding! I have such high standards!&quot . Obfuscation, distraction, bob-and-weave.

Just plainly state exactly what you like and dislike about the TPP, Hillary. Since you helped craft it, you sure as heck ought to know. Communicate clearly and honestly. You know: Like Bernie Sanders does.

I won't be holding my breath.

 

Geronimoe

(1,539 posts)
43. She was never against TTP
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 06:57 PM
Oct 2015

it was just campaign rhetoric. She has spent her entire life being a corporate tool.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
51. I need to send her a free pair of gloves
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:10 PM
Oct 2015

Gloves suited to holding a picket sign without getting slivers in her delicate hands. Gotta keep those hands in shape for processing corporate checks!

tokenlib

(4,186 posts)
55. Hillary!! Be true to your Third Way self. You know you want to....
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:17 PM
Oct 2015

Let's make the contrast clear. Hillary is so full of shit on TPP...

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
58. Of couse she does! :D
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:21 PM
Oct 2015

From a thread talking about Hillary's original recent statement on the TPP:

Response to restorefreedom (Original post)

Thu Oct 8, 2015, 03:44 PM
Hell Hath No Fury (15,549 posts)

63. LOTS of wiggle room in that statement.

On purpose.

What's the saying for Dem candidates, "tack left in the primary and tack right in the general"?

I suspect that as of ANOTHER day in the not-too-distant-future, she might be inclined to support it. Again.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

How well do I know Hillary Clinton? THAT well. I promise you hard money that she supports trade deals JUST like the TPP. She may quibble around the edges, but she believes in the kind of trade that does well for business but is bad for American workers.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
61. She hasn't seen the finished work, only the leadership Admin. can read the finished treaty.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:27 PM
Oct 2015

We "NON- Admin Leadership", including Mrs. Clinton get to see and read the entire thing for 30- days, after the leadership read it for 60 days. After ALL that, President Obama may sign it.

Mrs. Clinton said the same thing most of you say, "FROM WHAT I HAVE READ ABOUT IT, I'M AGAINST IT"

But then she probably thought about it more, thought about the billions in trade revenue our American economy will lose out on if we don't trade with 1/3 of the world. Just turn that USA trade business over to the other TPP countries.

China is not a TPP signer country but they would love to keep the screws on their tiny Asian-pacific neighbor countries for another thousand years.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
74. Problem with your story is she changed her mind without seeing it.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 08:09 PM
Oct 2015

First, it was the gold standard. Months after the latest leak, it suddenly wasn't good enough because of currency manipulation. First, no leak for months mean there was no new information. Second, currency manipulation has never been part of the TPP.

Now she's saying it's mostly OK. Nothing about currency manipulation. And no new information to cause this change in position.

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
65. Everybody hates that she's a prudent person who wants to see the final paper
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:38 PM
Oct 2015

before making a final decision.

Typical.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
75. Problem with that story is she claimed she didn't support it because of currency manipulation.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 08:12 PM
Oct 2015

Currency manipulation has never been part of the TPP. Including back when she was Secretary of State. So it wasn't a change in the agreement, but she acted as if it was.

It kinda demonstrates she isn't just being prudent.

Bernblu

(441 posts)
87. She didn't want to go into the debate supporting TPP
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 11:09 PM
Oct 2015

She knew she couldn't defend TPP. All other explanations are nonsense.

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
70. I wondered if she might have to work both ends
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 07:49 PM
Oct 2015

If Secretary Clinton were to try to match Senator Sanders efforts to defeat the TPP then some in the administration are likely to feel very aggrieved. By their lights, they've made it even more to the standards of Progressives since Secretary Clinton deemed the TPP representing a gold standard for trade deals.

Voting could be getting pushed back, but if Sanders makes inroads in the cause to defeat it, and the Clinton campaign acquiesces to pressure to match his rhetoric, those in the administration who see the TPP as their baby, their legacy, might start thinking dark thoughts.

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
77. Every once in a while, in a moment of clarity, I realize
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 08:15 PM
Oct 2015

that none of this matters because climate change will kill us all soon enough. Everything else is rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
101. Seth MacFarlane said that Sanders won the debate when he was the only one to answer
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 09:54 AM
Oct 2015

"climate change" to the question "What is the biggest national security challenge facing the US today?"

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
78. well that did not take long
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 08:24 PM
Oct 2015

she wiggled out of her nondisapproval in record time

nice to see you again, madame secretary

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
82. She just did not want to answer for her support of TPP during the debate. Exactly the weasel
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 08:50 PM
Oct 2015

tactics that make it impossible for me to vote for her.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
84. She never closed it.
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 08:56 PM
Oct 2015

She's been pretty consistent all along if you get down what she's actually said, and not what people have heard her say. Don't forget that she's married to a master word chef and she's no slouch at communications cuisine herself.

Bernblu

(441 posts)
86. Is she going for the flip-flop record held by Mitt Romney???
Thu Oct 15, 2015, 10:55 PM
Oct 2015

I am frankly angry about this. She is insulting our intelligence as voters. I thought she would at least wait until at least she had the nomination in hand. I guess that now that the corporate media has declared her the "winner" she can go back to her true colors. Anyone who votes for Hillary seriously believing that she is going to be a progressive president is naive or ill informed.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Not so fast! Clinton Now ...