DNC committeewoman claims party is 'clearing a path' for Hillary

[peacebird]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3273404/Democratic-National-Committeewoman-says-party-clearing-path-Hillary-women-charge-want-way.html

Female member of the Democratic Party's controlling body spoke to Daily Mail Online in Las Vegas following Tuesday's primary debate
She rattled off a list of women at the top of the party hierarchy and said two vice chairs helped craft a decision this summer to favor Clinton
The committeewoman warned her party could promote Hillary 'because she's a woman, and risk having her implode after she's nominated'
The Democratic National Committee insisted that it 'runs an impartial primary process, period'
But it has sanctioned just six debates this time around; Democratic presidential candidates had to survive 27 of them in 2007-08
DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz campaigned for Hillary in 2008 when she last ran for the presidency

[Bread and Circus]

1. If this is true is this not institutuional sexism?

This is an honest question because as a male I generally am not a victim of institional sexism and I do think women women traditionally have been. I honestly have not studied the topic.

But if the leaders of an institution purposefully and systematically collude together to create structural framework to promote a woman at the expense of her male competitors, is that not sexism?

Please educate me.

[peacebird]

2. Not sure if its sexist as much as it is cronyism at its worst. But it's wrong, the party leaders

Should be impartial

[Art_from_Ark]

4. I think I'm going to

[sufrommich]

3. Right wing rag claims the wimmins have taken over the party

and claims anonymous woman agrees with them.

[Fumesucker]

5. And Karl Rove says Sanders is an "elderly dyspeptic Bilbo Baggins"

Feel the love!

[restorefreedom]

6. kick nt

[WillyT]

7. K & R !!!