2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTrevor Noah smacks down Bernie Sanders’ fans: “Online doesn’t count”
Daily Show host Trevor Noah had a chuckle over the media and the internets disagreement over who won the Democratic debate.
He pointed out that, according to CNNs first poll since the debate, Hillary Clinton was declared to be the clear winner, and ruled the stage by 62 percent. Simultaneously, numerous other CNN talk show hosts claimed that Bernie Sanders had won hands down online.
Apparently Sanders was the most Tweeted, Facebooked, and Google-searched Democratic candidate of the night, proving particularly popular with millennials.
But as Noah saliently pointed out: The Internet is saying that Bernie Sanders won the debate and the media is saying, sorry, the Internet doesnt apply here. Its sort of the same reason your geeky cousin is still a virgin: online doesnt count.
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/20/trevor_noah_smacks_down_bernie_sanders_fans_online_doesnt_count/
Uncle Joe
(58,298 posts)Thanks for the thread, RandySF.
RandySF
(58,511 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,298 posts)on Facebook "kids" four times within 21 seconds.
The corporate media isn't just stereotyping or attacking an inanimate object whey they attack the Internet, they're attacking the American People, we started the Internet.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)By "corporate," which corporation are you trusting? I believe one of the corporate entities you mention is absolutely dwarfed by the other.
Uncle Joe
(58,298 posts)other hand might number in the hundreds and they get paid by their corporate masters, the American People on Facebook don't...I haven't received a check yet anyway and I don't anyone else that has.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It seems you don't understand how much control of flow and moment they have. Their influence is huge. It's actually very impressive.
Uncle Joe
(58,298 posts)peoples' thinking than polls held two-three days after the debate and corporate media heavily edited, saturation coverage promoting their narrow interpretation.
The corporate media and its pundits have an inherent conflict of interest.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)I know. That's probably not scientific enough.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Punching down when it's 'ok' to. Trevors running hot for me, I've been digging it, but there are times (the joke cribbed from chapelle, this, some of his more misogynist humor) where I wince.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Unfunny misogynist says what?
brooklynite
(94,363 posts)MrWendel
(1,881 posts)SLAP!!!
LOL
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)It reminds me of the old saw that ten inches on the internet is five inches in real life.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 21, 2015, 01:10 AM - Edit history (1)
Especially when the corporate owner is a major donor of the so-called winner.
http://poorrichardsnews.com/naturally-cnns-parent-company-is-one-of-hillary-clintons-biggest-donors/
Naturally, CNNs parent company is one of Hillary Clintons biggest donors
In Election, Media Bias by Poor Richard October 15, 2015 Comment
If you watched the first Democrat Presidential debate last night on CNN, it was plainly obvious that the head honchos did their level best to make it the Hillary Clinton show. The main moderator, Anderson Cooper, used to be a member of the Clinton Global Initiative; and he couldnt wait to interrupt each of the other candidates so that he could get back to whatever Hillary Clinton wanted to say. Clinton was front and center on the stage, and it wasnt by accident.
The speaking times for each of the candidates was predictably lopsided, with Clinton getting double the speaking time of some of the other candidates
There's a big difference between a winner and a usurper.
Sam
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)The bit last night was well done
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Is obviously manipulated by corporatist third wayer neo liberal DINOs