Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 03:40 PM Oct 2015

Fortune: President Bernie Sanders: Bad for bankers, perhaps not so bad for banks

President Bernie Sanders: Bad for bankers, perhaps not so bad for banks

By Ben Geier - OCTOBER 21, 2015, 2:22 PM EDT

Sanders’ plan to cap the size of any given bank would be bad for those at the top. But it might not be terrible news for the industry as a whole.

One year ago, the idea of a Bernie Sanders presidency was laughable. Hillary Clinton may not be the perfect candidate, the thinking it went, but there was no way Democrats would vote for a septuagenarian, democratic-socialist, Independent Senator from Vermont; one who honeymooned in the Soviet Union and offered support for the socialist Sandinistas in Nicaragua in the 1980s. There was no way that guy had any chance to be president, right?

Wrong.

As of the most recent polls, the Real Clear Politics average has Sanders polling at 25% nationally. Yes, that’s nearly 20 points behind Clinton, but for a candidate with views that are on the fringe of American politics, it is remarkable. Yes, it is still a long shot, but the American political world now has to reckon with the fact that a Sanders administration is possible.

If there’s one group that is likely shaking at the thought of a President Sanders, it’s the financial sector.

“The biggest impact would be Jamie Dimon’s and Lloyd Blankfein’s bonus,” said Dennis Kelleher, founder of non-partisan advocacy group Better Markets. “And that is not a net loss to the country.”..

Full article:
http://fortune.com/2015/10/21/bernie-sanders-bankers-banks/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fortune: President Bernie Sanders: Bad for bankers, perhaps not so bad for banks (Original Post) think Oct 2015 OP
The only point on which I'd disagree with the article is... PatrickforO Oct 2015 #1
Exactly, they're on the fringe of the Official Narrative only n/t arcane1 Oct 2015 #2
Yep mhatrw Oct 2015 #5
There is another positive that no one ever mentions. Back in jwirr Oct 2015 #3
On the fringe, gawd I caught hate the corporate media. JRLeft Oct 2015 #4

PatrickforO

(14,569 posts)
1. The only point on which I'd disagree with the article is...
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 03:46 PM
Oct 2015

the line, "but for a candidate with views that are on the fringe of American politics..."

Over 50% of Americans agree with every single position Bernie is campaigning on.

But, of course, Fortune has to take the 'fringe' stance because it is a huge, corporate-owned propaganda organ that makes its money spewing out what is basically the corporate line.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
3. There is another positive that no one ever mentions. Back in
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 04:21 PM
Oct 2015

the good old days almost every town had their own bank. And that bank was a real part of the economy of those towns. The banker knew the people they were giving loans to and the community prospered. And the people knew the banker. They went to church with him and his family.

Now that of course was when 2% of the population was urban and the rest were rural. So it would not necessarily work the same way but they could still be community related banks. Bankers that were concerned about the community they were in.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Fortune: President Bernie...