2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDon't let the Bernie movement hijack the word "progressive."
On substance, Hillary and Bernie stand for very much the same things. Raising the minimum wage, protecting unions, investing in clean energy, expanding the safety net, gender/racial/LGBT equality, and so on. This is what progressivism is about: making the country better, fairer, cleaner, and more equitable. All the leading Dem candidates, and their core supporters are progressive.
The difference is, in order to be part of the hardcore Bernie movement, you have to subscribe a bunch of loony beliefs. For example:
1) That pollsters are deliberately skewing their polls in favor of Hillary.
2) That elected leaders of major unions are intentionally betraying their causes because they have been bought off by Hillary henchmen.
3) That most pundits have been given orders by their corporate bosses to write pro-Hillary articles (and that despite ignoring those orders most of the time, they haven't been fired).
4) That self-selecting internet polls represent the "will of the people".
5) That donations from people who work at corporations are the same as corporate donations.
If progressiveness becomes associated with conspiracy theories, it will hinder the growth of the progressive movement, because sane people don't want to be associated with nutty beliefs, and it will also turn off independents and moderates.
Ask an average American whether they support a higher minimum wage, they'll say yes. But if you start calling everyone under the sun a "corporatist" or a "bankster" because their cousin's roommate once opened a bank account with HSBC, they're going to think you're a nut. And for good reason.
Progressivism is about positive social change, and it's also about reason and science. Don't let the conspiracy theories coming out of the Bernie movement change that.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)And in case you're not aware, votes on issues like, for example, a war resolution are not the same as votes on an issue, like, for example, naming a post office.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)It's almost as if she'll change her message depending on who's listening...
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)But, she says that it depends on the definition of "progressive", as well.
If voting for wars makes one progressive, then she must be in the wrong party.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)These are her own words, changing radically in short succession depending on the audience.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Simple as that, really.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Thanks in advance.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/10/politics/hillary-clinton-democrat-progressive/index.html
She can't be both. Was she lying when she said she was moderate or was she lying when she said she was progressive? Considering her record - and her backers - I'm convinced she was lying when she said she was progressive.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I will ask again for a link where she denies being a progressive. You made the claim, as it stands it is completely false on your part. Stating she denies being a progressive is obviously a lie. I at least appreciate you show you can't back it up. Link to where she denies being a progressive?
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)"I get accused of being kind of MODERATE .. I plead guilty"
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The poster stated that Clinton denies being a progressive. That is an absolute lie at this point. Now there are two of you to do the research. Please find a quote backing up said posters claim. Specially if you want to drop personal attacks that have no place. Now two of you have not been able to back up the claim. I do wear glasses. I haven't had the old four eye thing trotted out since grade school.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)the ball's in your court.
tblue
(16,350 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)she didn't really mean she isn't also a progressive, or something like that.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Who said progressives can't be moderates?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)I'm kind of moderate too. But my idea of moderate is the values of liberal democrat,, like FDR, LBJ (minus the war)....These days those guys would be considered off the charts leftist.
Moderate and center is code for "I'm not goinbg to change too much." Progressve next to that means nothing.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)[img][/img]
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Not as bad as a total republican, but she's still a Republican. Just republican lite.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Link?
Scuba
(53,475 posts)http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/10/politics/hillary-clinton-democrat-progressive/index.html
She can't be both. Was she lying when she said she was moderate or was she lying when she said she was progressive? Considering her record - and her backers - I'm convinced she was lying when she said she was progressive.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)What Hillary is: opportunistic.
Segami
(14,923 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)OMFG! I am soooo done with her.
Nice try, Dan. Not really.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)someone that you don't like.
Thanks for reminding me.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)I'm crushed.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Simplifying complicated things to the point of nonsensical.
Response to Armstead (Reply #4)
Ed Suspicious This message was self-deleted by its author.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)interfere with our misapplication of the term 'progressive'.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)Progressive to some other people means a bunch of nutty conspiracy theories. My point is, don't let the conspiracy theory progressives hijack the word from the social change progressives.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Welp, I guess all Bernie supporters are nut jobs. Case closed. My goodness...
Chan790
(20,176 posts)I'd be disappointed if Dan didn't claim Hillary was a progressive...it would actually make me question my sanity if he just admitted Hillary was a center-right candidate as is apparent to anybody paying attention.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Hillary spoke about every one of her positions in IA Saturday so it shouldn't be hard for you to listen to her speech and pull out the center right positions.
What you don't want to listen to a word she says.
I thought so since all you do is make up shit.
ProgressiveVC
(79 posts)-Financial reform
-Tax reform
-Budget proposals
-Foreign policy (like, all of it)
-Banking regulation
thats off the top of my head..
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Most of the anti Hillary posts on this board are empty meaningless rhetoric.
ProgressiveVC
(79 posts)Hillary Clinton, who never saw a war she didn't vote for, has a center right foreign policy.
Hillary Clinton, as junior senator of NY, kindly asked Wall Street to 'knock it off.'
Hillary Clinton, promises the third way of compromising Social Security and Medicare.
So, yes, those are titles. Titles of the positions of why I will not be voting for HRC in the primary.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)thanks.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)not the way Sanders and O'Malley do.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)Hillary calling herself a progressive is like David Duke joining the Congress of Racial Equality...it defies rational belief but there's nothing stopping her from doing the incredible...by which I mean "that which is not credible."
We don't need to hijack the term...a progressive can't do the things she's done or take money from the people she's taken money from or believe the things she believes and remain a progressive. This is naught but another lame attempt to move the moderate window to further disenfranchise the left-of-center.
To say "Yes" to progressive values is to say "No, now and forever!" to Hillary.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)DUzy and bon mot!
Scuba
(53,475 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Kucinich and others have been holding this sector for decades. He isn't even polling that much higher than some of the past people carrying this mantle. Second, Sanders is a progressive. He can call himself whatever he wants but actions are what matters. He has shown himself to be one of the most progressive people out there. His rhetoric is red meat for his base. He knows who they are and it is the reason he repeats the same thing over and over again. He knows these are the people filling his coffers and who are willing to work for him. He panders to that segment as all politicians do. They buy it hook, line and sinker.
I do agree that progressivism shouldn't be linked to many of the things you pointed out in your op. Fact is, many of those things have nothing to do with progressivism. They do have to do with outliers in society. I like your second to last sentence. Your points are also spot on, just not sure it can be neatly wrapped up in the discussion of a phrase as you are trying to do.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Loony beliefs while you support a candidate who changes her mind all the damn time on everything?
This is NOT progressive.
Threatening to lob bombs at Iran.
Being against a $15/hr minimum wage.
Being against single payer.
Being against same sex marriage.
Being pro-trade deals which screw the American worker.
Describing yourself as a moderate then the next week, you wake up and say "Hey! It's Monday! I'm a progressive now!"
No. Sorry, she's a blue dog DINO at heart.
Ike was more progressive than Hillary in many ways.
The truth is the polls and all that jazz, you all seem to keep forgetting something.
At this stage of the election, Obama was doing WORSE than what Hillary currently is. You can ra ra all you want but if you forget history, you're bound to repeat it.
I'll let my president do the bidding here, go watch it!
"Obama, I can't tell whom I'm running against sometimes".
No shit.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Run with it have fun with it mold it into whatever you will. I am a liberal before all else. Bernie is appealing to the liberals of the party not necessarily just the progressives.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)great care was taken to draw a distinction between being a liberal and being a progressive? A goodly number, to be sure. I used to take time to argue that I was both liberal and progressive and I stopped after a while because it was clear that this was something undertaken by design. Who wants to split the left? You tell me.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)It's not a manufactured from the outside split either it's only natural. There are people who are more like anarchists like myself and those who are more authoritarian. Anarchists are liberals, authoritarians are progressives.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)We have been given to believe that anarchists are the true progressives. I am liberal and progressive. Sometimes people can walk and chew gum at the same time.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)...lol
elleng
(130,732 posts)we MO'Mers GET THINGS DONE!
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)For example, your game of characterization of your political rivals is not at all progressive, it is a hallmark tactic of the right wing but not the upscale right, it's pure AM radio material.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)This is really poor propagandizing. Hillary Clinton is not a progressive, period. Any hijacking therefore is on her part.
If you think her center-right record and policies are better, argue that. Argue why Wall Street just needs a good scolding. Argue why we don't need Glass-Steagall. Why Iraq was the right call. Why marriage equality was a bad thing before it was a good thing.
Telling the actual left that it's crazy just proves the opposite.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)How can one "hijack" a term that fits them to a "tee"?
I can't believe you think Hillary is more progressive than Bernie.
Bernie is so progressive, he's a racist!
Haven't you been reading DU lately?
Sheesh!
dmosh42
(2,217 posts)so let's stop with your bullshit! Bernie & Hillary are miles apart in real life, but if you think they're the same, Hillary wouldn't mind getting rid of her super pacs.
Autumn
(44,980 posts)The rest of your OP is what is found in a stall... in a barn...on the floor.
djean111
(14,255 posts)Oh, and I do not see Hillary as a model for positive social change. IMO she just talks about it a lot. And changes it according to polls and focus groups. Not worth listening to, for me.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)bastardized by "progressives." You are correct. Allowing it to be used as a bludgeon is divisive and counterproductive to change. We all want our nation to move forward.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)...which is to the right of progressive. What does 'moderate' even mean? Is there a 'moderate' political ideology in existence? If so, what is it?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Amnesty?
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)But since she is Flip-Flopping around already, telling different groups different things...
Camp Weathervane...round and round she goes!
And Trust...I don't trust her on anything.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)To suggest that she and Bernie have similar platforms is so ludicrous, it's beyond the pale.
I wonder if you are even paying attention or if you know anything about Hillary or Bernie.
Bernie gets his money from "We The People" because he will serve "We The People."
Hillary's biggest campaign donors are Goldman Sachs, Citibank, Time Warner and other big banks. Those are Hillary's key publics.
She's also saber rattled for war with Iran and refused to walk back her Iraq War vote--despite the common knowledge that it was a horrendous lie-based war based on manufactured intelligence. She's taken money from big Pharma and from the private-prison lobby that wants to continue running a for-profit prison model that thrives only when US citizens are locked up. SICK.
Daran Kagan, a neocon kingmaker has said that he is, "Fine with Hillary's foreign-policy stances."
Hillary is part of the problem. Bernie is part of the solution.
I've never seen a greater chasm with any two Democratic frontrunners. Clinton and Obama were more similar than Clinton and Sanders. To suggest that these two "want the same things" is a laughable stretch.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Loony CTs are just that - Loony CTs
Gamecock Lefty
(700 posts)Just like he's a Democrat!
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)The only thing a Bernie supporter has to remember how far behind Obama was at this point in 2008.
That is all.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)"Progressive" is more than a marketing label.
Hillary is no Progressive. Not by a long shot. Progressives do not:
1. Vote for illegal foreign wars.
2. Prostrate themselves before Wall Street for campaign cash.
3. Cozy up to the private prison industry.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)tell you she's not a Republican in sheep's clothing......
Response to DanTex (Original post)
Corruption Inc This message was self-deleted by its author.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)hillary is not a progressive, she's not a liberal. At best she is center right
jalan48
(13,841 posts)ProgressiveVC
(79 posts)is it
1. Back-patting from Clinton supporters who are too stupid to read between the lines?
2. Inspire Sanders voters to stay home on general election day?
3. Spit vitriol about non-issues?
4. Increase the amount of ridiculousness falling out of HRC supporters mouths, like turds in a toilet?
Please pick 1-4.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)As part of their attacks on Obama.
Sanders "supporters" are just carrying on the tradition.