Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flpoljunkie

(26,184 posts)
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 09:36 AM Aug 2012

Krugman: Unethical Commentary, Newsweek Edition (Niall Ferguson's Cover Story)

August 19, 2012
Unethical Commentary, Newsweek Edition

There are multiple errors and misrepresentations in Niall Ferguson’s cover story in Newsweek — I guess they don’t do fact-checking — but this is the one that jumped out at me. Ferguson says:

The president pledged that health-care reform would not add a cent to the deficit. But the CBO and the Joint Committee on Taxation now estimate that the insurance-coverage provisions of the ACA will have a net cost of close to $1.2 trillion over the 2012–22 period.

Readers are no doubt meant to interpret this as saying that CBO found that the Act will increase the deficit. But anyone who actually read, or even skimmed, the CBO report (pdf) knows that it found that the ACA would reduce, not increase, the deficit — because the insurance subsidies were fully paid for.

Now, people on the right like to argue that the CBO was wrong. But that’s not the argument Ferguson is making — he is deliberately misleading readers, conveying the impression that the CBO had actually rejected Obama’s claim that health reform is deficit-neutral, when in fact the opposite is true.

more...

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/19/unethical-commentary-newsweek-edition/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: Unethical Commentary, Newsweek Edition (Niall Ferguson's Cover Story) (Original Post) flpoljunkie Aug 2012 OP
ban newsweek. fairnesss doctorrine Dkc05 Aug 2012 #1
don't ban it, just don't subscribe. let them go broke /nt still_one Aug 2012 #2
um, mopinko Aug 2012 #4
Holder is too busy chasing MJ users and growers Hydra Aug 2012 #5
Comments on Krugman's blog have some interesting responses... Blue_Roses Aug 2012 #3

mopinko

(70,020 posts)
4. um,
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 11:18 AM
Aug 2012

you know there is no fairness doctrine, right. dumped by st ronnie of raygun long ago. and only applied to teevee, anyway.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
5. Holder is too busy chasing MJ users and growers
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 12:51 PM
Aug 2012

To be bothered with Geneva level crimes and world wide bank fraud, let alone RW propaganda being sold as "facts."

Blue_Roses

(12,894 posts)
3. Comments on Krugman's blog have some interesting responses...
Mon Aug 20, 2012, 10:40 AM
Aug 2012

like this one:

" Perry -Texas

Aug. 20, 2012 at 1:40 a.m. RECOMMENDED 3

In my 60 plus years of watching political wrestling this is the worst I've seen major media lean toward one political party/canidate. All major news networks are obviously favoring Romney & Ryan in the way they present the "news". There is nothing fair or balanced about it. Many times they only showcase the Romney campaign andgive no rebuttal message from President Obama."

Notice the name and state. Weird.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/19/unethical-commentary-newsweek-edition/

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Krugman: Unethical Comme...