2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow Much Are Pollsters Really Getting Paid?
Test the waters then come up with a position.......
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/how-much-are-pollsters-paid_55d70f55e4b00d8137edded5?cps=gravity_5059_-8224929146900113401&kvcommref=mostpopular
mmonk
(52,589 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It would truly be foolish and extremely arrogant if they didn't. Can you think of one current contender in the democratic primary not using polling?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251464571
I'm assuming that's changed, now.
Sid
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I would find it to be truly foolish and arrogant if he wasn't using them.
He has pulled a lot of new people into the process. I'm trying to drown out their noise while still respecting their entrance into politics. It is hard to read some of the things they say.
One of the first comments I read at your link said "Sanders doesn't need polling." I can't stop laughing. Sanders himself seems to be in disagreement on that one.
MineralMan
(146,287 posts)not candidates. Candidate-funded polls are not what I'm looking at, that's for sure.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Looking at very small slices of demographics, geography, etc.
MineralMan
(146,287 posts)It's pretty useless in monitoring how campaigns are doing for general purposes.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I would love to see the polls Clinton and Sanders have commissioned.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)nt
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)He originally thought it was a principled stand but in the end pragmatism wins the day. It actually makes no sense to me that someone would eschew science and knowledge. Seems a bit arrogant to me.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)nt