2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumJust something interesting I noticed...
Do you see that Hillary Clinton has nearly the same amount of a lead in points over Bernie as Bernie has points?
I was thinking that maybe he should just suspend his campaign? What do you think?
Hillary is obviously going to win, and I'm sure she prefers O'Malley over Sanders as VP... We could see the end of this thing by December if he dropps out and have all that extra time to BEAT THE REPUBLICANS!!!
randys1
(16,286 posts)Bernie is gonna fight to the end, whenever that is.
If she is the ultimate winner, and the Hillary hate isnt strong enough to give the GE to the terrorists, we will see how effective the movement is in that how much of their issues does she adopt.
The supporters of Bernie have a job to do if Hillary wins, and that is to support her and encourage her to do what Bernie would have done.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Calling Bernie Sanders supporters or Bernie Sanders 'BS' is childish and insulting.
Bernie is in it for the long haul and so are his supporters. We knew this would be a tough race when he was polling at single digits. Now he is somewhere around 30% nationally and leading in New Hampshire. Why would we give up?
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)and that is no more corrupt Oligarchy. Clinton is one of them she is with corporate agendas and Oligarchy thought processes. I will not support her.
I do not understand that many think that those who support Bernie will go along with supporting Hillary because it's the dems way. But the two candidates are like apples and oranges. Bernie supporters are supporting him for many reasons that have to do with changing the corruption we are living in while Hillary goes along with the status quo because she is the status quo.
frylock
(34,825 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Response to bravenak (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)mean little in the long run to a political party's objectives.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)No one should be placing any faith in polls. People that do at this point are obvious novices.
Have a nice day.
think
(11,641 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i remember she was a lock in 08 and we know what happened. there is plenty of time yet, and by every metric (number of donors, etc), bernie is ahead of where obama was at this time.
also, from a strategic point of view, a longer primary would be better for the dems. Because once the nominee becomes apparent whoever it is, the Republicans will have all that time to dig the dirt, smear the mud, and convince the American people that a socialist commie gun grabbing wacko wants to take over the country and kill their rights. a longer GE campaign means a lot longer time for the Republicans smear machine to be in operation.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)bernie is a TRUE progressive and that is why he is in even better shape than obama was at this time.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)And no amount of DWS is going to save Mrs. Clinton from voters under 35.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)PatrickforO
(14,569 posts)Bernie is even better, actually. I think the establishment, Clinton supporters, oligarchs and the corporate owned media organs might have a bit of a surprise coming.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Bernie fans cannot understand this for some reason, but they will, soon.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)If nothing else, Sanders continues to cause Clinton to make progressive noises. As soon as he drops out, Clinton's rightward sprint to the middle begins. figure if she spends a little more time in progressive territory, she might get semi-comfortable there.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)that she will sprint to the right in a general?
you have said before that both Hillary and Bernie are to your right. So I'm curious as to why you want the leftist of the left to wrap up his candidacy so early, especially since he is bringing so many labor and economic injustice issues into the national conversation and into his campaign.
as to the sprint to the right comment made by the other poster, I really don't believe that Hillary can win a general election, but if she has any chance at all, she will have to appeal to center right candidates who have a strong capitalist bent and don't mind military action. it would really be her only option in a general.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)the edge of the earth.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)and nice flat earth refernce.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They lost the Gov to an independent who is a 'the party left me' kinda ex republican. The dem linked up with him and now the repubs are floundering. They had full control. They broke our bank and bankrupted us. This is happening all over. We can take it all back. They may hate dems, but I was talking to a rightie (they love me, dunno why) and she likes Clinton and Carson but thinks Trump is a phoney and a leftist and she would rather have a regulart democrat than a fake republican. What?!?! Purely anecdotal but Trump is not everybodies idea of a republican. She was mad at the party for letting him run, called them sell outs. Plus she wants a woman prez.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i also notice that the person you talked to likes carson hmmmmmm...is your state particularly religious and do you think carson has an edge there?
also she wants a women pres but is not on board with fiorina.... another hmmmmm
bravenak
(34,648 posts)If I look out my window, I can see two facing each other. Carson will win here if he is the nominee. Doctor? Religious? Stabbed a guy but repented? Oh yeah. They love repentance and we all love knives and we have alcoholism so we understand fits of violence.
She thinks Fiorina cause her company to lose money and jobs. And kinda like a woman Trump she said.
You should see the bumperstickers. My god. Anti abortion, with a dead fetus in full color, econimic freedom decals, yes on pebble (pollution pollution pollution), no on weed... She gave me free concert tickets and tickets to the van gogh exhibit for my kids, tho. Nice lady. Interesting politics.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)although the place sounds less conflicted than the person. sounds like a bastion of wingnuttery. soooooo glad i have never seen any of the fetus bumper stickers. nra i am used to even though i don't like them..dead fetuses....don't think i could get used to seeing those in the local grocery.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Hippies and oil drilling.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)This is SUCH an epic comment
bravenak
(34,648 posts)This is a strange place.
npk
(3,660 posts)So if she doesn't move to the center she has no chance. HC can only move so far to center right anyway, as her husband had perhaps the narrowest angle on that ground and he barely got elected. Bernie would likely have to move to the center also, but it's doubtful that he would be able to make that slide in such a short amount of time, given his current far left stance. HC might be the best candidate of the two, but in another way she might be the only candidate that can pick up the more moderate conservatives that value conservative economics an socially liberal ideology. The more HC move to the center the more electable she becomes, but at the same time the more far left progressives will consider her to be abandoning their principals. It's quite the interior battle within the party.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)His current voters would drop him like a rock if he went 'Hillary' on us. The whole reason he's got the support he has is that he ISN'T in the center. Such a move would cost him 90% of the support he has now.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but honestly I don't think it matters because she can't win a general election anyway. Not only will many many disenfranchised progressives probably stay home or vote green or write Bernie's name, she will get zero Republicans to vote for her. In fact they will crawl over broken glass during the middle of a snowstorm to vote against her. That's how much they hate her. Bernie on the other hand is not only garnering the interest of millions of young people, he has tremendous crossover appeal and has support within the Republican Party and Young Conservatives. So it really doesn't matter we can talk about Hillary strategy all day long, she's probably not even going to be in the general election so it's probably moot. and unfortunately if she does make it to the general election they will be a president Trump. But you're right about the fight within the party, and that's exactly why many disenfranchise people would stay home or not vote for the Democratic candidate. We are sick and tired of people singing the right tune just to get our support during the primaries and then completely abandoning us for the general. Bernie doesn't have to move to the center, because his ideas and policies are exactly what people are responding to. And they know from him, it's genuine. They know he's not gonna change his mind when he gets to the White House. That's the problem with moving left and right to try to get votes. Everyone sees the game you're playing.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Which is another reason I want to put the most progressive and forward thinking candidate in as the nominee.
One of many reasons I support Sanders.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And I support Hillary and O'malley because of their connection to the african american community and how inclusive their supporters are to my group. They magnify our voices and help defend us from cries of race baiter and online harassment. Good group.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Autumn
(45,026 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Autumn
(45,026 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)He is extremely positive for building up the party. He speaks to the concerns we all care about. Just because he won't win, doesn't mean there is no room for him. A small percentage of the youth at his events will actually register to vote and start to support democrats. Don't let his supporters here fool you into thinking all of his supporters view both parties as the same. Many of these young people tuned in to the republican debate just to watch Trump. That is a difference this time than when Kucinich was running. Many of his supporters have seen the republicans. Many also got to watch Hillary at the hearings and debate, somewhat hoping the worse as they want Sanders to win. Fully acceptable thought to hold in my opinion. What they saw was an amazingly impressive progressive. More are going to stick around in the party this time. Don't get me wrong, it won't be a lot. But I do think it will be more than in past elections just because of how this one is going down.
He is working hard every day to build the democratic party. I support that.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)msongs
(67,381 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Did you watch the debates? He acquitted himself very well as a democrat. He is going all around the country talking about issues we care about and is doing so as a democrat. The party is working with him and using his name to build funds. I'm not sure the direction to your question because it seems extremely obvious to me. Of course much of what he is doing is "promoting himself," as you say. That isn't the whole story.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I think Bernie is in this to push the debate to the left. I think he will stay in as long as he can afford to do that.
The final straw will be when his supporters throw him under the bus. Given their internet antics it is only inevitable.
Hillary will be President and Sanders will remain in the Senate. Hopefully we win back the Senate so Hillary and Bernie can work together on the issues talked about in the primary.
As far as his supporters go, some will vote for Hillary in the general and remain active others will drop out and remain ineffectual.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But I agree that pulling us to the left on economics is important. And hopefully the election season good better than we expect, republicans are floundering, we do not need to be complacent. We can beat the tar out of them if we stand together and fight.,
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Another reason I like his campaign continuing. The electorate and party are currently rallying around one person. Hillary is building clout, regardless of the Sanders campaign.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I also think Sanders will have more of a voice in the Senate after this, which is a good thing.
Mark Grable
(23 posts)But doesn't know why.
Bernie Sanders, on the other hand, has a progressive agenda to implement.
Hillary is for sale. She will take money from any Super PAC. Same as the Republicans.
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)postatomic
(1,771 posts)I just hope that BS holds to his promise to not run as an Independent. The Republicans are hoping and praying that he does. I've noticed a few "threats" to write his name in if he's not on the General Election ballot.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I used to stomp my feel and have mini tamtrums. Never worked.
randys1
(16,286 posts)but if they have that attitude about him, what happens when , NOT IF, Bernie is unable to do 99% of what he campaigns on due to the makeup of the house and senate?
Do these avid BERNIE OR BUST folks sit on their hands in future elections?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It really does.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)but will for Bernie.
I got the strong impression he won't vote for Hillary even if she gets the nomination.
I could be wrong of course.
frylock
(34,825 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)we will all work just that much harder to prevent the terrorists from taking over
frylock
(34,825 posts)I may not vote for the candidate that you'd like me to, but I'll be at the polls in November. Good luck in your endeavors.
randys1
(16,286 posts)to hear about it here
frylock
(34,825 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)how their actions hurt others, I should be registering someone to vote.
frylock
(34,825 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Just a suggestion if you really care about the support of his suppoters.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I still see 'shillary' and 'race baiter' used and recived no apologies to the aa group for using thees terms to describe them. What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)As an adult I expect people to be responsible for their own language. I don't use broad generalizations about supporters of any group as the basis for a political decision. I base it on policy.
When I see someone say something I disagree with I call it out. I am not on here as frequently as some people and have not seen as much of either of those terms.
I did see something about the later term in 2008, but I think it was in a slightly different context.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Or shoukd they have checked the members of the group and made sure not to give them impression that they were okay with it. Perhaps if you checked them on their behavior like you just did to us, we might not see it as hypocritical of you to come here to do this but ignore the nasty on your sude. I still have seen no apologies from that group to the aa group.
Since you are not here often, perhaps you should go back to July 21 abd Aug 8 and read what they had to say about blm and many others.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)The members of "the group?"
I do check people on their behavoir when I see it. I am not on as much as a lot of the people here.
I think it is odd to choose a candidate based on yahoos on the internet rather than policy, but that is your choice.
I can tell you I have actual contact with hordes of Bernie supporters here in real-life Minnesota and there really isn't any carryover of the kind of content you describe here. I usually dismiss a lot of what I see on the internet though.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Same condescension and paternalism. And they are younger than me and barely out of high school. Some are older, but still believe me to be uninformed and need their assistance on how to think properly.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)You have my word to go on and I have yours.
I do not believe people that are supporting Hillary are bad, some of my friends support her. I think they are wrong about a number of key issues or I think they haven't looked closely enough at the policies involved. Some of them think I am probably a bit full of myself but that feeling isn't isolated to any particular ethnicity within my circle of friends. (nor is it isolated to presidential politics, I am arrogant.)
I think the problem of having a candidate most people have never heard of is that you sometimes feel you have to break down each position and discuss it.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Thinking louder means better and being scared to run off any supoort even if it is bad support. Up here, a bunch of ron paul babies are the ones who are the biggest bernie supporters and they do all the talking and nobody says boo to them. They get to do whatever they want, say whaever they want, act however they want, because there is no structure that says they can't. But people cannot overlook that stuff just to give Bernie their vote. He has to be a leader and tell people what the rules of engagement are so that the group can know and be able to cite the rules and remove bad actors. Nothing can be done now. Too late. It us at the point where the stuff I have been saying for months is now being discussed by the media because they are revieving the same treatment of twitter bombs and page trolling and they say harassment.
I found a call to action where they were telling fans to spend hours posing on black pages like spam for Bernie. Not cool, blacks are already complaining. We complain and they say, why let people on the internet bother you? Because they are stiil doing it and think they are DOING GOOD WORKS.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)I also don't know anybodies race or ethnicity on the internet. Anyone can claim anything. I don't know of these black sites or the people that post on them.
I can only base my decisions on policy and ideas. That is ultimately all I have. That is all I can confirm and ultimately that is all I expect of my representatives. I live in Keith Ellison's district in Minneapolis and my name is Ken.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'm Bianca. I think everybody knows that by now after the letters that 'du bernie fan' sent to my house. I don't really know who sent those nasty letters bt I know that they really wanted to get me off du and call me a race baiter so badly that they sent TWO letters to wrong addresses and they were routed to me.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)And I am sorry it happened to you and feel shame at anyone that would resort to such actions.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)postatomic
(1,771 posts)But if it offends you or others I'll try my best to type out Bernie Sanders. I get a bit confused with all these abbreviations. For example; I'm still not sure what a PUMA is. Or is it a who/whom rather than a what?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It feels like an endearment to shorten a persons name to me.
Isn't puma 'party unity my ass'? And 'people united means action'?
postatomic
(1,771 posts)But I'm not sure. And I'll quit using BS.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)I honestly never liked the 'BO' abbreviation either, back in 08 it felt like a lot of people were trying to say Obama stinks or something.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)It was just my impression at the time and it was being used in 2007 and 2008 by people that really, really didn't like then Senator Obama.
jfern
(5,204 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)okay.
But I thought h supporters liked "fighters". It is still before the first primary, a little early to pack up and go home for candidates who feel convictions for where they stand on the issues.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)And anger. No hope.
artislife
(9,497 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)but I will be thinking over this new O'Malley meme while I drive.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Ian56 · 2 days ago
Lawrence Lessig is running for President in 2016 on campaign finance reform He was shut out of #DemDebate
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/article/2015/10/27/larry-lessig-power-lunch/
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)If O'Malley could beat her I would maybe vote him, but since he cannot then I want him for VP. If Ellison was running I'd vote him.
artislife
(9,497 posts)It is still early.
You seem unafraid of fighting for what you want and believe in. You have it in you to stand for what and who speaks for you the most. His supporters would love your help and they aren't mean like us. You could throw the election his way, who knows.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I am a good fighter. In many ways. But this fight was brought to my door so I am going to win.
If Hillary were not in he would be winning. The black vote would go either to him or Hill. I vote black and fight for black. His supporters are lovely and it makes him look even better. I will be proud to vote for the ticket with him on it. He increases the value to me. I am thinking they will team up regardless so I am fine with going for the default.
The definition of floundering must have changed. He is polling near 30% in most polls and will be going up. He is winning in New Hampshire. Winning any state will help him.
If you actually want O'Malley he will have to take second place in New Hampshire. Knocking Bernie to second place will not do anything for O'Malley. Taking Hillary down to third place disrupts the election and opens things up.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Hillary will win because she knows how to make alkiances. Has good relations with black voters as do her supporters. Can Bernie say the same? Then he will not win any southern state from her, nor the west, nor the eastern seaboard white has a high population, states like New York. What can Bernie offer?
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)But do it for the right reasons. Do it based on policy and what you know about whatever candidate you choose, not about a bunch of yahoos on the internet that are easily stoked to anger by other yahoos.
Just saying he cannot win in certain states isn't really fair. If Bernie was so completely pointless then why did everyone in the last debate (well except Webb) seem to be adopting a lot of his language on economics?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)There has never been a politician in america that aimed policies towards blacks. It's always a little for us and a lot for them. We always get crusts and would under his plan because of the mass incarceration problem leaving our men out. He voted for that just like she supported it. Who is better?
His message on economics is aimed at you, not me. It is not targeted to lift up groups that have been left out so many times, it does not include reparations, nothing to address poverty specifically on reservations or native villiages, I am way leftier than both of them. He does not address the fact that we have defacto separate but equal and will not benefit as much as white from free college because drug felons often cannot get financial aid or food stamps, and our schools do not educate the student to where they coukd actually succeed in college after their terrible education. His message leaves many of us out, but his supporters think we should be satisfied.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Raising the minimum wage to 15 helps everyone.
Free healthcare for all helps everyone.
Free public universities and community college helps everyone.
When you offer this free to all and available to all you don't need to target anything.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)I am out of school already, I have a secure union job with a decent wage, and I work for an HMO which means I get amazing health benefits.
On all three of those scores I am covered. I support Bernie because I want to have everybody else given better pay, free healthcare, and free education.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Top 90th percentile. Never need to study, photographic memory. Does not help me at all. I go to clas for math once a month just to turn shit in and move on. I have heath care, my daughter is in the gifted program (thanks mom and dad!) my husband has a high iq as well. Does nothing for me. My school pays me to go. So, it helps whites more than blacks then. Our schools do not get us to the level of being able to succed in college. More unemployment, they don't get that 15 bucks. More in prison, they get nothing! Nore single mothers with men in prison, nothing for them! Medicines and studies done mostly on white men, the meducines do not work as well on us, tec, etc,etc. so....
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)The school situation is difficult. That is going to take some serious revolution to fix. Most of the funding is based on racist/classist funding systems worked exclusively around local taxation. Changing state laws to force all taxation for education to be dispensed equally by a per student capita basis is the only solution. Everyone sinks or swims together that way. It is harder to work on a national level but there is a role for the federal government there too.
As far as unemployment goes Sanders supports new deal style job programs to fix our infrastructure.
Ending private prisons would kill the stupid three strikes rules and mandatory minimums that have packed our prisons and given all the power to DAs seeking to make a name for themselves with conviction rates.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I'm sorry, but you're not 'voting strategically' when your reason for choosing candidates is whether or not their supporters are 'nice to you'. You haven't said that Hillary addresses any of the things that you say Bernie is deficient on. You don't complain about her for the same reasons you complain about him, even though they're the same on those things. In short, you look for reasons to proclaim him 'bad' because other people were mean to you. That's personal voting, emotional voting, not 'strategic voting'.
If you really want to be 'strategic', then be honest and don't attack him for anything you don't attack her on when they're the same. Denounce both of them for failing to live up to the standards you feel O'Malley is better on. Don't pretend you're being strategic when you're voting on hurt feelings.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Cause I have to admit, given how I've got pretty much every Hillary supporter on ignore at this point, I imagine I wouldn't see it if you were attacking her in response to any of their questions.
It just seems like apart from the candy corn, every one of your OP's I've seen since you got back has been anti-Bernie. Haven't stumbled across any of the anti-Hillary ones. I realize you were treated pretty crappy by some Bernie folks, but if neither of them is living up to your standards, I would have expected to see some OPs about how she sucks too.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I decided what I did. I Am very serious about creating an inclusive environment. Both are way to the right of me, so on policy, meh, both are weak. So who to choose? The one who has the best environment for black people. The reason I bring it up over and over is to school people who think that we will over look their bad attitudes for the love of policy that they love. It will help next time so they creat a more welcoming atmosphere and not lose. They do not think it is necessary to be inclusive in order to bring in more voters. They are wrong and I am letting them know why they are missing those black voters who they feel should be on team Bernie.
Also. People keep telling me to be nice to bernie while they are still nasty to me so I just have to let them feel how it feels to have their feelings disregarded. The same folks wanting me to shut up about Bernie never had a nice thing to say about obama, that along with the treatment of blacks is suspect to me. They also cannot stand our aa group.
I feel like as long as i'm being polite, it should be aokay for me to write these. I really do not care who wins from my biew, they are way to the right of me and closer to each other than they are to me.
But Bernie did not plan on doing this well and did not set up an organization that can give direction to his army to chill out.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)In which case the strategic question is not whether Hillary or Bernie is in the WH, but how bad life is going to suck under President Trump. But we'll wait and see, I guess.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)We have the population centers with the larger vote shares. Just taking the states tgat are already ours we don't need much more to win. She'll have it in the bag before they call California. Reublicans do not know how to appeal to the nation as a whole. They couldn't even beat the black guy and they also sound crazy.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)Otherwise Trump or Carson would be the chosen
nominee. I doubt that either one will be the one.
Too many questions need to be asked from
our candidates. The issue of wars has not been
fully discussed, especially with our new policy
with "boots on the ground" in Iraq and probably
Syria. Where do they stand with regards to the
Ukraine?
There are also domestic problems, which have not
been discussed seriously. Big Pharma, medical
marihuana and others.
No, we had only ONE debate, and we need far more.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)She doesn't have the best interests of working people as her top priority.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I bet if I took my daughters to see her, they would love her. They need to see someone who looks like them as prez. She actually resembles my mother in law alot. Same blonde hair, same size, very forthright, very confident, intelligent, talented, good mother. Wonderful grandmother. Yes. Hillary needs to kick butt for me. I will kick butt for her since her supporters so lovingly took me in when I needed a group after being rejected.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)I'm not a black child so i won't.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)But I'm most interested in what's good for MY grandchildren, and that most certainly ISN'T Hillary Goldman Sachs Clinton. So I'll be voting for someone else.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Am I supposed to be all pissed off or something?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)not getting a nibble. People are drawn to me. You came here, right? Nibble nibble.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)though, I think she'd be better off with someone from a Southern, or South-Western state.
Sid
No. O'Malley. Yes. Bernie is AWESOME in the Senate!! Ask anybody here!!
William769
(55,144 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Mark Grable
(23 posts)Bernie is ahead in New Hampshire.
William769
(55,144 posts)Hillary will have it wrapped up by Super Tuesday.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)winner even before Bernie started campaigning poor old Bernie should of not been allowed to even try to muster up a campaign.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Perhaps Bernie did not spend time building coalitions and relationships. He has few endorsements because of the lack of coalition building. He does not know how to push his support in a direction that will benefit him. He seems very hands off. Besides, he is kinda depressing.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)you couldn't tell?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)and the laugh, it was getting a little nasty in here
bravenak
(34,648 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
DianeK
(975 posts)or new to observing the political process...just sayin' things have a way of changing very quickly and very dramatically..buckle up..this is not over yet
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Now, Bernie has no black support virtually, how does he change this? He did not build a coalition, he is not embracing Obama and will not get that coalition of voters, Republicans will not switch parties to vote in our primaries, so wise one, how? Force of will?
Remember, black voters are the ones who stand in line for hours to vote and ensure their csndidate wins, why shoukd they go do so for Bernie rather than Hillary? Many are already upset over the harassment of BLM by peopke whi called themselves his grassroots. How does he steal voters from her that are no keen on joining his group? He may as well give it up.
DianeK
(975 posts)Clinton arrogance is showing ..this is a marathon..not a sprint...cliche perhaps..but true...in the end we all have to come together to support whomever secures the nomination..it is still early..we have a long way to go..much too early for arrogance
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)fadedrose
(10,044 posts)It ain't over till the fat lady or the FBI sings
bravenak
(34,648 posts)fadedrose
(10,044 posts)What the hell are you laughing at?
I find the whole situation pathetic and can't understand how loyalty can drive people to the lengths HC supporters are demonstrating.
You supporters are okay, many I like, but I can't like HC and I have tried. There are polls that show she is unlikeable and untrustworthy, and I am living proof that such polls exist.
Sorry.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You figure that out and I'll stop.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)It's just a person who doesn't like you or Clinton and is not acting out of love for anyone.
Please ignore them.
I'm a Bernie supporter, and I promise I will be polite in all responses to you.
Sorry.
Mike Nelson
(9,951 posts)...and they unite at the end - then work together to defeat the unacceptable alternative.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,974 posts)And Clinton/O'Malley as a team--awesome!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)That gap between them is growing and I see O'Malkey and I wanna keep him around. Bernie has a Senate job that apparently he is the best ever at in the history of the world, why give that up? He should just kindly slide on off the campaign trail and let us have our team.
ismnotwasm
(41,974 posts)We have a hell of s fight coming up and I want to see the most qualified people fighting it. I started researching O'Malley because of DU--and I'm very impressed. I love that guy.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)But I think after the next two debates, after his numbers drop, he will come to reason.
Then our tear it up crew can beat the crap outta the republicans. Real Democrats know that the republicans are too crazy to even give them a chance to win.
ismnotwasm
(41,974 posts)He's not a bad guy, I don't think --he does seem politically naive for all his years in congress, and I don't believe that perception. He has to have political savvy. He would be a total asset in the GE as a motivating figure, he could help heal the Democratic Party wear it's hurting right now
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Hillary's got the nomination on lockdown.
Bernie's poll numbers are a joke.
Thats why the berniebros are freakin out all over this board LOL
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Obama had the type of personality that made it so he was able to get those endorsements. There is no comparison.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)or so after all his years in politics.
That speaks volumes about the man I would say.
Cha
(297,047 posts)I don't really care what Bernie does.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,974 posts)That would be a nice thing for him to do
Cha
(297,047 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Hillary would never have passed up a chance like this for a good photo op
http://www.bustle.com/articles/117535-sandra-blands-mother-says-its-what-bernie-sanders-didnt-do-after-they-met-that-earned-her
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251689905
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)As Hillary herself pointed out, Bobby Kennedy was leading in June of 1968 but didn't get the nomination (wink, wink).
I knew it was only a matter of time until Hillary supporters started calling on Sanders to drop out in the name of party unity. The Party Unity My Ass crowd has now become the party unity at all costs camp.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)... the rest of us do.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251610020
jfern
(5,204 posts)I guess he should have suspended his campaign since no one was going to elect a 1 term black Senator from Chicago.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Olus the black vote started coming his way and he was a positive candidate. Not dour. Blacks do not do gloom and doom and everything sucks.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)and I thought she had floated Julian Castro as her VP, but for just now we'll keep going with Bernie and after all if he's so no threat what's to lose?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)tblue37
(65,273 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)I also want Mrs. Clinton to have him as VP if she wins. She will always be a moderate, just like President Obama. I think it is important to have a progressive VP who isn't afraid to speak up for 'the people'.
They would make a very good team.