Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSlate's Fred Kaplan: Condoleezza Rice Has a Lot of Nerve
Condoleezza Rice Has a Lot of Nerve
The former secretary of state presided over a failure. She has no business lecturing Obama on international politics.
By Fred Kaplan
Thursday, Aug. 30, 2012
Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice speaks at the Republican National Convention on Aug. 29, 2012
Photo by Stan Honda/AFP/GettyImages.
To watch Condoleezza Rice, the face of George W. Bushs foreign policy, stand before a convention of cheering Republicans and condemn Barack Obama for diminishing Americas standing in the worldone can only gasp at the magnitude of chutzpah in one woman.
After describing a world of freedom fighters and tyrants, Bushs former secretary of state and national security adviser lamented, Everyone asks, where does America stand? Indeed that is the question of the hour, she continued, for when friends or foes alike dont know the answer to that question, unambiguously and clearly, the world is likely to be a more dangerous and chaotic place We cannot be reluctant to lead, and you cannot lead from behind.
The solution, she concluded, is to elect Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan. They know what to do, she said. They know that our friends and allies must again be able to trust us.
First, its not at all clear that they have the slightest idea what to do or evenjudging from Romneys disastrously tin-eared trip to Europe this summerhow to think about what to do.
Second (this is the chutzpah part), Condi Ricea top adviser in the most disastrous, reputation-crippling foreign-policy administration in decadeshas no business lecturing anybody on this score.
more...
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2012/08/condoleeza_rice_s_foreign_policy_record_in_george_w_bush_s_administration_pales_in_comparison_to_what_barack_obama_s_administration_has_accomplished_.html
The former secretary of state presided over a failure. She has no business lecturing Obama on international politics.
By Fred Kaplan
Thursday, Aug. 30, 2012
Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice speaks at the Republican National Convention on Aug. 29, 2012
Photo by Stan Honda/AFP/GettyImages.
To watch Condoleezza Rice, the face of George W. Bushs foreign policy, stand before a convention of cheering Republicans and condemn Barack Obama for diminishing Americas standing in the worldone can only gasp at the magnitude of chutzpah in one woman.
After describing a world of freedom fighters and tyrants, Bushs former secretary of state and national security adviser lamented, Everyone asks, where does America stand? Indeed that is the question of the hour, she continued, for when friends or foes alike dont know the answer to that question, unambiguously and clearly, the world is likely to be a more dangerous and chaotic place We cannot be reluctant to lead, and you cannot lead from behind.
The solution, she concluded, is to elect Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan. They know what to do, she said. They know that our friends and allies must again be able to trust us.
First, its not at all clear that they have the slightest idea what to do or evenjudging from Romneys disastrously tin-eared trip to Europe this summerhow to think about what to do.
Second (this is the chutzpah part), Condi Ricea top adviser in the most disastrous, reputation-crippling foreign-policy administration in decadeshas no business lecturing anybody on this score.
more...
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2012/08/condoleeza_rice_s_foreign_policy_record_in_george_w_bush_s_administration_pales_in_comparison_to_what_barack_obama_s_administration_has_accomplished_.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1944 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Slate's Fred Kaplan: Condoleezza Rice Has a Lot of Nerve (Original Post)
flpoljunkie
Aug 2012
OP
she and bush thought Muammar Gaddafi was a good leader and friend of theirs'
Angry Dragon
Aug 2012
#2
Cha
(297,137 posts)1. Sure as hell didn't!
Now that want to repeat that disaster and Lying and Begging the American people to give them a chance to do it again.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)2. she and bush thought Muammar Gaddafi was a good leader and friend of theirs'
theinquisitivechad
(322 posts)5. Well. . .
Gaddafi definitely wanted to be a friend of hers. . .if you know what I mean. . .
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/10/more-horrendously-creepy-details-about-qaddafis-condoleezza-rice
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)3. Have they no sense of shame?
How dare they try to pull this shit again.
flpoljunkie
(26,184 posts)6. Obviously, they do not.
I hope Colin Powell was listening to Condi's lies and obfuscations. It would help if he again endorsed President Obama.
GallopingGhost
(2,404 posts)4. QUICK!!!
Let's invade South Korea!!!