2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumH.A. Goodman is a deluded clown and he doesn't represent most Sanders supporters
Deliberately trying to conflate him with supporters is loathsome bullshit.
It's as ugly as trying to conflate Hillary supporters with the columns by Froma Harrup, a pro-Hillary deluded clown who calls Bernie a racist because some Clinton supporters posted her noxious crap in support of Hillary.
That said, it should be obvious by now, to even the most fervent Sanders supporter that Goodman is full of shit. He is an embarrassment and I wish my fellow Sanders supporters wouldn't post his crap.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)So I'm not buying it
cali
(114,904 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)That includes "Message Removed"
And some examples:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251495657
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251959649
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251605672
http://www.democraticunderground.com/128069092
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251728212
215 Recs: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251932647
12 Minutes ago: http://www.democraticunderground.com/128091785
And it doesn't include results like this:
boston bean
(36,221 posts)He's only been posted, copied, linked to here many many times, with people oohing and aawwing over his screeds against Hillary Clinton.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)makes him say really stupid stuff.
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)but thanks for saying it. It's getting to where one needs hip-waders to get around the loathsome bullshit that gets posted here.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)the posting of H.A.G. articles on DU by your fellow Sanders supporters. Such posts do harm to their candidate's chances, I believe. And yet, his mewlings are posted here daily almost. It makes one wonder whether those who post them are truly supporters or, perhaps, people with other motivations.
cali
(114,904 posts)calling Sanders a racist. Quite a bit of that. Perhaps I missed your criticism of it.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)times here. His support for civil rights over the decades is well known. You will not find me referring to him as a racist. Anyone who calls him one is simply wrong, and I have said that as well.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)where I clearly state that Sanders is not a racist:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251744349#post1
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=753482
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026737441#post247
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)opponents. "It's not US -- it's THEM!"
As for some of Bernie's DU supporters damaging his reputation by eagerly mining slimy sources for absolutely any garbage they imagine is pro-Bernie/anti-Hillary, what's new?
IF I wanted to work to get Bernie elected, I'd separate myself from these people as much as possible. I'd only post good things about him and his policies, and only discuss him and his policies with sensible supporters -- when I wasn't out passing around fliers I'd printed out with the same messages.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)racist would just stop already.
A lot of AAs are turned off by Sander's criticism of President Obama. Hey I used to love Bernie's appearances on MSNBC until he started shitting on my President, the current leader of the DEMOCRATIC Party. Then in 2012, he wanted to primary my beloved President. Just like Sanders' supporters go on and on about HRC's Iraq vote, I cannot support a primary candidate who wanted to primary my beloved President, the greatest President, EVAR!
freedom fighter jh
(1,782 posts)This election thing may be full of double agents on both sides.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)articles of his where he is not too far out - one could miss where he is coming from. He is not a household name after all. Most people would have never heard of him - at least until recently.
If one did not know who Pat Buchanan was and was not familiar with his over all history - a few of his articles would have sounded just fine to most progressives. But he is a very well known figure who is almost a household name. I can't even find a bio on H.A. Goodman on Wikipedia.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Perhaps that is not his real name. That's always a possibility. He's very popular with some, though, it seems. Confirmation bias is a strong force in politics.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)H. A. Goodman is an author and journalist who studied International Relations at USC and worked for a brief stint at the U.S. Department of State's Foreign Service Institute. He's been published in Salon.com, the Jerusalem Post, Chicago Tribune, The Hill's Congress Blog, the Roanoke Times, and various other publications throughout the country. Goodman is also the author of Breaking the Devil's Heart and Logic of Demons, a widely acclaimed series of existential fantasy novels.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/
comradebillyboy
(10,144 posts)that dirty old toe sucking dog.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)with a couple of books under his belt. I haven't read either of them, since he writes in a genre that doesn't interest me. After the election, perhaps he'll return to fictionalizing again, although he's doing a pretty good job of it during the campaign, too.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,681 posts)and haven't paid him any attention since. Every candidate has some fringe-y supporters and no campaign should be judged by a few loons who get too much attention. That goes for DU as well. I had to laugh when one DUer made a BFD out of switching his support from Bernie to Hillary because some Bernie people on DU were rude. Seriously? There are going to be a few oddballs, weirdos and jerks "supporting" all candidates. Some might be trolls; some might just be oddballs, weirdos or jerks. I would hope most people are capable of thinking for themselves but sometimes it doesn't seem that way.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)I just wish people would remember that DU, or any web forum, commenting section, etc. is not the country. Most people in America never ever post on the web. But they do vote.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)with the peculiarities of a certain group that's gathered together at DU under his name. One should always examine those a candidate's messages are appealing to, and why, of course, but in this case I really don't think this little mob's extreme dishonest and dysfunctional zealotry reflect Bernie's.
Yes, Bernie's something of an anti-establishment zealot himself, undoubtedly what attracted these people to him. But one only has to examine his solid Democrat voting record over 25 years to confirm that Bernie himself is able to keep at least one foot and half of the other in touch with...the context he has to work within. He's not nearly the barn-burning iconoclast they want him to be.
Response to cali (Original post)
NurseJackie This message was self-deleted by its author.
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)What's next? Bernie is a pervert and Hillary killed Vince Foster? Oh,wait, we had those memes already . . .
msrizzo
(796 posts)I read a couple of his articles and I thought he was over the top, but I'll take your word that he is a deluded clown and make sure to skip his stuff altogether in the future. And I know enough Sanders supporters in real life that I would never conflate him with Sanders supporters overall. But thanks for posting this.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... if that person is otherwise an asshat.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)But we have yet another post linking to his shit, almost right after you posting this.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251965051
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/in-2016-bernie-sanders-defeat-clinton-trump_b_8902400.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592&ref=yfp
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251965051
I never heard of H A Goodman until Bernie fans blanketed DU with his libertarian HS screeds, like the one above that's on General Discussion: Primaries right now!
George II
(67,782 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)So i don't get the OP saying most Bernie supporters are against him.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)She doesn't have neo-cons on her advisory board?
I don't see how he is factually wrong.
Tamyr
(7 posts)Goodman pretended Bill was referring to Obama's candidacy. He wasn't.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/why-bernie-sanders-will-become-the-democratic-nominee_b_7685364.html
Goodman said Clinton "was asked about Obama's record and chances of winning the presidency."
But Clinton was asked about the Iraq war, not Obama's chances to win. Goodman makes stuff up.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)Tamyr
(7 posts)And in glad toy don't dispute it.
By the way, do you think predicting O'Malley will get more votes than Hillary in Iowa qualifies as deluded or not?
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)Bill Clinton is no better than HA Goodman.
And anyone can say anything. Hell, we would be welcomed as liberators. You can say stupid shit. But when reality hits, it proves the speaker is an idiot.
Tamyr
(7 posts)Are you pretending I read all of Goodmans columns? and by the way you ignored the question about his delusion regarding OMalley beating Hillary in Iowa.
Answer.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)And if he think MOM will beat HRC, he needs evidence and not talking out of his ass. Then, when HRC beats MOM, we can look at HA Goodmn tell him he's stupid.
Problem solved. Remember, Dewey beat Truman.
Tamyr
(7 posts)And by what margin.
Then compare that to Clinton's lead vs. OMalley at the time Goodman made that prediction.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)if he thinks MOM will beat HRC, he needs evidence and not talking out of his ass. Then, when HRC beats MOM, we can look at HA Goodman and tell him he's stupid.
Problem solved.
Tamyr
(7 posts)GP6971
(31,141 posts)comparing polls over 60 years old. Nice try.
I'm all in for Bernie in the primary but I have been seeing this Goodman person here and there for months and cringing. Honestly, I hope he's right but he's just too silly.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Show me the material by Goodman that is so abhorrent that it makes his opinions and analysis unacceptable and we can talk about it. I've yet to see anything of substance against him except the fact that he wrote ONE article that embraced Paul's antiwar stance - a point any real Liberal ALSO agrees with Paul on.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)H. A. Goodman
Columnist published in The Cleveland Plain Dealer, The Baltimore Sun, The Hill, Salon, The Jerusalem Post
Posted: 11/17/2014 3:31 am EST Updated: 01/17/2015 5:59 am EST
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/im-a-liberal-democrat-im_b_6169542.html
wouldsman
(94 posts)and especially considering the timing of it, 2014, when Dems did not know if there would be a peace candidate available for us to support.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)It is one thing to say that one happens to agree with Rand Paul on certain specific issues - it is quite another to announce that they are voting for him.
Personally, I never heard of him before. You can't even find a bio on him on Wikipedia. I suspect most people who post or rec. articles by him don't know his over all politics. At the very least, he is a bit of a flake.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)guy before reading his pro Bernie articles on Huffington Post.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)However, as a supporter of Hillary's corporatist prewar agenda I can see how that kind of prioritization might cause you to be extremely confused.
Also, I asked if there was anything other than that ONE article with which to impeach Goodman's writings. I guess there isn't.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)OK.
wouldsman
(94 posts)I looked through this diary for actual differences of opinions on Goodman's positions. Instead all I see is name calling.
Maybe there is a grownup in the group who could do something besides attack the messenger?
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)His stealth republican garbage is all over this website.
wouldsman
(94 posts)I come to hear a wide variety of views and perspectives. I read a lot of stuff without ever bothering to find out who wrote it. Up until this thread I had not known who this Goodman fella was.
But thanks to this thread I now do. And whether I agree with him a little, mostly, or totally, what I do disagree with is ad hominem attacks.
Which this entire appears to be. Start to finish.
In an earlier post someone suggested that because this Goodman lied about something a Clinton said he should be completely disregarded. How about we completely disregard the Clintons knowing that they have lied about things? That doesn't really make sense now does it?
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)Bouncy cheers for being a distant second in polls, cherry picked stats.
My point is not judge Goodman's content, but to point out that there is enthusiastic support here by at least some Sanders supporters, despite the OP's claim.
I fail to see your "entire appears to be. Start to finish.". The criticisms that I see of Goodman have appeared to be based on the content of what he is publishing, not ad hominem attacks. I will admit that I have not read all that much of what he has published...
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)His articles get a lot of recs on DU.
He's your guy.
cali
(114,904 posts)See how that shit works?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)by Sanders supporters.
The same cannot be said for Froma Harrup's articles.
Pay attention and you might learn something.
onenote
(42,700 posts)His stuff and Morris' sound alike to me.
artislife
(9,497 posts)That is great by me.
Many people just scan the front page and inside their psyche they are letting in the idea that Bernie is electable. How many actually read the blog is another matter.
But it is a drip drip drip in the background and soon the idea of electing Bernie is not so far fetched.
It pisses off the h supporters and that is icing on the cake.
PADemD
(4,482 posts)Hardly a week goes by without some demand for an apology populating my inbox. I have never apologized for two reasons: The usual one is that I'm not sorry. The other is that calls for an apology have become an irritating tactic in American political discourse, a kind of bullying.
That doesn't mean I haven't regretted things I've said or the tone used. I have. So here's a compromise: I will issue one apology a year.
And the winner for 2015 is ... Bernie Sanders.
Why Bernie? Some liberal friends complain that I've been overly dismissive of the senator from Vermont's candidacy. They have cause.
http://www.cdispatch.com/opinions/article.asp?aid=47235
brooklynite
(94,513 posts)...since his every word is frequently cited here.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,784 posts)Last edited Fri Jan 1, 2016, 04:38 PM - Edit history (1)
(and BTW, I'm a Bernie supporter)
He's the quintessential crybaby and self-righteous asshole who threatens to take his vote and stay home if Sanders does not win the nomination.
I challenged him on Salon back in mid-November with the notion that since Bernie Sanders himself has said that he would support Hillary in the general election if he didn't get the nomination, he should follow suit if he truly supported Sanders.
His response? He has since doubled down (no, wait, QUADRUPLED DOWN) on his previous stance.
http://www.salon.com/writer/h_a_goodman/
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)As far as equivalent nutbag Hillary partisan commentators I would add Amanda Marcotte along with Froma Harrup!
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)While Sanders supporters go out of their way to paint Hillary supporters as anti semetic, corporatist, RW rag ( Stormfront) loving idiots.
Not sure why you are suddenly all about the fairness issues?
JI7
(89,247 posts)They are more conspiracy tin foil hat types.
riversedge
(70,200 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)I'm guessing you're responding to this gem before the OP was removed:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251964796
I didn't see it, but I checked the Google cache and it is indeed vile, the sort of thing the VRWC has been cranking out for two decades. Here's the OP's tweet, in case anyone wants to lose their New Year's breakfast:
https://twitter.com/HAGOODMANAUTHOR/status/682600879200047110
Which is a link to this Drudge-inspired Salon article:
http://www.salon.com/2015/07/28/camille_paglia_how_bill_clinton_is_like_bill_cosby/
So "H.A. Goodman" is a branch of the VRWC? And spreads their vile anti-Clinton propganda? Who could have EVER predicted that?
cali
(114,904 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Rand is just some needful Republican and not in fact anything other than that. Plus, I am not a Huffington Post fan and that seems to be his regular haunt. That's not the best thing either.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)If people actually go to his posts, he provides hyper-links to prove everything he says.
His conclusions may be questionable, but his research is not.
blm
(113,047 posts)and I am so glad to see this post from you here. Both camps are furthering messages from obvious trolls, imo. Heated rhetoric from both camps provides a smokescreen for the operatives trolling here.
I have been saying for months now that the older DUers who have seen this type of trolling here since our first prez primary in 2003-4 cycle, need to put the brakes on this tactic being used here, yet again.
PS: Come back. ; )