2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFoster child steals the show at Hillary Clinton Derry, NH town hall-...beautiful Photo....
This is a moving example of why smaller crowds at Town Halls are so very important to Hillary. She listens and learns from the audience--people of all ages.
Tweet:
Joe Parisi and 116 others follow
Mashable Verified account @mashable 6h6 hours ago
Foster child steals the show at Hillary Clinton town hall http://on.mash.to/1JnDtH5
Foster child steals the show at Hillary Clinton town hall
Hillary Clinton greets a child as she arrives at a town hall campaign event on Jan. 3, 2016, in Derry, New Hampshire.
Image: AP Photo/Steven Senne
By Emily Cahn
6 hours ago
DERRY, New Hampshire A handful of young children stole the show at a Hillary Clinton town hall on Sunday, asking the Democratic front-runner poignant questions that got an emotional response from both the audience and Clinton herself.
After an hour-long stump speech, Clinton took questions from the audience gathered in the gymnasium at Gilbert R. Hood middle school. Three of those questions came from young children, who asked about everything from lifting folks out of poverty to helping children in foster care................
Clad in a pink-and-gray-striped sweater, the little girl broke into tears as she asked Clinton for her ideas to help other children in foster care like herself.
"First of all, I'm really sorry that happened to you," Clinton said, her voice low and with concern. "I'm very happy to hear you have somebody taking care of you that you feel that positive about. And I thank her for taking care of you.".......................
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)She has gone to the migrant camps looking for the children to help them get an education and health care.
cali
(114,904 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)mcar
(42,278 posts)Thank you, riversedge.
dinkytron
(568 posts)Maybe someone should tell her that Bernie is the candidate who wants to eliminate college tuition for her and other foster children and that he probably won't send her off to fight a senseless war.
oasis
(49,332 posts)She cannot contain her joy at having the opportunity to meet the most admired woman on the planet.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Sarah Silverman was there?????
oasis
(49,332 posts)dinkytron
(568 posts)parent that dragged the kid to the event does.
Response to riversedge (Original post)
Post removed
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)"I'm an adult,why am I posting something like this?". If not,you should.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)"Maybe banning people from the Hillary forum on a whim was NOT a Good Idea?" If Not, you should. Then we would NOT be having this discussion.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)on an internet site.I'm sure that's had a real effect on your life.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)When liberal people come to DU they expect to be met by liberal people so they don't screen every post they read. They don't even notice most of the time which subnormal or sub-forum the post is made on. They post happily for 12 years without any problems. Most of the time they post on the latest and greatest and don't bother filtering out all the specially protected sub-forums. Then suddenly, for daring to say, "power is NOT conservative by its nature," they get banned by Hillary supporters.
I bet this is happening to many, many DU members. I thinky they should have a voice. The majority of members here on DU are liberal and for Bernie. By creating a specially protected Hillary forum, AND banning people on a whim, you are alienating the majority of the DU membership. I think you are enjoying it. But there are a lot of people who really resent being banned. I bet even you with your ridicule and lack of empathy are capable of understanding this tiny feeling of someone else's.
So maybe you Hillary supporters should STOP BANNING PEOPLE ARBITRARILY.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)DU's policy on protected sub forums. I think people who get bent out of shape over getting booted from a sub forum need to get a real life. It's pathetic to obsess over this.
still_one
(92,061 posts)Response to sufrommich (Reply #28)
Post removed
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)fasttense
(17,301 posts)Because it really, really bugs you.
So.... go talk to all your Hillary supporters (there aren't very many of them) and get me UNbanned. I will stop then. And I promise NOT to post the truth on the Hillary forum again.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)gripe about being banned and not allowed to post on a positive piece in the Clinton group, while demanding they put this piece in the Clinton group? For real? Bah hahahah. What an odd way to approach a positive post about one of our Democratic candidates. And your expectation/demand of fellow Duers.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)You are really kicking and screaming about only being able to trash Hillary in the other hundred forums and groups on DU? You demand access to the Hillary Clinton group? A group where it's purpose is clearly stated: "Discuss the life, career, and accomplishments of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. Supporters only."
Are you serious right now? Why in the fuck would you even want to post in that group? Do you want to be known as a Hillary supporter on DU? Something tells me you don't want to post there to show your support.
If I'm wrong, my apologies in advance.
still_one
(92,061 posts)that Bernie or any President can promise what they want, but unless they have Congress on there side, nothing happens.
I got banned from the Elizabeth Warren forum for stating that she would not be running for President in 2016
I don't go "pouting" "what a bad idea" that was. Special forums and groups have their own rules, and in the case of political candidates are intended for supporters of those candidates.
Are you telling me you are a Clinton supporter?
If not, what are you winning about?
fasttense
(17,301 posts)Yeah, yeah, right, I've heard Hillary lovers say they were banned from the Bernie site but No One has ever given me a link or more to the point post the banning e-mail or the e-mail from the host explaining why you got banned. Then I'll believe you.
Are you insulting Me? I may have to alert on you. You know the rules right? No insults and "pouting" is dangerously close to an insult. Then I would have to alert on you for a reason unlike your favorite forum.
And to be fair I did tell the woman who banned me that I would NOT let this go and I would fight it. She thought I was funny and ridiculed me. So, if she doesn't mind why are all you Hillary supporters so upset about me posting my experience on the Hillary forum?
LiberalArkie
(15,703 posts)On Mon Jan 4, 2016, 08:43 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
What you want me to get off my high horse so you can take a ride?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=972691
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This is now getting ridiculous. Now threats? Is this Bob Conrad in some battery commercial daring you to knock the battery off his shoulder? Nice threats. Seems like somebody's desperate to start picking a fight. Why is this allowed?
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Jan 4, 2016, 08:51 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I see fasttense already got banned in this thread. So I'll leave it at that rather than pile on. And frankly will save me a lot of time looking at all the long back and forth to decide whose posts are worse, the alerter or the posts fasttense is reponding to, who started it, who crossed the line first and all that.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Do I want to read this stuff? No. But nothing is really over-the-top especially in comparison to the subthread.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
still_one
(92,061 posts)As for the threads I got banned from:
Here is the one from the Elizabeth Warren group:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1265&pid=2965
The one from the Bernie Sanders' group I self-deleted because of their decision to ban me, but you can see from the replies that there was no disagreement with what I had said:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=79281
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)"I'm an adult, why am I voting for Clinton?"
William769
(55,144 posts)nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Ready or not (for Hillary) here she comes!
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Calling the Hillary Group's subforum "sanitized"?
I just got banned from the BS Group for a trifle and the only reason I mention it here is to ask why you are snickering if not at the absurd notion that Hillary Supporters (of which I AM NOT ONE) are somehow overly sensitive and Sanders supporters aren't.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)I am assuming that some Bernie supporters don't have anything better to do than complain about little foster children who ask Hillary questions.
oasis
(49,332 posts)After 3/2, (Super Tuesday plus one) we can all enjoy an environment where we can turn our full attention to the defeat of Hillary's more formidable opponents.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)The growing desperation is amusing.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)complain about someone posting Uncomplimentary things about Hillary on their sacred DU site. Oh wait, DU does NOT all belong to Hillary supporters.
Go back to your specially protected Hillary forum. They are the only ones who want to see these kinds of posts.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Who's complaining?
What does a "little foster children who ask Hillary questions." have to do with anything except popularity contests?
Kissing babies is typical election theatrics. I wonder how staged this was?
I'm more interested in policy, not sentiment.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)So banning people from the Hillary group is cart blanch to ban the majority of members. And it was done on a whim. Ban me for things like: Hillary is a RepubliCON, Hillary is part of the oligarchy and is all but taking legalized bribery. Don't ban me because I think power is NOT inherently conservative and you think I just maybe am a Bernie supporter.
But you seem to just want to moan and groan about someone else enjoying my post so go on and pretend you are not a Hillary lover.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Edit- I defend her against the stupid crap Sanders supporters throw. In fact I resent the fact Sanders supporters so often put me in the position to do so.
But I do NOT argue against criticisms of Hillary Clinton that are valid.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)But I do NOT argue against criticisms of Hillary Clinton that are valid.
Oh, right. You just plainly misrepresent valid criticisms of Clinton by adding your own words to them. A clear example is your reply #15 here.
Nobody but you put yourself in that position, so please quit trying to put the blame on anyone else. It's cheap, obvious, and dishonest.
still_one
(92,061 posts)opposing candidates. There are enough real issues between the candidates to debate and discuss
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)As opposed to worrying about some little girl in a town hall? Sheesh!
fasttense
(17,301 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)And since it upsets you so much, I think I will re-post it in GDP. You really should spend more time worrying about Bernie and less time concerned about how Hillary's town halls are going.
still_one
(92,061 posts)jalan48
(13,842 posts)Now, just a few ribbon cutting ceremonies and I'm sold!
oasis
(49,332 posts)Thanks.
jalan48
(13,842 posts)uponit7771
(90,304 posts)jalan48
(13,842 posts)Polls and focus groups show American's are tired of candidates debating real issues.
uponit7771
(90,304 posts)Baby kissing helps
jalan48
(13,842 posts)SunSeeker
(51,516 posts)jalan48
(13,842 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Well, if you're gonna get smaller crowds anyway.....
SunSeeker
(51,516 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Thank you for posting
postatomic
(1,771 posts)Because of the unusual responses to this totally benign post.
Beautiful story and photo. Thanks for posting this.
BlueMTexpat
(15,365 posts)riversedge
(70,090 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)do not behave this way. I've never seen such tantrum throwing and bed wetting. Mortifying.
ismnotwasm
(41,967 posts)LuvLoogie
(6,935 posts)riversedge
(70,090 posts)had to leave for a while. I come back to see 2 more than snarky posts are hidden.
Really folks--DU is better that that (ugly hidden posts) on such a beautiful story.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)But, on the bright side ... before the end of March, we'll know for certain that Bernie has no path to the nomination. Their behavior will either improve, or they'll drift away to other websites. (Either one will be fine with me.)