2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOne big difference between Obama and Sanders...which is why you can't compare the two
Obama still had the backing of the establishment. Obama pretended to be a populist and an outsider but when he won the election, the façade came off. Obama even had his own personal billionaire backer, Penny Pritzker (member of the family who owns Hyatt Hotels and Royal Caribbean cruise lines) who had a net worth of $2 billion in 2008.
- http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/05/obamas-new-commerce-secretary-a-billionaire-chicago-hotel-magnate/275500/
Armstead
(47,803 posts)There were also several months of "will he or won't he?" speculation before he announced.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)How does a little known state senator with an undistinguished record land one of the biggest Political Plums in the Democratic Party...Keynote Speaker at the 2004 Convention?
Most Democrats would KILL for all that free Face Time in front thousands of cheering Democrats.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Sometimes his entire career trajectory feels like a subplot on The Good Wife.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)LexVegas
(6,059 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Oh my!
TM99
(8,352 posts)You know some of us PoC weren't that pleased that Obama was a New Dem.
LexVegas
(6,059 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)do not like the political philosophy that they espouse. It has not helped our communities and in fact done incredible harm to them.
I respect Obama infinitely more. He is at least blissfully free from the scandals and lies that surround Clinton.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)There. I can say that's the difference between you and me because...well, because.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)A billionaire but one with something of a conscience, too. Your trying to conflate the support of one rich person with Obama being a turncoat doesn't make sense.
Besides which, Obama is not running for re-election so I assume this is an indirect diss on Clinton.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,366 posts)attract any current Clinton supporters to jump into Bernie's corner instead. It's definitely not the way to attract those Dems who may be undecided but who are also proud of President Obama.
And that's exactly what must happen for Bernie to win the Democratic nomination.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)if I was Black and someone said that about my support of Obama
It would drive me right out of my fucking mind.
Especially given the history of BLACK and white in this country...
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... hero that's a rock thrower.
That call for Obama to be primaried in 2011 started way before 2011
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Don't be naive.
ms liberty
(8,572 posts)You should have realized by now that not many here can be convinced to change their candidate. Very few here are actually undecided enough to make this a venue for picking up support for a candidate, IMO. DU'ers are a bunch of committed political junkies who are opinionated and knowledgeable. Many think this is the room for an argument (I had to work in a Python reference somewhere ). A lot of us are here to gather news and information, and to discuss the issues. I've been here since 03, and I have never believed this was the place to convince someone to change candidates in a primary. Read what people post here about their own and other's primary candidates, go back in the archives and see what was posted in 04 and 08. It's kind of obvious to me that despite the occasional caveats, most of us know we're not here for that. DU is where we commiserate with each other, strengthen our arguments, and share and gather information to take and use IRL. I've seen this kind of comment before, and it always puzzles me.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... because Obama's popularty outside of the that bubble is steady
mahina
(17,642 posts)AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)keep it classy
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)I think talking about Obama's flaws is relevant. Obama is still a lot better than a Republican.
Hekate
(90,642 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 4, 2016, 11:01 PM - Edit history (1)
...but Obama will always be handy to those who demand miracles and are ready with the pitchforks when miracles fail to occur on time.
Very classy indeed.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)It's been a POTUS Barack Obama and former President Bill Clinton bashing kinda day
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)There is an anti-establishment movement within this country and Hillary is the antithesis of it.
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)I happen to think PBO was the best fucking president in my lifetime, and I'm 55. I simply cannot state what you can do with your supposed from the "left" smears.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... damn good.
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)he is one of the top 3 of all time as to effectiveness.
http://pleasecutthecrap.com/obama-accomplishments/
319 accomplishments
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... people get hides for that kind of stuff around here.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)You do know that, right?
You need to try harder. Try to find that inner deepness, that spiritual nirvana that only a true Democrat can attain. Not seeing it yet.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Many on DU share my level of disappointment with Obama.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)But it's true that Sanders is the real deal.
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)brush
(53,764 posts)and runs into the same obstructionism that Obama has faced.
Campaign promises dim and even fade to compromise (which will make the sniping from the left at Obama seem tame) when confronted with the reality of repugs doing everything they can to stop you and having the votes to do just that, and when Middle East/Israeli/Netanyahu sabotague problems flare up and the generals tell you you have to leave this program in operation or this debacle will happen and so on and so on and so on, and when single-payer bills never get out of committee and to the floor, and when the banksters tell McConnell and Ryan to shut down the government yet again if they gon't get favorable treatment.
All this of course happens after the first major but unofficial briefing where the corporate billionaires and the generals and CIA etc. tell you to don't rock the boat too much, stick with your pet domestic issues where there will be some leeway allowed but don't stop the flow of dollars into the MIC or there could be some JFK or MLK issues (yeah, you better believe that stuff happpens).
If he does as well as Obama, the best president in most of our lifetimes, I'll be happy.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)He wouldn't make center-right appointments. Obama campaigned on reaching out to Republicans, Obama campaigned, quite seriously, on putting republicans in his inner circle. It was terrible and was going to backfire. Obama had less than three months to do anything.
If Sanders had three months of Congress? Holy fucking shit.
brush
(53,764 posts)and learns from Obama's early mistakes of trying to work with the repugs (not knowing they had secretly, on his inaugural day in 2009, vowed to vote against everything he tried and make him a one term president), and moves swiftly to get whatever can be done in that short a time.
Our only hope is that Sanders has long enough coat tails that can sweep the many dems needed to win the House and Senate into office with him and not have to worry about trying to accomplish his whole agenda in a two-month window like Obama had, because the 2010 tricked-up, Tom Delay-gerrymandering of Congressional districts is still in effect.
In reality, there's not much chance of that happening so he'll have to figure out another way to get things done, much like Obama had to.
We can all go on and on and expound here about not wanting more tepid politics or another establishment candidate but we really have to face reality that until the 2020 Census and redistricting happens, there isn't much that can be done about the gerrymandering of Congressional districts that favor repugs. We all know that in 2014 dems got hundreds of thousands more total votes than repugs but because of certain manipulated districts stacked with enough repug voters, the republicans ended up in control of the House.
The Senate may be in play with Sanders' coat tails. Let's keep our fingers crossed but without both houses of Congress he'll be obstructed just as Obama has been, so again, I say if he accomplishes as much as Obama I'll be happy.
He's got my vote but I know what we're facing so I'm not thinking he's going bring about an immediate political revolution.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)wildeyed
(11,243 posts)Some people lack comprehension skills, I guess, because Obama was absolutely clear about being a centrist Democrat when he ran. And he was the keynote speech at the 2008 Democratic Convention, so yes, OF COURSE he had the backing of the establishment. Here, history lesson, watch it. It was AMAZING.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Populating his administration with hawks like Hillary Rodham Clinton, Obama has presided over new military engagements abroad while overseeing a draconian crackdown on national security leaks at home, Bartlett notes.
Meanwhile, Obama has pursued very conservative fiscal policies, Bartlett writes, signing a stimulus package that was far smaller than what experts and advisers like Christina Romer found would be necessary to really prime the nations economic pump. Moreover, Obama has conducted himself like a deficit hawk, proposing much deeper cuts in spending and the deficit than did the Republicans during the 2011 budget negotiations, when a deal eluded the two parties. And dont buy into the the GOP harping that Obama hates business, Bartlett cautions. The president, he says, has bent over backward to protect corporate profits.