Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 11:40 AM Jan 2016

Hillary's Campaign Is Sinking Fast based on Dollars Spent

Sanders has been steadily gaining while spending only 1/3 of what Hillary's campaign has.

To date, from OpenSecrets, Hillary's campaign has spent $44 million, while Sanders has spent $14 million. Furthermore, Sanders has nearly as much cash on hand as Hillary's campaign. Given the current momentum, Sanders is tracking to win Iowa, New Hampshire and now, a report comes out from politico, Nevada is a strong possibility, with key Clinton supporters switching sides to join Sanders:

But in recent days, Sanders has won over some of Clinton’s most stalwart supporters in the state. Erin Bilbray, a member of the Democratic National Committee from Nevada who was so loyal to Clinton in 2008 that she refused to support Obama at the convention, has endorsed the Vermont senator.
Bilbray said in October she was planning to support Clinton. But she changed her mind after a friend dragged her to an organizing meeting hosted by the Sanders campaign.


Hillary needs to shake her campaign up if she's going to stop the Bern... and it's really a bad time in the campaign to be doing this. Seems like Mark Penn may really be running things again... just like he tanked her campaign in 2008.

For details: Hillary's open secrets page: http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000019

Sander's open secrets page: http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/candidate.php?id=N00000528
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Blue_Adept

(6,399 posts)
1. Except she's spending her cash on the ground game
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 11:41 AM
Jan 2016

It's not like it's being burned up in caviar dinners for everyone - even if folks want to believe so.

She and her team learned a hell of a lot the last time around and they're not screwing around, as much as some want to view it that way.

 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
3. When you take out ground-game expenses (rent/payroll), she's still spent $30 million.
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 11:54 AM
Jan 2016

You might want to do a little research on her expenditures. She's spent over $20 million on advertising and polling.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
17. She's gonna need more than that
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 03:45 AM
Jan 2016

As the OP states, she's going the wrong way. No one watches TV and her ground game is a waste because people don't like where she stands,

Bernie tho, the more people get to know him, the more fired up they become.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
4. Clinton has a consistent lead in Iowa, the newest New Hampshire
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 12:00 PM
Jan 2016

Poll is a tie and one person in Nevada switching isn't enough to change the substantial lead she holds there.

 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
5. "Sanders has won over some of Clinton’s most stalwart supporters"
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 12:16 PM
Jan 2016

that's plural. Even though the article only discloses one big name, it does use the plural form, meaning there are many more.

Sanders is consistently gaining throughout his expenditures, while Clinton is not (at 3 times the cost).

brooklynite

(94,495 posts)
9. I'm on the Clinton Campaign's finance calls...
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 12:42 PM
Jan 2016

...if there was concern about cash on hand, I'd hear about it.

There isn't.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
10. He is not tracking to win Iowa
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 12:45 PM
Jan 2016

NH is a legit toss up.

And Clinton is bringing in a ton of money and actually using some of it. You know, on the campaign

And she is up by 20 in Nevada.

But other than that, I'm sure your post is fine.

 

MeNMyVolt

(1,095 posts)
11. Your numbers appear to be old.
Thu Jan 7, 2016, 12:53 PM
Jan 2016

Candidates totals for 2015 for raised, spent, and cash on hand are:

HRC - 112, 74, 38
SBS - 73, 45, 28

So SBS has spent 60% of what HRC has spent, not 1/3.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary's Campaign Is Sin...