Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 12:58 PM Jan 2016

Martin O'Malley narrowly qualifies for fourth debate

Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley will likely qualify for the next debate -- but just barely.

Criteria announced by NBC News on Friday for its Jan. 17 Democratic debate in Charleston requires qualifying candidates to have at least 5 percent support in the early nominating states of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina or nationally.

Based on the polls NBC is recognizing, O'Malley sits at exactly 5 percent in Iowa.

An NBC News official with knowledge of the criteria confirmed O'Malley, a two-term Maryland governor, currently qualifies. The official said NBC would likely round O'Malley's total up if subsequent polls lowered his average a few tenths of a percent.


http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/politics/blog/bal-omalley-narrowly-qualifies-for-fourth-debate-20160108-story.html


Turns out it's much ado about nothing.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

randys1

(16,286 posts)
1. Why have the criteria at all, are there other candidates who want in that this will
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 01:00 PM
Jan 2016

deny?

Otherwise why do something that might exclude MOM?

firebrand80

(2,760 posts)
3. Then what was the point in announcing the criteria?
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 01:01 PM
Jan 2016

NBC could have just invited the three candidates and left it at that.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
7. Depends on what someone means by nothing.
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 01:07 PM
Jan 2016

Arbitrary numbers to allow or disallow a candidate to get his or her message out doesn't seem like a little d democratic process.

Tanuki

(14,918 posts)
8. I'm glad he is being included, as all candidates should be heard. How else can people make
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 01:10 PM
Jan 2016

informed choices? But O'Malley needs some serious work on his ground game. Failing to get enough valid signatures to get on the Ohio primary ballot was a serious screw-up on somebody's part.

http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2015/12/martin_omalley_fails_to_make_o.html

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
12. Yes it was a huge mistake,which was surprising
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 01:16 PM
Jan 2016

because he's been working his ass off in the early states.

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
15. But yet Rocky de la Fuente got enough signatures
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 01:19 PM
Jan 2016

to appear on the Ohio ballot.

I would like to know why Rocky does not have a DU group?

Squinch

(50,944 posts)
17. Just want to say: that hide you got in the other thread was complete bullshit. You told the truth.
Fri Jan 8, 2016, 05:04 PM
Jan 2016

That's becoming hazardous around here. You should not have been hidden.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Martin O'Malley narrowly ...