Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So much for the media "ignoring" Sanders: (Original Post) George II Jan 2016 OP
It is the similar argument that the right uses when they say the MSM is libural. It flies in the still_one Jan 2016 #1
Isn't Sunday talk for political junkies? Lucky Luciano Jan 2016 #2
Spot on ! Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #7
Based on the above graph only 90-percent Jan 2016 #3
To put that in perspective HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #4
Not deceptive, it says exactly what it represents. George II Jan 2016 #5
With the implication that... HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #6
It should be noted that Hillary tends to be unavailable to these shows Tom Rinaldo Jan 2016 #8
FINALLY!! It's a good thing his supporters spoke up!! Douglas Carpenter Jan 2016 #9
But, there is a blackout and a petition must be signed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! leftofcool Jan 2016 #10

still_one

(92,136 posts)
1. It is the similar argument that the right uses when they say the MSM is libural. It flies in the
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 10:41 AM
Jan 2016

face of the facts


Lucky Luciano

(11,253 posts)
2. Isn't Sunday talk for political junkies?
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:57 AM
Jan 2016

The question of media bias is in regards to day to day news coverage.

90-percent

(6,829 posts)
3. Based on the above graph only
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:59 AM
Jan 2016

There were approximately 244 appearances by Republicans and 69 appearances by Democrats.

78% of the time it was a Republican appearance. 22% of the time it was a Democrat.

So, just what did you expect from our LIBERAL MEDIA?


-90% jimmy

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
4. To put that in perspective
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:03 PM
Jan 2016

Hillary Clinton isn't even included on that graph, yet no one would argue the fact that she receives more media coverage than Bernie. Deceptive graph is deceptive.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
6. With the implication that...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:06 PM
Jan 2016

...Bernie is somehow receiving tons of media coverage, which up to this week has not been true at all.

Tom Rinaldo

(22,912 posts)
8. It should be noted that Hillary tends to be unavailable to these shows
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:07 PM
Jan 2016

She is notoriously cautious about which live interviews she grants and when. If these talk shows didn't book Sanders they would essentially be openly partisan fronts for Republican talking points during the primary season - which they mostly are anyway. They can fairly safely ignore O'Malley (though they shouldn't) because he hasn't gotten much traction, but if they didn't book Bernie, who is willing to be interviewed by them, they couldn't claim to be covering the full race for President.

But when it comes time for talking heads to do what comes naturally to them among themselves, they have always talked about Hillary far more than they do about Bernie, and repeatedly talk about how various Republicans will run against her and rarely mention Bernie in that context

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So much for the media "ig...