2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumstill_one
(92,136 posts)face of the facts
Lucky Luciano
(11,253 posts)The question of media bias is in regards to day to day news coverage.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)90-percent
(6,829 posts)There were approximately 244 appearances by Republicans and 69 appearances by Democrats.
78% of the time it was a Republican appearance. 22% of the time it was a Democrat.
So, just what did you expect from our LIBERAL MEDIA?
-90% jimmy
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Hillary Clinton isn't even included on that graph, yet no one would argue the fact that she receives more media coverage than Bernie. Deceptive graph is deceptive.
George II
(67,782 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)...Bernie is somehow receiving tons of media coverage, which up to this week has not been true at all.
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)She is notoriously cautious about which live interviews she grants and when. If these talk shows didn't book Sanders they would essentially be openly partisan fronts for Republican talking points during the primary season - which they mostly are anyway. They can fairly safely ignore O'Malley (though they shouldn't) because he hasn't gotten much traction, but if they didn't book Bernie, who is willing to be interviewed by them, they couldn't claim to be covering the full race for President.
But when it comes time for talking heads to do what comes naturally to them among themselves, they have always talked about Hillary far more than they do about Bernie, and repeatedly talk about how various Republicans will run against her and rarely mention Bernie in that context