2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNBC IA: Clinton 48, Sanders 45
NH: Sanders 50, Clinton 46
Brand-new NBC/WSJ/Marist poll of IA (LVs) for the Dem race:
Clinton 48
Sanders 45
O'Malley 5
Brand-new NBC/WSJ/Marist poll of NH (LVs):
Sanders 50
Clinton 46
O'Malley 1
This is via Mark Murray's Twitter account
CommonSenseDemocrat
(377 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)And they say Steve Jobs was a master of "reality distortion."
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #3)
Name removed Message auto-removed
tecelote
(5,122 posts)Poor Hillary. She's losing ground. The margins are getting slimmer every day.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)It would be nice to win NH outright, but it's interesting to see what a difficult time Bernie is having... right there in his "own back yard". If he's having so much difficulty there, in an area that's exceedingly friendly to him, imagine how difficult it will be for him throughout the rest of the country. After all, NH certainly isn't very representative of this country, is it?
cali
(114,904 posts)synergie
(1,901 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)than Bernie, by far: 1992. 1996. 2008. 20015. Not rocket science, jacks.
synergie
(1,901 posts)not rocket science, but it is geography and fact based assessment of reality, but I see why you're having such trouble.
And, "jacks"? Is that name calling, poor literacy or some other fallacious attempt to pretend you didn't say something completely ridiculous?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)She has.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Does that bother you that she's campaigning there? Actually, I already know the answer, so never mind. (I'm glad she's not taking votes for granted. She's in it to win it!)
Go, Hillary!
cali
(114,904 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Taking no vote for granted! Working to win! Hillary will be the nominee!
Go Hillary!
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Could it be that those states which begin to pay attention first to the candidates realize that Sanders is a very strong choice for our nominee?
synergie
(1,901 posts)It's kind of sad how hard you cling to meaningless second counting while you miss basic facts. Ask anyone in NH or Vermont how well they know their local senators and reps, and who they pay attention to, then you might begin to understand how silly you sound.
Bernie should win NH, it would be kind of sad if he did not. That has kind of been expected for quite some time.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)New Hampshire isn't really his backyard. NH and Vermont are worlds apart in their attitudes and media markets.
http://boulter.com/nh/barnicle.html
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2007/11/vermont-and-new-hampshire-geographic-twins-cultural-aliens/
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)She had a 20 point lead in Iowa a month or two ago and now they're tied. The momentum is clearly in Bernie's favor.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)The 19+ lead was NBC/WSJ polling with their own methodology. This one is NBC/Marist, which uses a different set. They're not exactly comparable.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Last NBC/WSJ/Marist poll was in September:
In Iowa, Hillary moved from +5 to +3, which would be considered within the margin where it is impossible to see if an actual change has happened.
NH, however went from Sanders at +14 to +4. That is a ten point swing and would be considered significant.
Don't get me wrong, I don't like Iowa being that close, but this is not out of line with what they've reported before.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)The last NBC/WSJ/Marist poll I can find is on HuffPollster and RCP from 9/30 where the results in IA are reported as 47/36 and 33/28 respectively (the difference presumably due to Biden's inclusion).
Okay looking at that I can see what you're saying, but you have to remember that those polls included Biden and were taken before October when Hillary expanded her leads everywhere.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)I've never liked reallocating support by second choice; it is a messy proposition.
Now little ol' cynical me might say that NBC wanted both races in the MOE to claim how accurate they were if both states ended up close regardless of who won.
But that would never happen, right
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Response to firebrand80 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)When comeback kid Clinton unexpectedly took NH and went on to win the WH?
Response to ucrdem (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)That's news.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Last edited Sun Jan 10, 2016, 03:30 PM - Edit history (1)
For the taking!
Go Bernie!
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
You can feel the shift. People have had enough of the greed of the Oligarchs.
dinkytron
(568 posts)still warming to his message. He is still being discovered. The media blackout on him might have paid off in weird way. To the contrary, it feels like Hillary has peaked. I really don't see her drawing any more supporters than she already has. I also think this is the wrong year to be the "establishment" candidate.
ON EDIT --- If I am totally wrong, I will still vote for Hillary with pleasure. I love her, Bill and Chelsea. I just don't feel she's the one, this year.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)His advantage in NH may now be in double digits, and he may even have overtaken Clinton again in Iowa.
catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)the audio of the theme from "Jaws"???
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)While confident, momentum and just the reality of an early victory could be big.
PatrickforO
(14,570 posts)isn't showing in the polls. But, if his supporters show up AT the polls, he'll roll over Clinton. It won't even be close.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)for HRC!
artislife
(9,497 posts)innocent.
DemocraticWing
(1,290 posts)That might actually decide Iowa.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)My guess it goes to Sanders
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)Now watch how the networks will suddenly stop covering Trump so much.