2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHRC and her good friend Henry Kissinger
I am posting this because whenever this topic came up in the past, HRC defenders brushed it off as her simply being polite to a member of the political establishment. She wrote a fawning review of his book just to be nice, and we should in no way view praise of a war criminal as unseemly.
As I said in response, her relationship went beyond the "polite" to "kindred spirits". Henry Kissinger is the only man in this country with more blood on his hands than the likes of Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and George W.
http://www.salon.com/2016/01/12/emails_expose_close_ties_between_hillary_clinton_and_accused_war_criminal_henry_kissinger/
Emails expose close ties between Hillary Clinton and accused war criminal Henry Kissinger
Salon.com
I greatly admire the skill and aplomb with which you conduct our foreign policy, wrote Henry Kissinger in a 2012 letter to the Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton. The compliment was included as a handwritten postscript added to the printed letter.
The Feb. 7 letter, which was released in a batch of emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, is a request that she help declassify documents from Kissingers time as secretary of state, which he says constitute a unique record of a critical period in American foreign policy.
The late journalist Christopher Hitchens devoted an entire book to detailing the war crimes overseen by Kissinger, who infamously declared The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer.
In The Trial of Henry Kissinger, Hitchens argues the former secretary of state should be tried for war crimes, for crimes against humanity, and for offenses against common or customary or international law, including conspiracy to commit murder, kidnap and torture.
Hitchens described Kissinger as a master of depraved realpolitik with a callous indifference to human life and human rights, who was behind U.S.-backed atrocities in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, East Timor, Chile, Bangladesh, Cyprus, Kurdish Iraq, Iran, South Africa, Angola and more.
Yes, the article points out that John Kerry also has cordial relations with Kissinger, and I will say right now that I condemn the man wholeheartedly and have no further use for him. ANYONE who treats with Kissinger on such a level is condoning war crimes.
Yes, I know other Democrats, including the current administration had dealings with him, and shame on them. I can excuse Carter, since he inherited the shambles of the loss of Vietnam along with the chaos of the surrounding region and had to deal with this ghoul in cleaning up his mess. But once his crimes became documented, treating him as anything other than a pariah unforgivable.
randys1
(16,286 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)The noise is just too much, Somebody turn it off, or we will Bern it down!
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)How is pointing out facts "bashing"?
What points are in dispute?
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I can't understand how facts are bashing either, but to some they seem to be.
randys1
(16,286 posts)for their healthcare procedures, if your insistent bashing of Hillary results in President Cruz outlawing Women's healthcare?
Will that be enough of an answer for you?
Do you have any idea what the phrase "big picture" means?
Seriously... DO YOU?
You see the reason I dont BASH either candidate is I want ONE of them to win, but I dont really believe any longer that many of you feel the same way.
I think that many of you want one candidate and only one, to win. I think some of you hate Hillary so much, and hate her supporters so much, that she cant get your vote.
That is what I think.
I wonder if I, a Bernie supporter, will be allowed to say that.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)if for HRC to be the candidate, which will galvanize the right and they will dredge up every scandal, real and imagined and go to town.
I am tired of "dynastic politics" and "choosing the lesser of two evils" and presidential candidates who are bought and paid for.
If the U.S. voters are clueless enough to to elect Cruz then we will suffer the consequences we deserve.
If HRC didn't want to alienate voters over things like hugging (literally) a war criminal, she shouldn't have hugged a war criminal. It is all about her choices, and her choices have, on the average been very poor.
randys1
(16,286 posts)You said
1. Are you a Woman who can get pregnant?
2. Are you a person of color or Gay?
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Cambodian, Vietnamese, Cypriot, Black South African or some other person who has suffered due to Kissinger's atrocities?
The mass graves are home to millions of Hank's victims, which you seem to ignore.
Again, is it only American lives that matter to you?
If you take a look at the countries where gays, women and other minorities are still oppressed, you will note that a lot of them are legacies of Kissinger's handiwork .
randys1
(16,286 posts)the consequences of a GOP presidency as if it was nothing
The way you can do that is if you are likely not to be one of the victims
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)It bears directly on her judgment and who she takes advice from, and the fact that she doesn't see taking guidance and socializing with a war criminal as "wrong".
Explain to me the difference between Henry Kissinger's crimes and Dick Cheney's. Would you vote for her if she were praising Cheney?
I have already suffered through several conservative presidencies, and do not wish to suffer through another.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)and unlike many other arguments, this one usually peters out fast when I ask for them to specify which facts are incorrect.
The standard argument is always "Kissinger is a statesman, despite his crimes, and she is just being polite since that's what you have to do". Unfortunately, once I point out that her actions are "above and beyond" polite protocol (also, why would one be polite to an architect of mass murder?), the responses stop.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)How is pointing out her lending legitimacy to this war criminal anything but the historical fact?
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)you're bashing her.
Faux pas
(14,665 posts)kath
(10,565 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 12, 2016, 06:12 PM - Edit history (1)
Apparently is for HRC?
How is it "bashing" to criticize her for admiring such an evil sumbitch?
as Tom Lehrer famously said " Political satire became obsolete when Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel peace prize.".
randys1
(16,286 posts)I would be insulted if I respected your point of view, but that you could say that to me, solves that problem.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Henry Kissinger is one of the most despicable pretensions to claim to be a human being that ever lived. He's just awful!
Did I misunderstand your post???
randys1
(16,286 posts)not to understand, thus doubling down.
Disgraceful
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)to accuse someone of saying Kissinger is a hero.
randys1
(16,286 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Just not in the mood for jokes I guess.
I'm not always this dense. But there are moments . . . . .
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)I am asking whether you will vote for someone who considers him a close friend and adviser?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Glamrock
(11,795 posts)The very last verse:
"And I hope that you die
And your death'll come soon
I will follow your casket
In the pale afternoon
And I'll watch while you're lowered
Down to your deathbed
And I'll stand over your grave
'Til I'm sure that you're dead."
I always think of Darth Cheney when I hear this. Usually substitute "stand over" with "piss on"...but that's just me...
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)we will quit right after you present your defense of Hillary's friendship with Kissinger.
You are known by the company you keep.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)having Kissinger as a close friend from having Dick Cheney as a close friend. Would you vote for her if she were writing fawning reviews of Cheney's books and consulting with him on foreign policy?
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Bill and George W. Bush. Do I win?
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)That seems like a fitting tune, albeit one with different meanings for both sides of the debate.
delrem
(9,688 posts)My advice to you is to learn to live with it, if Hillary Clinton is elected: she admires and emulates Henry Kissinger.
Since you totally support her, stand with her against all opposition, you'll get a whole lot of what you really want.
But then, you must admire Henry Kissinger too. You can't deny that, and support Hillary Clinton as well. And you wouldn't be posting the stuff you post, attacking people who point out Hillary's extreme right-wing connections, who suggest that right-wingers like that are wrong, and dangerous, and have as much blood on their hands as the worst war criminals in human history. Characterizing that opposition as "Hillary bashing", as if it were all about Hillary Rodham Clinton and not the victims of the hell on earth that she promises to bring, like her mentor Henry Kissinger.
So calm down. Promote your politician. Don't let a bit of negativity get you so agitated.
randys1
(16,286 posts)not surprised.
Because I am not an alerter, they will be allowed to stand.
Your attack of me shows me the type of person we are dealing with.
delrem
(9,688 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)if this shit continues
delrem
(9,688 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)That's a nice smile you have for the world killer, Senator Clinton.
TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)hootinholler
(26,449 posts)That screams GET A ROOM YOU TWO!
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)that I can't ever "un-see."
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)That photo is genuinely creepy, in a "what the hell is with THAT?" kind of way.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)Her campaign manager own a lobbying form whose clients include military weapons manufacturers and Saudi Arabia, BP Oil, General Dynamics, Walmart, and Bank of America.
To name a few.
Oh and after this became known, Iraq hired them:
http://www.aljazeera.com/humanrights/2013/03/201331883513244683.html
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)you'll certainly see no diaries about it....
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)when you know who is stroking the checks, everything is much easier to figure out. it's like having the secret formula.
of course there's no diaries about THAT!
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)but then again there's also no diaries - well very few - mostly mine - about what the US military is up to in Yemen... I mention that because I think there's a hell of a lot of wilful ignorance in political circles... nature of the beast I guess...
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)on it? Thanks.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)I just did a big one a day or so ago!
But basically they're helping SA bomb Yemeni civilians and enforcing a naval blockade which is staving 2 million children. And have been for months... Rights groups are warning the US could be held responsible for warm crimes.
On the plus side they're helping al Qaeda and ISIS. No really.
This was after years of attempted ethnic cleansing in northern Yemen - cities endlessly bombed with us bombs - led to an uprising.
So yeah. Bombing cities. Collective punishment. Mass starvation.
Oh and the US government has been blocking investigation of this in the UN.
And during this time the US has sold SA billions and billions more Bomba and weapons.
EDIT: Here's a link http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027518453
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)As well.
Search for a post called something like: Saudi Arabia vs Iran
Or Saudi Arabia vs Yemen.
There's an amazing video in it that clearly explains the situation on the ground.
Also if you Google it there's plenty of non-American coverage of it.
Anyway, eyes peeled and spread the word if so inclined.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Never hurts to remind people what side of the aisle she use to be on. Who hugs Henry Kissinger?
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
oasis
(49,376 posts)Oooookay.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Do you think Hitchens has libeled and slandered Kissinger? How specifically is Kissinger different from say, Dick Cheney?
oasis
(49,376 posts)several times in person. He was always rude an obnoxious.
As for Kissinger, I don't care for him at all. Hillary has met countless office holders and diplomats, she was considered for Secretay of State because of her unique qualities.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Do you dispute Hitchens facts? If so, which ones?
Your opinion that he is a "hypocrite and a boozer" is not germane to the question.
Yes, HRC has met many office holders and diplomats, but how many of them:
1) Are unindicted war criminals?
2) Have gotten fawning book reviews from HRC?
3) Are referred to as a "friend" and "adviser" whose help is sought?
George II
(67,782 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)has been maligned and probably isn't a war criminal I will certainly give it a look. And if I am proven wrong I will certainly apologize publicly and give Henry a hug myself. Until then, why is it okay for her to call someone like that a "friend and adviser" and why would I vote for them? Why would you?
George II
(67,782 posts)And he was Secretary of State, like her. She didn't say she TOOK his advice, did she?
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)fawning book reviews:
"Kissinger is a friend, and I relied on his counsel when I served as secretary of state. He checked in with me regularly, sharing astute observations about foreign leaders and sending me written reports on his travels."
She also said that Kissingers foreign policy analysis and approach largely fits with the broad strategy behind the Obama administrations effort.
Really?
Shall we briefly review a few of Kissinger's crimes?
1) He sabotaged the Vietnamese peace talks in in 1968 in order to help Nixon get elected.
2) He was the mastermind of the secret bombing campaign that killed tens of thousands in Cambodia which helped destabilize the government allowing Pol Pot to take over. That led to MILLIONS dead.
3) He aided Pakistan in its brutal suppression of Bangladesh, leading to hundreds of thousands of dead.
4) He helped overthrow the democratically elected government of Chile, leading to the murderous regime of Pinochet. He was also up to his eyeballs in Operation Condor
The man has the blood of millions of innocent people on his hands. You do NOT socialize or treat with such a person. The only difference between Kissinger and Cheney is the scale of their crimes, and in this Cheney is second string.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Duppers
(28,118 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)Thanks for the thread, Kelvin Mace.