Red Pill Dudes: Marriage is worse than rape, but the feminist attack on marriage is even worser

[ismnotwasm]

So the uber-manly woman-hating woman-chasing alpha dogs over in the Red Pill subreddit are discussing the declining marriage rate. Which is a GOOD thing. Because marriage is for BETAs and FRUMPY WOMEN! It’s worse than RAPE!

Huh. If any of these Red Pill dudes were to get married I’m pretty sure it would be be a completely, you know, consensual act on their part. Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t rape a, you know, nonconsensual thing? (Reading the Red Pill subreddit, it’s sometimes hard to remember.)

At this point a fellow calling himself TheZimmerMan throws in his two cents on the subject. Like his fellow Red Pill alpha dudes, he’s no fan of marriage. But then he remembers that feminists are supposedly plotting to take down western civilization by destroying marriage. And feminists are bad, right? And so his brain sort of explodes, producing this wondrous bit of red pill word salad, sprinkled liberally with racism as well as misogyny:

http://manboobz.com/2013/08/14/red-pill-dudes-marriage-is-worse-than-rape-but-the-feminist-attack-on-marriage-is-even-worse-than-that/

[tblue37]

1. "DISSOLVATION"!!! He is worried about the

"DISSOLVATION" of the traditional family, where the man is the boss, with all the respect and benefits he has a right to!

He is at Sarah Palin's level of linguistic mastery.

[Nay]

4. True, but instead of your "respect and benefits" let's call it "deference and servants." Then

I'll go along with ya!

Respect is a two-way street, as are benefits. Those red pillers want all the goodies flowing toward them, without having to necessarily show respect or bestow benefits on anyone else in the family. Most of these MRAers want others to show them deference and provide services on demand, all due to him because of his obvious superiority, of course.....

[tblue37]

8. "Respect and benefits" is HIS phrase. The article that

quotes his post explains that what he really means is that he doesn't get to "f**k" the woman and "boss her around." (I agree with that reading of his point.)

[Arcanetrance]

2. Why am I not surprised the guy goes by The Zimmerman

[ismnotwasm]

5. Ew

You're right

[redqueen]

3. lol, he always makes mra bullshit amusing :)

This was the part that jumped out at me too:

I also like the complaint about how the “actual working man” pays for all these evil welfare moms while “being denied traditional provider respect and benefits.”

In misogynist-speak, that’s code for “how come we have to pay money for welfare when we don’t even get to fuck the welfare moms and boss them around?”

[Nay]

6. Ha! We posted almost the exact same point at the same time!

It's so transparent what these guys are about. They truly should be ashamed of themselves. I'm HAPPY when they say they aren't going to marry -- that's a GOOD thing! They should buy all their damn services on the open market (hookers, prepared food, housekeeper), be happy, and shut the fuck up. It would save everyone a bunch of aggravation.

[redqueen]

7. I think they should stay far, far away from women. All women. And girls.

[seabeyond]

9. buying a woman to use reinforces his perception of women.

what is really ironically funny about these men is they spew all this garbage and cry into their beers why there is no woman that loves them.

[Nay]

10. Hi, sea! Glad to see you. Yes, that was part of my point....his emphasis is on what his

maleness should buy him in the form of respect and services, not what he and a woman can have in a sharing relationship, so why doesn't he just go out and buy what he wants?

What they really want is a slave who does everything he wants, but pretends she has no wants or desires except to please him. Well, good luck with that, fella!