History of Feminism
Related: About this forumThe Creepiness Question
...
Theres a poisonous double standard in our society which says that its reverse-sexist and wrong for women to feel threatened by creepy-awkward male behaviour because our fear implies that we hold the negative, stereotypical view that All Men Are Predators, but that if were raped or sexually assaulted by any man with whom weve had prior social interaction and particularly if hes expressed some sexual or romantic interest in us during that time its reasonable for observers to ask what precautions we took to prevent the assault from happening, or to suggest that we maybe led the guy on by not stating our feelings plainly. The result is a situation where women are punished if we reject, avoid or identify creepy men, and then told its our fault if were assaulted by someone we plainly ought to have rejected, avoided, identified.
...
Ive written before about my brush with sexual assault at university; two incidents which, despite leaving me unscathed, nonetheless serve as reinforcement for the idea that persistence in matters of sex and romance, even once the girl has said no, are considered a male prerogative in our culture. Indeed, the idea of winning the girl of overcoming female objections or resistance through repeated and frequently escalating efforts is central to most of our modern romantic narratives. (Female persistence, by contrast, is viewed as pathetic.) And the more I think about instances of creepiness, harassment and stalking that culminate in either the threat or actuality of sexual assault, the more Im convinced that a massive part of the problem is this socially sanctioned idea that men are fundamentally entitled to persist. Because if men are meant to persist, then women who say no must only be rejecting the attempt, not the man himself, so that every separate attempt becomes one of a potentially infinite number of keys which might just fit the lock of the womans approval. Shes not the one whos allowed to say no, not really; she should be silent and passive as a locked door, waiting patiently while the man runs through however many keys he can be bothered trying. And if he gets sick of this lengthy process and just breaks in? Well, frustration under those circumstances is only natural. Either the door shouldnt have been there to impede him, or it shouldnt have been locked.
We tell children and particularly young girls to beware of creepy adult behaviour; to identify, report and avoid it. But at some point during adolescence, the message becomes reversed: if youre old enough to consent, the logic seems to go, then suddenly youre old enough that being too scared to say no, or having your no ignored, is your fault rather than your assailants. When adults behave creepily towards children, our first priority is to ascertain whether a threat is posed, because wed rather call them out for their inappropriateness than risk a genuine threat being written off as harmless, particularly in instances where the child is visibly upset. Certainly, if a child ever came to you and said they didnt feel safe or comfortable around a particular adult, youd treat it as a very serious matter. And yet we dont extend the same logic to people who behave creepily towards other adults partly and very reasonably, it must be said, because adults are better able to defend themselves than children, and because, on the sexual side of things, children literally cannot consent to anything, whereas one adult propositioning another is not morally repugnant in and of itself, regardless of how creepily they choose to go about it.
But surely the threat of sexual assault is still legitimate and grave enough that its better to call someone out for being inappropriate and creepy than to risk a genuine threat being written off as harmless, particularly when the subject of their behaviour is visibly upset? Surely if a friend or colleague comes to you and says they dont feel safe or comfortable around a particular person, this too is a serious matter? Because even if that person has the best of intentions, poses no threat and doesnt mean to be creepy, the fact remains that they are still making someone uncomfortable, and thats definitely worth addressing. As the excellent John Scalzi points out, you dont get to define someone elses comfort level with you: sure, it might suck that someone thinks youre being creepy, but your hurt feelings at that verdict are ultimately less important than whether or not the other person feels safe. If you persist in bothering someone after theyve made it clear they dont like you, or in treating them in a manner to which they object simply because you, personally, see nothing wrong with it, then you are being an asshat: you are saying that their actual fear and discomfort are less important that your right to behave in a way that makes them afraid and discomforted, and if thats the case, then why the hell shouldnt they call you out?
...
http://fozmeadows.wordpress.com/2012/08/27/the-creepiness-question/
Squinch
(50,911 posts)who will hold that opinion: "that its reverse-sexist and wrong for women to feel threatened by creepy-awkward male behavior because our fear implies that we hold the negative, stereotypical view that All Men Are Predators."
Yes, those morons who think this way exist. But those are people who dislike women anyway. They may not think they do, but do we really have any doubts at all? No, we don't. They dislike women.
We should not be giving their opinion the time of day.
We know what happens. We know that when we get that vibe, we should listen to it. It doesn't guarantee any safety, because often horrible things happen to women when there was no vibe to warn us. But if there is a vibe, I'm going to listen to it. If it gives us a little edge of safety that we otherwise wouldn't have, we would be idiots not to heed the vibe.
So if there is someone out there saying that they are hurt and oppressed by the fact that women do what little we can do to stay a little safer, I say that someone can drop dead. That is someone who is trying to make me accept their agenda rather than accepting what my own eyes see and my own gut tells me. That's someone who doesn't give a rat's ass about me, so I don't need to give a rat's ass about them.
People who hold that opinion are just not worth my time. I think it is a mistake to give their position any credence or legitimacy.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and avoid rape by learning the "rules" on the one hand and then they cried and whined about discrimination and the unfairness when we followed the rules. the contradictions in their arguments happening at the same time on different threads was a riot, i tell you.
Squinch
(50,911 posts)and we cross the street so as not to be in arm's reach of an unknown man, we are discriminating against them personally.
Sorry, it's what I do. And if the sensitive ones need to rage, I say rage on. It just lets us know we are justified in thinking they are idiots.
Edited to say, here's another thing: One time I was walking on an empty street late at night, in the iffy neighborhood where my family had a business. I was distracted, and didn't stay out of arm's reach of a man who I didn't recognize.
The guy turned out to be a former employee of the family business who I hadn't seen in a long time, and I didn't recognize him because his hair had gotten much longer.
He yelled at me for letting him get close enough to grab me before I recognized him as someone I knew. This was a guy who cared about my well being. That's how guys who care about your well being want you to act. The other ones would prefer if you take risks so they can make a point. They can drop dead.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)lol. there is that.
ChazII
(6,202 posts)common sense in this matter. I have been lucky in that several male friends told me the same as yours. These males care about our well being more than they care about being right.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Too many women bother engaging with those misogynists who prioritize men's feelings over women's safety.
These pieces are intended, IMO, to convince those women who might be swayed to waste time and energy trying to soothe such men's feelings that doing so is not worth the effort.
.
ismnotwasm
(41,965 posts)Can't act like Passive-aggressive pervy assholes without being called on it? Aww. Too bad.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)If this occurs (and it occurs all the time), then the appropriate thing to do is to not take the rejection personally and to move on with your life.
The least appropriate thing to do, however, is to act creepy toward or stalk the person whom you are infatuated with. Stalkers are quite scary, perhaps especially when it's men stalking women, considering what we know (or should know) about physical as well as social power imbalances between men and women.
I would venture to guess, as well, that men stalk women much more so than women stalk men, or men stalk men, or women stalk women.
So yeah...don't want to be labeled a 'creep"? Change your behavior. Try not to be a creep-better yet, just don't be a creep. Examine your motives. And for heaven's sake, don't bitch and moan about the "Creeper" label.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Again, it's simply a matter of giving a shit what another person wants or doesn't want. Those who don't give a shit are self-centered jerkoffs at best and sexual predators at worst.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)that is part and parcel of this patriarchy.
Continually talking about these kinds of things is how we dismantle the patriarchy. As more and more people become conscious of what exactly is being manifested in these situations, it stops being dismissed as a case of 'oh well that's just one individual guy being a jerk' and it becomes visible as the societal problem it is - a problem we can solve.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)is hands down this Q+A fom Capt awkward:
http://captainawkward.com/2012/08/07/322-323-my-friend-group-has-a-case-of-the-creepy-dude-how-do-we-clear-that-up/
The comments are kind of mind blowing, sad to say- way too many women pressured into behaving as if their fears for safety are less important than happiness of the creeper himself. Great scripts, as always,from CA and links to other blogs exploring this topic too, including some directed at men.
pitbullgirl1965
(564 posts)This is exactly why I'm not Nice Girl. My job isn't to coddle your delicate feelings when I tell you to taking your f**king hand off my leg.
Not all of these creepers are going to change, nor do they WANT to change.
Why should they? They're supported by society, their fellow dude bros, and the silence of decent men who don't call them out. They benefit from it.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)(in this case- a post about how young is too young to lust after girls) adds to the creepiness. ANd he wanted to talk about some weird post saying all men should be castrated. Seriously- as if that was something that actually happens or is largely condoned. Any excuse not to acknowledge the creepy shit.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)Sweet, gentle, and "nice".
FUCK. THAT.
I am nice or not nice depending on the situation. I am not nice to random self-important males just because they have a penis and I don't. Possession of a penis does not impress me in the least. So fucking what. You gotta earn my "nice", motherfuckers.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)bah hahaha
come, let me give you a hug, lol.
i hear ya, woman.
Squinch
(50,911 posts)Plus, it's a riot.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)yes, I agree and gender does not really enter into it (for me). Shouldn't all humans be kind to one another regardless the gender?
I am not disagreeing with anyone.
I am just saying that I think it is OK to be a nice PERSON. We all, as a people, should be kinder to each other.
I am not disagreeing with what you are saying, really.
I just am trying to figure it out for myself is all.