Angry Men: Attack of the 50-Foot Feminist Agenda

[redqueen]

...

Now, men’s rights groups are pushing another bill that would change court guidelines in custody proceedings, moving from the standard of doing what is in the best interest of the child to making shared custody the default. That sounds reasonable enough—good parents should certainly be able to play a meaningful role in their children’s lives after a divorce—but the proposed law has no provision for judges to determine whether one of the parents was violent in the relationship, which is a pretty glaring hole. And studies show that shared custody is one way that emotionally abusive spouses often seek to extend their control after a marital breakup.

In spite of that, men’s groups have convinced more than a quarter of Massachusetts House members to cosponsor the bill. In the face of that pressure, Governor Patrick in July appointed 18 people to the Working Group on Child-Centered Family Laws, which is examining current regulations and trying to come up with a consensus on future guidelines. Men’s rights groups, including the Fatherhood Coalition and Fathers and Families, managed to get three of their members in the group, but there are no representatives from mothers’ groups. (One member comes from a domestic violence organization, however, and another from the Women’s Bar Association.)

“They’re organized,” says a Beacon Hill insider. “They’re vocal, they can be vociferous…and they’ve capitalized on the success they had with the reform alimony laws.”

And men’s groups are having successes like this all over the country. Rita Smith of the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence told the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Report that such groups have “taken over the courts,” and that they have “been able to get custody evaluators, mediators, guardians ad litem, and child protective service workers to believe that women and children lie about abuse.”
...

http://www.bostonmagazine.com/2012/08/angry-men-feminist-agenda/2/

Oops.

Another refresher on one of the reasons MRAs are dangerous, now improved with actual content.

[seabeyond]

1. and the rampant lite or no sentencing with rape of our children, even when rapists admits....

interesting.

[xulamaude]

2. 50/50 sounds good but,

you know, they probably didn't do 50/50 while they were actually married so who would think they truly want that kind of custody after the divorce?

Extension of control? That's the reality.

[seabeyond]

3. absolutely. the reason today, so many fathers are not primary caretakers is they have NO

interest in being primary caretakers. if they do want to be the primary caretaker, most all courts, and certainly the ones in texas, have addressed the gender imbalance issue and that is a place of the old.

[xulamaude]

4. Right and then the stat in RQs other post

about how some 85 per cent of custody issues are handled privately just goes to show that most people are probably fine with the same percentage they probably had during the marriage.

Although weekend dads are most likely spending more time with their kids than they did before... well that is if they don't have their girlfriend/new wife taking care of them.

[ismnotwasm]

5. Dads that spend more time with their kids

Should be thanking feminists. MRA's didn't do that. We did.

[xulamaude]

6. That is absolutely true. nt