Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 10:51 PM Feb 2014

On the one hand, I generally agree that a civil, "reasonable" approach is probably best...

On the other hand, I don't think anyone has a right to demand civility from a person who may have a good reason for being upset. Less so if the person doing the demanding has no direct experience with the injustice(s) alluded to.

And I guess this is as close to a "New Year's message" as you're gonna get from me...

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On the one hand, I generally agree that a civil, "reasonable" approach is probably best... (Original Post) nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 OP
May I ask what prompted this? BainsBane Feb 2014 #1
Nothing in particular. Just general thoughts that have been floating around my head lately. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #2
I used it myself today BainsBane Feb 2014 #3
Well if, by all indications, 95% or more of accusers are telling the truth, I don't find that nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #4
I agree. cinnabonbon Feb 2014 #5
I'm usually civil ismnotwasm Feb 2014 #6
+10000000000 redqueen Feb 2014 #7
Yeah, I've never thought of DU as being on the cutting edge of anything, particularly. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #8

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
2. Nothing in particular. Just general thoughts that have been floating around my head lately.
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 12:46 AM
Feb 2014

I know it's sort of "DUH!" for you guys, but the "tone argument" seems to keep popping up in one form or another, and it does bother me a little, if only as a distraction from more important issues.

BainsBane

(53,012 posts)
3. I used it myself today
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 12:49 AM
Feb 2014

Against someone calling people who always believe rape victims "idiots." I enjoy turning their arguments against them.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
4. Well if, by all indications, 95% or more of accusers are telling the truth, I don't find that
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 03:34 AM
Feb 2014

"idiotic" at all. Besides, believing the victim's story is usually the default for other crimes...

ismnotwasm

(41,965 posts)
6. I'm usually civil
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 06:46 AM
Feb 2014

If I feel like a snark exchange-- very rare-- I can do that too. Letting people set the tone of the discussion or argument lets me know if it's worth discussing with a particular person. You'll notice I get into very few exchanges.

The "tone"argument/complaint is used by people who have misunderstood intent, don't understand the argument, or possibly have run into vehement disagreement over a topic OR had their ass handed to them at some point.

That being said, I see more often a tendency towards using sarcasm and baiting depending on topics instead of argument or discussion when it comes to discussing topics with feminists. Kind of a knee jerk defensive reaction. I no longer worry to much about it here at DU, there are exciting things happening in the world for women despite setbacks and atrocities. Feminism had, and has a huge part in paying it forward. DU is kinda falling behind in certain areas regarding genders, probably because of the MRA infestation.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
8. Yeah, I've never thought of DU as being on the cutting edge of anything, particularly.
Wed Feb 5, 2014, 09:40 PM
Feb 2014

Generally left-leaning, yes, but only "radical" in comparison to how knee-jerk right-wing so much of this country has become.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»On the one hand, I genera...