Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 06:28 PM Apr 2014

If He's Sexually Aggressive In Bars, It's Not Because He's Drunk

...

The researchers hired and trained 140 young adults to go into bars in the Toronto area and note every incident of aggression they saw. They found that 25 percent of all incidents involved sexual aggression. And 90 percent of the victims of sexual aggression were women being harassed by men.

Almost all of the aggression was physical, with about two-thirds of the aggressors physically touching women without consent. About 17 percent threatened contact. And 9 percent verbally harassed their targets.

...

The researchers also wanted to look into whether unwanted sexual advances were intentional or just a matter of misperception. This study points to the former, Graham says.

...

The fact that men were more likely to take advantage of intoxicated women shows that most of these incidents aren't well-intentioned, Graham says.

...

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/03/03/285307535/mens-drinking-isnt-the-driver-of-sexual-aggression-in-bars?utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=npr&utm_campaign=nprnews&utm_content=03032014


27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If He's Sexually Aggressive In Bars, It's Not Because He's Drunk (Original Post) redqueen Apr 2014 OP
This study is Ve-e-e-ry interesting intaglio Apr 2014 #1
It's sad that so many deny this reality. redqueen Apr 2014 #11
women knew this long ago. BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2014 #2
Yep, we have known for ages. redqueen Apr 2014 #12
Are we surprised? ismnotwasm Apr 2014 #3
Not just no but fuuuuuuuuuuuuuck no. redqueen Apr 2014 #13
That's awesome ismnotwasm Apr 2014 #19
No kidding. Control-Z Apr 2014 #4
Yet, some on this forum chervilant Apr 2014 #5
Let's call them by their right name - KitSileya Apr 2014 #6
We should start a counter-movement: chervilant Apr 2014 #7
"Don't be THAT guy!" seabeyond Apr 2014 #15
It started with a "don't be that guy" campaign ismnotwasm Apr 2014 #20
PS chervilant Apr 2014 #8
Yes, he should go on the list too. KitSileya Apr 2014 #9
Totally agree. chervilant Apr 2014 #10
This needs repeating: Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2014 #27
dsk, assange. (whether you applaud the man or not, still needs to face court). nt seabeyond Apr 2014 #16
Yes, and the US, Sweden and the UK need to state for the record that they will not extradite him. KitSileya Apr 2014 #17
because i have not gotten into the trenches on this i cannot state fact. i believe u.s. cannot seabeyond Apr 2014 #18
Indeed n/t chervilant Apr 2014 #25
Yep but every time the issue of rape comes up, you'll see them line up redqueen Apr 2014 #14
I was just explaining this thread to my husband ismnotwasm Apr 2014 #21
Because they're lazy assholes who can't be bothered to go find women who *want* to fuck them? redqueen Apr 2014 #22
Or they just think fucking women is their privilege ismnotwasm Apr 2014 #23
This: CrispyQ Apr 2014 #24
Filed under "No shit, Sherlock". MadrasT Apr 2014 #26

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
2. women knew this long ago.
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 10:24 PM
Apr 2014

Nice to see actual research, though.


Interesting note at the end there, regarding intentionality. Again, not a surprise to those of us who have been trying to be heard on the subject.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
12. Yep, we have known for ages.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 09:57 AM
Apr 2014

But yes it's nice to finally be able to get through to those who keep trying to pretend otherwise. (But he's drunk tooooooo! She's as much at fault as he is! )

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
13. Not just no but fuuuuuuuuuuuuuck no.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 10:02 AM
Apr 2014

Predators.

Hey did you see this on tumblr yet?

fistfulofweasley:

i think the thing people don’t realize with that bullshit “well not all guys are dangerous, you should give them a chance” or what the fuck ever is like

if i had a plate of cookies and i was like yeah, a few of them have laxatives in them and one’s got cyanide in there, BUT THEY’RE NOT ALL LIKE THAT

you’re probably not gonna take a fucking cookie


KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
6. Let's call them by their right name -
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:41 AM
Apr 2014

rape enablers, sexual harassment apologists, misogynists.

Anyone who cry, "but what about men who don't have social skills, you're making it impossible for them to get laid if you reject the right of men to talk to women anywhere, anytime, about anything, regardless of her stated wishes or clear body language" are ok with breaking women's boundaries, and what is rape and sexual harassment but a refusal to acknowledge that women have the right to set their own boundaries?

For example, anyone who defends the jerk who hit on Rebecca Watson in that elevator is a sexual harassment apologist. There are several here on DU. Jameis Winton/Roman Polanski/MikeTyson defenders? Rape enablers.

ismnotwasm

(41,975 posts)
20. It started with a "don't be that guy" campaign
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 12:27 PM
Apr 2014

Which the hate-groups MRA's appropriated and twisted into misogyny.

Oh, from here on out I will use the qualifier "hate-group" when referring to MRA's




http://www.theviolencestopshere.ca/dbtg.php

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
9. Yes, he should go on the list too.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 09:03 AM
Apr 2014

Anyone who defends a child molester, and anyone who is more concerned about the minuscule number of false accusations than the horrendous number of actual victims of harassment, molestation, and rape, should be banned from DU.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
10. Totally agree.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 09:10 AM
Apr 2014

I have a WHOLE list of misogynists and sexists whose vile blatherings I no longer have to tolerate.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
27. This needs repeating:
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 11:10 AM
Apr 2014
Anyone who defends a child molester, and anyone who is more concerned about the minuscule number of false accusations than the horrendous number of actual victims of harassment, molestation, and rape, should be banned from DU.

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
17. Yes, and the US, Sweden and the UK need to state for the record that they will not extradite him.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 10:52 AM
Apr 2014

Take away his cover for not facing trial - as long as they do not do that, they are enabling rape culture.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
18. because i have not gotten into the trenches on this i cannot state fact. i believe u.s. cannot
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 10:55 AM
Apr 2014

state what you suggest. for legal reasons, or because ??? and since it has been stated so many times, if people do not hold onto the legal conversation, yet insist it be done, when it cannot be done (not suggesting you cause i do not know what you know), then that is a part also.

i really do not remember exactly what it is. i know it is a game though, whatever it be to feed an egomaniac. someone else may have the answer.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
14. Yep but every time the issue of rape comes up, you'll see them line up
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 10:05 AM
Apr 2014

to chime in about how 'but how drunk is drunk? how do we know he wasn't drunk too? it's sooooooo hard to know! it's a very confusing situation! we shouldn't really call it "rape" because who knows what really happened?'

ismnotwasm

(41,975 posts)
21. I was just explaining this thread to my husband
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 01:24 PM
Apr 2014

When he was young he was a hard partier, and so were all his friends, female and male. I love to hear him say "those assholes are full of shit" --at the same time--since that behavior is alien to him personally, she gets this funny look on his face-- a mixture of disgust and confusion, "why would anybody DO that?"

ismnotwasm

(41,975 posts)
23. Or they just think fucking women is their privilege
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 01:49 PM
Apr 2014

"I'm going get 'lucky' tonight" -- ever see "Death Proof" by Tarantino? It's a serial killer movie, but he tosses in dialogue with two minor characters discussing the precise method they're going to try women they're drinking with drunk and them laid.

Tarantino is no feminist, but as a director he does toss little tidbits of common behavior in his movies.

CrispyQ

(36,457 posts)
24. This:
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 03:33 PM
Apr 2014
The fact that men were more likely to take advantage of intoxicated women shows that most of these incidents aren't well-intentioned, Graham says.


Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»If He's Sexually Aggressi...