Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
Thu May 1, 2014, 12:31 PM May 2014

Just sat on a jury. Juror 4 is a piece of work.

On Thu May 1, 2014, 11:47 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Maybe I used the wrong words. "I have a discussion with my wife about this topic.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4894362

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

So sick of this guy bashing nationalities. Everyday he's either trashing Americans or the Chinese. Bigotry is fucking bigotry and it makes DU suck.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu May 1, 2014, 12:03 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: DU needs two new forums.
She-Ra man hating forum no boys allowed!


Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A fine whine ... What makes DU suck is people stifling discussion by taking offense so easily. How can one compare cultures without any criticism?
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: nanjing to seoul said/wrote nothing that can be construed covertly or overtly as bigotry. I don't understand the reason for this alert. Overly sensitive in my estimation.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just sat on a jury. Juror 4 is a piece of work. (Original Post) NuclearDem May 2014 OP
That juror is proof postiive of the OP's point. BainsBane May 2014 #1
In my opinion Juror #4 in this instance is a troll and does not belong on DU. = Tuesday Afternoon May 2014 #2
ya. lol. ;) . nt seabeyond May 2014 #3
#6 is also clueless as to how pervasive is our culture even in the language. Tuesday Afternoon May 2014 #4
Alert on the jury? JoeyT May 2014 #5
You can alert on juries, right? gollygee May 2014 #6
SHE RA who must be obeyed! ismnotwasm May 2014 #7
I still haven't performed my ritual castration for the Goddess yet! NuclearDem May 2014 #10
LOL ismnotwasm May 2014 #11
The point made by the alerter isn't even related to sexism. Sheldon Cooper May 2014 #8
I guess mansplaining is OK on here mwrguy May 2014 #9

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
2. In my opinion Juror #4 in this instance is a troll and does not belong on DU. =
Thu May 1, 2014, 12:58 PM
May 2014

Boys are most definitely allowed. Skinner said we were to educate the boys. I see men on here all the time trying to help the boys grow into respectable, decent contributing members of society.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
4. #6 is also clueless as to how pervasive is our culture even in the language.
Thu May 1, 2014, 01:03 PM
May 2014

It was a "Freudian Slip" of the tongue by NtS, I am sure. It was a good catch, not sure it should have been alerted but, am Glad that it was because it exposed Juror#4 whomever they may be.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
5. Alert on the jury?
Thu May 1, 2014, 01:05 PM
May 2014

I think that's a thing. Even if the misogyny wasn't offensive, which it is, the innumeracy would be.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
8. The point made by the alerter isn't even related to sexism.
Thu May 1, 2014, 02:24 PM
May 2014

It's about bigotry toward Americans and Chinese. So, juror #4 can't correctly read an alert. Perhaps their juror privileges should be revoked?

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Just sat on a jury. Juror...