Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(41,971 posts)
Fri May 2, 2014, 12:03 PM May 2014

Study Finds That Women Aren’t Run By Their Periods. Scientists Everywhere Confused.

I wish someone would pay me a bunch of money for these studies. The article is kind of interesting, although heteronormative and focused on male partner preference of course. (Sigh)


What do women want? Over the past two decades, scientists have endeavored to answer this question by bringing women into their labs, asking about their sexual preferences, and then monitoring their menstrual cycles to try to extract clues from the ebb and flow of hormones in their mysterious female bodies. In recent years, these researchers have told us that the status of our monthly cycle on Election Day can influence our decision to favor Mitt Romney’s chiseled individualism or Barack Obama’s maternal healthcare policies; that our periods determine whether we feel like nesting with our partners tonight or heading out to proposition a stranger; and that our cycle urges us to swing with Tarzan at our most fertile and cuddle up with Clay Aiken when that month’s egg is out of the picture. Last month, psychologists at the University of Southern California published a meta-analysis of 58 research experiments that tested whether a woman’s preferences for masculinity, dominance, symmetry, health, kindness, and testosterone levels in her male romantic partners actually fluctuate across her menstrual cycle. The answer: They do not.

The analysis, published in the appropriately-titled journal Emotion Review, looked at studies that used a variety of sociological tools to examine women’s preferences for a host of masculine cues, such as a man’s gait, body hair, chin length, facial symmetry, or social interactivity, all through the prism of their menstrual cycles. They looked at studies that were focused on testing women’s preferences in short term relationships (like one-night stands) and long-term commitments (like marriages), and at studies that didn’t specify a relationship type at all. They included experiments that charted a woman’s menstrual cycle and fertility using hormonal tests and self-reports, ones that included women on hormonal contraception, and those that did not. All in all, they found that both fertile and non-fertile women preferred men who were more masculine, dominant, symmetric, and healthy; that those preferences remained relatively constant across their menstrual cycles; and that they applied to women’s feelings about both short-term and long-term relationships. Meanwhile, women who were at the non-fertile stage of their cycles—where they experience similar hormones to pregnant women—didn’t suddenly prefer kinder, gentler men.


http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/05/02/menstrual_studies_debunked_women_do_not_make_mating_decisions_based_on_their.html

What do women want is the wrong question. What do people want is the correct one.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study Finds That Women Aren’t Run By Their Periods. Scientists Everywhere Confused. (Original Post) ismnotwasm May 2014 OP
I thought this was going to be satire. Tuesday Afternoon May 2014 #1
I did too. ellenrr May 2014 #2
thank god ... Tuesday Afternoon May 2014 #6
Right? ismnotwasm May 2014 #3
and earlier this morning I read satire about Sarah Palin and thought it was the truth. Tuesday Afternoon May 2014 #4
I wish I could get funding to study the effects of water on sand - Tuesday Afternoon May 2014 #5
I read it and STILL thought it was satire. n/t Tansy_Gold May 2014 #7
LOL ismnotwasm May 2014 #8
IKR Tuesday Afternoon May 2014 #9
I'd like to get funding JustAnotherGen May 2014 #10
Maybe you just aren't targeting the right (male) scientist Kber May 2014 #11
I think there needs to be a study that examines Squinch May 2014 #12
Bwahahahaha !!! ismnotwasm May 2014 #13
haha, me too. ellenrr May 2014 #14

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
5. I wish I could get funding to study the effects of water on sand -
Fri May 2, 2014, 12:39 PM
May 2014

I most definitely would need a trip to the beach to see it occurring in a natural locale

ismnotwasm

(41,971 posts)
8. LOL
Fri May 2, 2014, 12:49 PM
May 2014


I know it has that studied seriousness satire often has.

I still say give me the money, I could do a study like this and include ALL women

JustAnotherGen

(31,798 posts)
10. I'd like to get funding
Fri May 2, 2014, 01:45 PM
May 2014

To study how many Kir Royales I can drink in St. Tropez on the beach before I get lit in the hot summer sun.

But - no (male scientist) one is ever interested in what women REALL want!

Kber

(5,043 posts)
11. Maybe you just aren't targeting the right (male) scientist
Fri May 2, 2014, 02:00 PM
May 2014

To fund your research?

There's got to be someone who'd like to do a direct observational experiment.

Squinch

(50,932 posts)
12. I think there needs to be a study that examines
Fri May 2, 2014, 04:09 PM
May 2014

how much women like it when someone else cleans their home during different phases of their cycles. It should be a very long term study. Like 10 or 20 years.

I will selflessly volunteer to be a guinea pig for that one.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Study Finds That Women Ar...