LA Times: Women are leaving the tech industry in droves

[YoungDemCA]

snip:

"There are a lot of things that piled up over the years," (Garann) Means said. "I didn't know how to move forward. There was a lot I had to put up with in the culture of tech. It just didn't seem worth it."

That's a huge problem for the tech economy. According to the industry group Code.org, computing jobs will more than double by 2020, to 1.4 million. If women continue to leave the field, an already dire shortage of qualified tech workers will grow worse. Last summer, Google, Facebook, Apple and other big tech companies released figures showing that men outnumbered women 4 to 1 or more in their technical sectors.

It's why the industry is so eager to hire women and minorities. For decades tech companies have relied on a workforce of whites and Asians, most of them men.

Plenty of programs now encourage girls and minorities to embrace technology at a young age. But amid all the publicity for those efforts, one truth is little discussed: Qualified women are leaving the tech industry in droves.

snip:

A Harvard Business Review study from 2008 found that as many as 50% of women working in science, engineering and technology will, over time, leave because of hostile work environments.

The reasons are varied. According to the Harvard study, they include a "hostile" male culture, a sense of isolation and lack of a clear career path. An updated study in 2014 found the reasons hadn't significantly changed.

Most women in the Harvard study said the attitudes holding them back are subtle, and hence more difficult to challenge.

'

Although high-profile women such as Yahoo's Marissa Mayer, Hewlett-Packard's Meg Whitman and IBM's Ginni Rometty mark glass-ceiling victories for women, most tech companies are headed by men.

And simply having a female CEO does not in itself solve the problem. Men are crucial for creating an environment where women thrive, said Scarlett Sieber, 27, vice president of operations at tech company Infomous.

"Men need to be the ones that are advocating and pushing for women to rise up, and not just rely on the 1% of women who are already at the top to do it," Sieber said.

Full article: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-women-tech-20150222-story.html#page=1

[peacebird]

1. First tech conference I went to, 1985, there were 90 men & me

First satellite program there was one other woman in the whole building who was not a secretary.
By my second satellite we had three more young women engineers. It is improving, but not fast enough, and the wage gap between women & men is still a huge problem.

[mackerel]

2. Odd though, considering in other fields women are catching up, e.g. Law, medicine, accounting,

banking & finance.

[mopinko]

3. need more women owned businesses is all.

[jeff47]

4. Aside from the gender issue, there's an advancement issue that cuts across gender.

Technology firms have a general advancement problem. Largely due to the variety of skillsets required.

It used to be that someone who was particularly good at a job eventually got promoted to supervisor/manager of that job. And then they'd work their way up the management chain. That's primarily the model still used in technology companies.

However, it really doesn't work well. It is extremely rare to find people who have good technical skills and good "people" skills. So you end up with people who have lots and lots of technical experience, but there's no where for them to advance. They aren't good at (or willing to) manage other people. But they're great at designing systems and other technical management.

The industry is going to need to develop two "advancement" tracks. First, so that there's somewhere for people to advance without managing other people.

And second, because there's a massive gaping hole in technical management at virtually all high-tech companies. Someone needs the authority of an executive, but only on technical matters so they don't have to manage people. Otherwise you get a whole lot of plans thought up by MBAs without any vision of what the system can really do, or what the system can't do.

That would help some of the women in the article - there would be somewhere for them to advance. Still wouldn't solve the sexism.