Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Neil deGrasse Tyson's Provocative Tweets About Christmas Started An Internet Flame War (Original Post) hrmjustin Dec 2014 OP
The narcissism of fame. TM99 Dec 2014 #1
I agree he knew what he was doing. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #2
I doubt any here would have been offended no matter TM99 Dec 2014 #4
Yep! I like him on science but this was just done to start in. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #5
Prior to the boom of social media, TM99 Dec 2014 #6
Well everbody is an expert on everything now. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #7
No kidding! TM99 Dec 2014 #9
Lol i know what you mean. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #10
Sibling rivalry. okasha Dec 2014 #3
Now that Hitchens is dead, TM99 Dec 2014 #8
Let's see if he can stay on this Shetland pony first. okasha Dec 2014 #13
I don't see him as part of that group at all. cbayer Dec 2014 #12
Well, as NDT is my secret love, I'm not going to be able to criticize him on this. cbayer Dec 2014 #11
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
1. The narcissism of fame.
Sun Dec 28, 2014, 10:00 AM
Dec 2014

Tyson is a smart man, that is obvious, but really what was the point of his Tweets?

He says it was to be factual and funny? He knew it would be offensive to many. He did it because he could. He seems to be enjoying the limelight and the reTweets.

Free speech is cool. It doesn't mean that we should just spout off anything we want just to stir the pot. But that's modernity for you. When we act narcissistically, we fail to see how our words may impact or affect someone else. It is just about us.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
2. I agree he knew what he was doing.
Sun Dec 28, 2014, 10:07 AM
Dec 2014

I can't say I am offended but it did zeem like he was aiming to offend a few.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
4. I doubt any here would have been offended no matter
Sun Dec 28, 2014, 04:25 PM
Dec 2014

whether belief or non-belief is our stance.

Those that would be are of course going to reTweet and grouse about it thereby increasing hit-counts and making him popular.

It is just an ego-stroke - nothing more.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
6. Prior to the boom of social media,
Sun Dec 28, 2014, 04:31 PM
Dec 2014

scientists did science in their own specialized fields. Now we have biologists, physicists, etc. discussing religion, history, & philosophy without the background education or experience to make such 'studious' pronouncements.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
10. Lol i know what you mean.
Sun Dec 28, 2014, 04:36 PM
Dec 2014

I knowmy knowledge is limited on many subjects so I stay away from them and just read.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
12. I don't see him as part of that group at all.
Sun Dec 28, 2014, 05:08 PM
Dec 2014

He's more in league with someone like Ricky Gervais, who also makes brief but provocative remarks about religion.

But then I am prejudiced with regards to both of them.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
11. Well, as NDT is my secret love, I'm not going to be able to criticize him on this.
Sun Dec 28, 2014, 05:07 PM
Dec 2014

It's rather silly and only mildly provocative.

He also provokes atheists with his stand on not being one, so he's an equal opportunity poker.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»Neil deGrasse Tyson's Pro...