"Can Sanders fill the Warren void?"
CNN
5/1/2015
Washington (CNN)Bernie Sanders has a problem: He isn't Elizabeth Warren.
...Sanders, who is heading to New Hampshire for his first official campaign appearances on Saturday, wants to be that liberal option. His core positions -- breaking up Wall Street banks, making public college free, investing billions on infrastructure and guaranteeing health care for all -- are the same issues liberal groups have been championing for years. And his early campaign is starting to court organizers in key presidential states.
But as he settles into the Democratic presidential race, the response from some liberal groups and organizers has been markedly more focused on Warren, the middle-class champion and former Harvard professor, not Sanders, the Brooklyn-born, independent lawmaker with a gruff personality and an affinity for the moniker "democratic socialist."
Anna Galland, executive director of MoveOn.org Civic Action, welcomed Sanders into the race and touted his record on Wednesday before noting that the Vermont-based Move On and their allies would "continue to call on Sen. Elizabeth Warren to also bring her tireless advocacy for middle-class and working Americans to the race."
Democracy for America, another liberal group whose views track closely with Sanders, had a similar reaction.
Our "members are excited to have progressive champion Senator Bernie Sanders join the 2016 presidential race," said Charles Chamberlain, the group's executive director, before adding, "We continue to encourage Senator Elizabeth Warren to join the race for president."
..."I like his views, I like him a lot," said Timothy Horrigan, a liberal New Hampshire representative, before listing all the ways Bernie isn't Elizabeth.
"She is more plausible as a president," Horrigan said. "They have similar messages but they have different styles, and her style appeals to a lot of people. She is sort of like Hillary without all the baggage and just a stronger progressive message."
Many in the progressive movement are uncomfortable with questions about why they are supporting Warren over Sanders....
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/01/politics/bernie-sanders-elizabeth-warren-progressives/
*That last posted sentence, that would be me. I realize my still backing the effort to encourage Warren to change her mind and run for president puts me at odds with most of my fellow FDR Dem DUers.
I will support Bernie once the primaries begin, if Warren hasn't jumped in. But it will be with much less enthusiasm than it would be for Warren if she were running. And it is extremely uncomfortable.
The reason I still want Liz to run is spelled out in the following article. My apologizes to my friends here who will vigorously disagree~
That analysis is correct. Sanders doesn’t have Warren’s charisma or her fundraising base. The “Run Warren Run” Facebook page has ten times more likes than the “Ready for Bernie” page. Her national profile far exceeds his. Among the chattering classes, Warren would be a serious challenger to Clinton. Sanders isn’t.
But even in that best-case scenario, with labor groups supporting him over Clinton, Sanders has approximately no chance of winning. When I asked Ruy Teixeira, a Democratic strategist, whether that hypothetical could put Clinton’s nomination at stake, he responded, “An easy one: No.”
To be fair to Sanders, he’s not entering the race expecting a victory. Citing “confidants,” the Washington Post reported Tuesday that he was mostly entering the race to participate in the debates. Fair enough. Sanders, not one to pull punches, will certainly try to rough Clinton up in any debates. Maybe he can nudge her to the left, particularly on trade. If that happens, his presidential run will be a success.
For the thousands of liberals dreaming of a Warren presidency, simply pushing Clinton to the left isn’t enough. They want to win; Sanders can’t accomplish that. So the futile campaign to convince Warren to enter the race will continue.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121674/liberals-want-elizabeth-warren-over-bernie-sanders-because-she-can-win
= new reply since forum marked as read
If Warren isn't running for President, then I expect to see her stumping for Bernie addressing Wall Street/Main Street issues (which she is an expert on) from the Populist side. Move On and DFA could throw their support behind Bernie later on. There's no need now for them to drop Elizabeth and declare for Bernie. We need both voices speaking out against failed policies and working towards a new Populist future for the Democratic Party. Now that Bernie has announced he can chart his own way with funding and it may actually be better for him not to have automatic support from Move on and DFA at this point in time if he is to attract a broader group of voters and show the Republican Clown Car up for what they are by focusing on issues they refuse to address.
Warren's weakness is Foreign Policy. That's going to be an issue that needs to be front and center in the 2016 Election. If we can't get our Foreign Policy in hand we won't have money for anything for the working people. We've spent too much in growing our vast Military Industrial Complex and caused chaos, death and destruction in MENA that will haunt us for decades. Bernie has an advantage with his experience in State Government and the Senate. Warren doesn't have the foreign policy experience and connections that Bernie has which is his advantage.
I support both of them...however it plays out. 
