Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
Thu May 28, 2015, 05:43 PM May 2015

WV Delegate Mike Caputo: Coal Jobs and Safety Act not really about jobs or safety

Charleston Gazette

In a recent opinion column, Chris Hamilton of the West Virginia Coal Association dismissed the assertion that Senate Bill 357 — the erroneously entitled Coal Jobs and Safety Act of 2015 — is a rollback of mine safety regulations as a “misnomer.”

He is quick to characterize all those who disagree with the legislation as being anti-coal and against coal job creation. As a pro-coal, United Mine Workers of America coal miner, I am compelled to respond.

. ...

... This extreme legislation loosens coal mining safety regulations to the benefit of big corporations without any regard for worker safety.

One problem with debating this type of issue in a public forum is such laws are technically complicated. This requires understanding of underground mining safety practices, rather than a discussion reduced to sound bites.

Within that legislation, there were three significant changes in law that underground safety experts at the United Mine Workers of America and I believe weakened underground mine safety:

| Increase in track distance. The current law requires the track distance to be no farther than 500 feet from the face. This distance could be increased through a “variance,” which requires special provisions must be in place to guarantee that an increased distance must be “as safe or safer than” existing law. ... The new law allows a distance of 1,500 feet (that’s five football fields) without a variance. This will greatly increase time when an injured miner needs transported to the outside for medical emergencies.

... An incapacitated miner now may have to be carried up to five football fields underground in rough terrain to be evacuated. Allowing such a distance could cost a miner’s life, but it also costs the operator less money.

| The diesel commission was abolished. The commission was established in the late 90s, when the Legislature allowed diesel equipment to be used in West Virginia mines. The commission, made up of three from industry and three from labor, reviewed proposed diesel packages submitted by companies to insure the equipment met all emission and safety standards before entering the mine. It was also charged with the duty of reviewing new, better, and ever-changing technology, ...

All of these responsibilities now go to the director. My fear is that all equipment will be “rubber stamped” without careful review or regard for new technology.

| Moving of equipment. Moving of equipment with miners inby, on the same split of air, is now legal unless energized trolley wire exists. The abnormal moving of large equipment is dangerous to say the least. Anything can happen. Batteries can catch fire, the equipment could come in contact with high voltage cables and catch fire, and so on. If this happens, the smoke will travel to the area where miners are working and could result in a disaster.

. ...

Clearly the title of this bill does nothing to enhance the health and safety of miners. It only puts miners in harm’s way, and profits ahead of safety.

The safety rollbacks contained in S.B.357 have not, and will not, bring one additional job to this state. Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin has agreed to study some of these safety rollbacks to determine if they have gone too far, but wouldn’t it make more sense to do the study prior to changing the law and risking lives?

. ...

More
http://www.wvgazette.com/article/20150527/GZ04/150529508/1453



x p WV

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Appalachia»WV Delegate Mike Caputo: ...