So which states are they going to steal next

[Rosa Luxemburg]

They should re-run the primaries or at least the areas in the state that were subject to voter fraud. This needs to be overseen by an independent body. There no excuses.

[LiberalArkie]

1. I believe New York will be the main one.

[Dragonfli]

25. They are screwing withe the databases here, removing Democratic affiliation from many

They did it not just to me, but others as well, all appear to be hose likely to vote Sanders in the primary, since they effectively "kicked me out" of my party of 37 years, unless Sanders wins the primary, I will write in my primary vote for Sanders at the time of the general election thereby taking back my primary vote that belongs to me, and vote working families party down ticket of the presidency, (they endorse nearly always Democrats but chose the ones that are the most working family friendly rather than party backed).

And, since they no longer want this Democrat, there will be one fewer Democrat in the future, likely more, with a little more effort (if enough has not already been put forth) by DWS, Democratic enrollment will drop yet again, likely down to 25% after this primary clusterfuck. She has done such a bang up job so far deceasing Democratic enrollment that the party should give her a medal.

[Else You Are Mad]

2. Well..

Thom Hartmann said that there have been flipped registrations in NY, and today is the last day to register as a Democrat & it is a closed election state. Hmmm... So look out for NY.

[xloadiex]

6. There are reports of it going on in Philly too.

Absentee ballots are flooding into Wa also.
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/absentee-votes-flood-in-before-democratic-caucuses/

In addition to emails, the Clinton camp sent a mailer to tens of thousands of voters, which included an appeal from former President Clinton along with affidavit forms and a postage-paid return envelope.

[Rosa Luxemburg]

7. People need to go up to their election board to verify their registration

Get them to check the registration just before the election and if it has been changed at the polls then someone along the line has been changing them. Record who you spoke to

[BernieforPres2016]

12. From what I just read in the Buffalo paper online it is worse than that

New York voters can only register online today because state offices are closed for Good Friday. Today is the end of voter registration for a primary that is still over 3 weeks off.

And New York state law says that any change in voter registration between parties, or from Independent to Democratic or Republican, will not take effect until after the November election. So Independent voters who decided to switch their registrations to Democratic and vote for Sanders in the April 19 primary will not be able to vote in the Democratic primary.

I don't see any way Bernie is going to beat Hillary in New York with a closed primary and independents blocked from switching to Democratic to vote in the primary.

[Else You Are Mad]

14. It is disgusting.

The problem is that those that make the rules are the ones that want to stay in power.

[BernieforPres2016]

26. Both parties wanted it that way

Better to help their establishment candidates get the nomination. They don't want Independents to see if they like a candidate in either party and then vote in their primary.

So if you're an Independent, both parties are saying we will give you the 2 choices you have in November. You don't have any say in it.

[stillwaiting]

17. That is a direct attack on an open and democratic society. Direct attack. nt

[salinsky]

3. Who is stealing states? ... nt

[Rosa Luxemburg]

8. You tell me

[salinsky]

10. Ummm ... Rightwing SCOTUS justices ...

... appointed by Republican presidents?

That might be something we should look to avoid.

[Dragonfli]

15. They are changing databases in states where the only outcome is long time Democrats

cant vote in their own primary?

Interesting theory, I give you points for absurd creativity.

[yourpaljoey]

4. They have their 'strategy' planned so that no stolen states can be contested

This might force Bernie to run Independent.

[Kip Humphrey]

5. Wisconsin, New York, New Jersey, & Washington. BTW, it is "election fraud", not "voter fraud",

unless, that is, you are a republicon.

[LonePirate]

16. NY is a closed primary. The deadline has already passed to change party affiliations.

Brand new voter registrations end today.

[Kip Humphrey]

20. Beware party affiliation flipping in New York. Seems to be a feature wherever

registration software has been integrated with GEMS vote tabulating software (sometimes referred to as eBook registration software).

[LonePirate]

21. I think the party change deadline was back in October so changes since then are ineligible to vote.

I expect there will be numerous reports of people who changed party affiliation between October and March who will not be allowed to vote. I'm guessing many will claim it to be voter suppression.

[Kip Humphrey]

23. The end of new registrations and changing of your registration information was yesterday with the

devious little reported caveat that if you made changes online on the day before the deadline, those changes would not be recorded before the end of the deadline yesterday so will not count for the primary. Changes made at registrar offices in-person yesterday will be recorded and will count for the primary. Cute, eh?

[GoneFishin]

9. The ones with the most delegates. They will risk being exposed so they will focus on the most gains

for the least risk. Or they will go after states which, for whatever reason are easy targets, like if the Secretary of State was a huge Hillary fan.

[jeff47]

11. Election fraud. Not voter fraud.

It's voter fraud when the voter does something wrong. It's election fraud when the people running the election do something wrong.

[Rosa Luxemburg]

13. In other countries they have people watching over elections

[Dragonfli]

18. We have, and I say this honestly without hyperbole, reached the point where our elections need UN

Monitoring as is often the case with second and third world Oligarchies and rogue governments that break their own laws.
It really has gotten so bad that my statement is not an exaggeration or an overreaction, but simple truth.

[Rosa Luxemburg]

19. Yes

[VulgarPoet]

22. Cali, Philly, and Alaska.

New York won't be a steal-- it's practically in her back yard.

[Scuba]

24. Wisconsin. The state party leadership has recently changed, but their allegiance ...

... to Democratic Party voters remains questionable.

http://bloggingblue.com/2015/08/democratic-party-of-wisconsin-signs-fundraising-pact-with-hillary-clinton/

Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaign has received commitments from four Democratic state parties, including in the crucial proving ground of New Hampshire, to enter joint fund-raising agreements with the campaign just as the nomination battle is beginning.

The four are a small fraction of the dozens of state parties that the Hillary for America campaign has asked to join such agreements. Many are still considering the request; some officials said they are working through how the arrangement would be put into effect while the nominating fight is underway.

Mississippi, Virginia and Wisconsin have also signed agreements with the Clinton team, according to two people briefed on the issue who were not authorized to speak publicly.

State Party Chair Martha Laning has been under fire for this since it became public. She has claimed to be neutral but her actions have put the lie to her words.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Wisconsin4Sanders/comments/3im4ii/wi_democratic_party_agreement_sends_half_your/

According to the NY Times article, this agreement between the WI Democratic Party and the Hillary Clinton campaign also allows "the state parties access to more resources and allow extra help with voter registration and other matters."

As the Church Lady used to say: "Isn't that special?"

You might ask why the state Democratic party would enter into this agreement, and that is a good question. The answer is what has been driving politics since the disastrous Citizens United decision: $ money $!

According to the <a href="

">Sane Progressive</a>,

"Clinton's funders are so large that the real motivation of this isn't to get money from the states. It is too FUNNEL money to the state's by her funders (who will donate directly to the state party) and thus gain influence and control of that state's party through her funding."