Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumAnother Clinton Bombshell?
Recent news reports indicate that the FBI is investigating former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for granting favors to her familys foundation donors and for its systematic accounting fraud. In January, the Sunday Times of London cited former Judge Andrew Napolitano, a conservative libertarian and frequent Fox News guest, as saying that the FBI was taking evidence seriously and that Hillary could hear about that soon from the Department of Justice.
Its hard to believe that the Obama administration and its hideously politicized Justice Department would ever indict Ms. Clinton, given that President Barack Obama picked her for secretary of state and its clear favoritism toward her in the presidential race. But there is massive evidence that shows financial abusesincluding money launderingat the Clinton Foundation and overwhelming evidence that donors were helped by Ms. Clinton.
To take one of so many examples, theres the case of Clinton Foundation donor Claudio Osoriowho is now housed at a federal prison serving 12 years for fraudwho in 2010, with Ms. Clintons (and Bill Clintons) help, won a $10 million loan from the Overseas Private Investment Corporation.
####### MORE AT LINK #########
http://observer.com/2016/03/bombshell-clinton-foundation-donors-flight-from-justice-aided-by-hillary-allies/
Faux pas
(14,657 posts)WDIM
(1,662 posts)Boeing and the Saudis know Clinton can be bought.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/05/hillary-clinton-foundation-state-arms-deals
AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)"...and everybody does it!"
I've been here for all of what, five weeks, and already I know the standard Clintonite responses to everything.
WDIM
(1,662 posts)The IRW vote was complex
Receiving money from Dictators is complex
Giving dictators killing machines is complex
We just can't understand all the complexities she has to deal with.
AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)I guess we are privileged to have someone who can handle all these complexities so our pretty little minds won't have to fuss over it.
appalachiablue
(41,113 posts)'complexity' and 'consensus' as favorite vocabulary items used by the vaunted, professional, centrist-neoliberal power class (aka the 'creative class') who design 'complex' tech products, intricate (and expensive) biochemical pharmaceuticals, synthetic derivatives and other financial, wizard products..
A bunch of tired, overused hack terms in circulation for 20+ years, and he's right.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)then they have no right to claim that people who compare democrats to republicans are morons.
AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)"Jeff Skilling did it, why can't Hillary do it?"
appalachiablue
(41,113 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Stick around long enough and you will get a lot of label thrown at you if you don't just lie down and accept the coronation.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)a. She concedes the Democratic primary nomination, or
b. She loses the Presidential race in November, or
c. She's impeached and forced from office, or
d. Never
the universe attains maximum entropy
thereismore
(13,326 posts)LiberalArkie
(15,705 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)A handful of accusations can be called RW smear attacks and can be excused away . But after all the accusations made against the Clintons over the 30 years of public life, there has to be some truth in the accusations. The only reason the Clintons have been able to brush off all these accusations is their money, power and political equity. Since Nixon, when has there ever been as many accusations against a politician?
I am sorry, but there have been too many instances of criminal and unethical activities to be just RW political smears.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)"smearing" her until she becomes POTUS, when they suddenly have a change of heart and will want to get stuff done with her. Right.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)They will forget their 30 or so years of trying to take her down and will just roll over and let her get stuff done.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)they would just indict her and be done with it!
She shouldn't even be allowed to run for president while being under an FBI CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION ! Since when is that allowed and acceptable?
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)WDIM
(1,662 posts)And when they do they dont really talk about what she is being investigated for and water it down.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,159 posts)under investigation speaks volumes to me. The arrogance! The head of the FBI is Republican. While I realize Obama won't have her indicted, if she is elected and the Senate stays under GOP control, they will start impeachment proceedings the day she is inaugurated! The only good outcome is for her to be exonerated by the FBI prior to the convention, and I just don't see that happening.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)farleftlib
(2,125 posts)The allegations here are very damning if true and are easily corroborated. Some Venezuelan crook is hiding in FLA and tried to take down a decorated DEA agent by lying to the FBI and a grand jury. The case against the agent was so transparently bad that the judge took it out of the jury's hands and just acquitted the guy and reamed the prosecution. That is amazing. He's still here in the States after all this.
The name Clinton has become synonymous with corruption, scandal and backroom dirty dealing.
Of course the Hillbots don't care. "It's a RW smear."
K & R
4139
(1,893 posts)...finding stuff in August or September and risk impeachment of the Attorney General.
DamnYankeeInHouston
(1,365 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I hope Obama doesn't sacrifice his reputation and legacy to protect a crook. She should face the consequences of her own actions.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)OMG Becky! Now the Bernie Bros are smearing email servers and throwing them under the bus!!! Under the bus you go, email server!! It's like sooooo crowded under that bus now!!"
Pat Riots
(76 posts)Pat Riots
(76 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Yes, it was sarcasm. I put a at the end of it, that didn't end up in the post.
You have to admit, it's pretty close to the real thing.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I mean, who among us can honestly say he or she has never mistaken $10,000,000.00 for $0.00 at least once when calculating annual income from abroad?
As for the $10,000,000 loan, all I can say is, who is this Osorio of whom you speak? (Seriously, that's the only thing I can think of to say.)
Financial abuses, money laundering. I beg your pardon. We never promised you the White House Rose Garden! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_pardon_controversy
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Grifters believe everyone is a sucker.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)It never ends
corbettkroehler
(1,898 posts)I'm afraid that he would feel it a blemish on his legacy.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Shit will hit the proverbial fan.
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)He has no reason to protect her, and every reason not to.
Wednesdays
(17,331 posts)That just one phone call from Obama and the investigation would end immediately. But that's not happening, which means Obama's not going to risk his reputation to save Hillary (why would he, anyway? He wasn't part of the mess to begin with). If things get really bad, he may just leave Hillary twisting in the wind.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)would be Karma.
Duppers
(28,117 posts)Kicked and RECOMMENDED.