Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumDoctor_J
(36,392 posts)I honestly can't think of a reason why someone would support her over Sanders.
monmouth4
(9,686 posts)thegoodlifedem
(5 posts)CNN finally put one little part out that is correct: After tonight's victories, Sanders will likely cut into Clinton's PLEDGED delegate lead by around 60 to 70 delegates, depending on how it all pans out. He only needs to make up around 250 to 260 PLEDGED delegates at that point, which can be done, especially if the campaign continues to build steam in Wisconsin, New York and California to name a few.
http://frontloading.blogspot.com/p/2016-democratic-delegate-allocation.html
Scroll down to footnote # 2, AND I QUOTE:
"While this group of delegates is unpledged, that does not mean that they cannot pledge their support to a candidate nor does it mean that such a pledge is binding and/or can not be changed to another candidate."
AKA the superdelegates which are being used to make it look like Clinton has an insurmountable lead big are really all in play.
So when you hear or see or read the conventional wisdom about Clinton having it wrapped up, DON'T BELIEVE THE HYPE
and let's go grassroots like we never have before to bring about a victory for Bernie!
Duppers
(28,117 posts)Thank you.