Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders has had consistent message for 4 decades
Once a democratic socialist, always a democratic socialist. Once a scold of big money in politics, still a scold.
No one can accuse Bernie Sanders of flip-flopping over his four decades in public life. Rock steady, he's inhabited the same ideological corner from which he now takes on Hillary Rodham Clinton in an improbable quest for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016.
Here he is in 1974, as the 32-year-old candidate for U.S. Senate of a fledgling leftist party in Vermont called Liberty Union: "A handful of banks and billionaires control the economic and political life of America. ... America is becoming less and less of a democracy and more and more of an oligarchy."
(snip)
Steady-as-he-goes Sanders has been at it for decades. He's admired Canada's single-payer health care system since way back, talking up "nationalized health care" during his unsuccessful run for Congress in 1988. When Republicans charge that Democrats would bring European-style socialism to the U.S., Sanders says bring it on.
http://news.yahoo.com/bernie-sanders-had-consistent-message-4-decades-073148655--election.html
Scuba
(53,475 posts)BERNIE SANDERS: Well, so long as we know what democratic socialism is, and if we know that in countries in Scandinavia, like Denmark and Norway and Sweden, they are very democratic countries. Obviously, their voter turnout is higher than it is in the United States. In those countries, health care is the right of all people. In those countries, college education, graduate school is free. In those countries retirement benefits, childcare are stronger than the United States of America. And in those countries, by and large, government works for ordinary people in the middle class rather than as, is the case in our country, for the billionaire class.
STEPHANOPOULOS: I can hear the Republican attack ad right now: He wants America to look more like Scandinavia.
SANDERS: Thats right. Thats right. Whats wrong with that? Whats wrong when you have more income and wealth equality. Whats wrong when they have a stronger middle class in many ways than we do, a higher minimum wage than we do, and theyre stronger on the environment than we do? The fact of the matter is that we do a lot in our country, which is good, but we can learn from other countries. We have, George, the highest rate of childhood poverty of any major country on earth at the same time as were seeing a proliferation of millionaires and billionaires. Frankly, I dont think thats sustainable. I dont think thats what America is about.