Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumClinton's Lead is Dropping like a Lead Brick
So you have to figure that, when 2016 rolled around and everyone was saying, "No, this horse is a sure thing," she was a bit wary. But she got on. She ran strong. She did well. And now, in the final turn, there might be something wrong with the saddle.
If we compare where Clinton is now in the Real Clear Politics polling average, the 2016 picture and the 2008 picture aren't really all that similar. Nationally, she was doing much better in 2008 than she is right now, perhaps in part because the anti-Clinton vote in 2008 was still split between two people -- Barack Obama and John Edwards -- instead of just one. But that recent trend line, a function of two new national polls that were close after a bit of a lull, is not very good news.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/01/14/hillary-clintons-national-lead-is-slipping-faster-in-2016-than-it-did-in-2008/?postshare=5981452798281465&tid=ss_in
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)about how awful Millennials and pot legalization are.
Yeah, that's the ticket!
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)Just for reference.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)"This sucks! Change it!"
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)a point that we've made often before -- is that voting changes polling. If you look at her national numbers after Iowa in 2008, she lost three-quarters of her lead after the caucuses -- but gained some of it back after her win in New Hampshire.
It's going to look even worse if she loses both IA and NH. It may be the snowball that ends her run on Super Tuesday so significantly that she won't hold out until the very end to admit defeat like she did in '08.
Keep getting the word out, keep motivating primary voters.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I've only heard this from right-wing sources, which aren't the most trustworthy, but IF it is true, that snowball will be more like this one.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)but I don't think it's coming. at least not before the end of the primary.
Obama is still in the WH and I'm sure if it was even a remote possibility there would have been conversations.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)they really don't give a crap about politics. If they think there's a crime, they'll pursue it.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)but the Director of the FBI does serve at the pleasure of the POTUS.
How is their relationship? I have no idea and won't really speculate on it.... because I truly have no idea.
Either way, I would rather see Bernie seal this nomination with our votes, not an investigation against Hillary.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)What happens if she does get the nomination and then gets indicted?
draa
(975 posts)I'm not sure of the procedure should that happen but she certainly couldn't continue as the nominee. I suppose Bernie could step in but I doubt that would fly with the DNC. If they defeat him in the primary he's no longer a threat. I seriously doubt the Democratic establishment would open that door again.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)I know in my state (Pennsylvania) individual, indicted-but-not-yet-convicted, elected officials continue to "serve" and of course collect salaries and benefits, until actually convicted, at which time they are stripped of office. We have gone through this with indicted state representatives, state senators and state supreme court justices. We currently have a state Attorney General who has been stripped of her law license by the state bar association, but continues in office.
But case law has established that even CONVICTED felons can run for, be elected to and hold federal office.
Nodine is not the first man behind bars to seek the chance to serve the public while serving time. In 2002, former Rep. James Traficant, I-Ohio, took 15 percent of the vote even though he had just started an eight-year sentence for bribery, racketeering and other crimes. Going farther back in history, Matthew Lyon was successful in 1798. He had been convicted of libel, ran for Congress from prison and won.
The Constitution lists three conditions one must meet to be a candidate for the House of Representatives -- you must be at least 25 years old, have been a citizen for at least seven years and live in the state you hope to represent. These are all that are required, and states may not add to them, for example, by prohibiting a felon from running for office. According to a 2002 Congressional Research Service report, these conditions "are fixed and may not be supplemented by Congress nor by any State unilaterally."
States have more leeway when it comes to setting rules for who may hold state level office, but they have none at the federal level. The Supreme Court, in a case involving term limits, made it clear that states may not interfere. In U.S. Term Limits, Inc. vs. Thornton, the court struck down an amendment to the Arkansas constitution that limited those elected to Congress to three terms in the House and two in the Senate.
The court explained in its decision that not only states but even Congress itself could not "impose additional qualifications (that) would violate that fundamental principle of our representative democracy . . . that the people should choose whom they please to govern them," according to an analysis in the Brigham Young University Law Review.
However, federal law does not protect anyone's right to run as a member of a poltical party.
Justin Levitt, professor at Loyola Law School, has more discouraging news for Nodine. "Nodine is right that federal law protects his right to run," Levitt said, "But it doesn't likely protect his right to run as a Republican, or even to run for the right to run as a Republican standard-bearer." So long as parties dont discriminate in ways banned by the Constitution -- on the basis of race or religion for example -- then they can do much as they please, Levitt said.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/jun/25/stephen-nodine/can-convicted-felon-run-congress-jail/
Based on the Clintons' past performance, I believe Hillary would NEVER voluntarily withdraw her candidacy, if indicted, either during the primary or the general election. This would be the penultimate hot Clinton mess to engulf the country - oh, and how delighted Putin and other foreign powers would be to see the U.S. distracted by a protracted legal battle, and what advantages would they seek to take under such circumstances?
draa
(975 posts)Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)mostly because I don't think Hillary can win the GE.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)It will be interesting to see what and if anything develops.
Duckfan
(1,268 posts)That can be a good indicator!
Can't wait for Iowa vote. Damn I'm getting excited.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)to be on the cusp of a serious shot at taking the first two states.....
Well, everyone, even the majority of Bernie's supporters, said we would love it but come on... it can't happen right?
I've been saying for 2 months, I think there's gonna be a lot of shocked people around here when the voting starts.
draa
(975 posts)she likely won't win the WH even if she wins the nomination.
That's the reason you see the panic right now. Since 1972 only her husband has lost both and won the WH. I think 4 people have been in position to do it and only one has. And people loved Bill Clinton in 1992 when he accomplished it. He was a "I'd like to have a beer with him" type candidate. Hillary? Not so much from the looks of it.
If she loses both she's in deep trouble.
The MSM and polling changes instantly if Bernie takes IA, it goes berserk when he follows up with NH.
While it's not over until it's actually over, everything changes if the first two sway towards Bernie.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Duckfan
(1,268 posts)Quote: "I refuse to vote for the lesser of 2 corporate evils"
The millennials and independents are going to come out in droves for Bernie. Hillary is on a sinking ship.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Akamai
(1,779 posts)Akamai
(1,779 posts)I am happy to be able to do it!
Go, Bernie!!!
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)3AM Phonecall!
BOO!
Duckfan
(1,268 posts)Gene Debs
(582 posts)put it past the the DNC and Wasserman-Schultz to try and rig Iowa and New Hampshire, and I wouldn't put it past Clinton to let them do it.
Ino
(3,366 posts)of the prophetic Kentucky Derby in 2008.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/03/kentucky-derby-horse-eigh_n_99987.html
(snip)
Eight Belles actually ended up finishing second in the race, just behind Big Brown.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)That was the LAST horse race I've ever watched. Tired of seeing animals abused for our entertainment.