Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ASTOUNDING (Original Post) merrily Jan 2016 OP
And here's their award. draa Jan 2016 #1
That would be a good award if the omission were unintentional. I don't think it is. merrily Jan 2016 #2
Then I believe it still holds true. draa Jan 2016 #3
They've definitely been treating her better than they've been treating Sanders. merrily Jan 2016 #4
You get no arguments there. draa Jan 2016 #6
It seems to me PATRICK Jan 2016 #54
They cannot discuss this until she is anointed the nominee FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #5
Was going to make the same point. zeemike Jan 2016 #7
+1000 sinkingfeeling Jan 2016 #10
And then it will be nothing but this 24/7. Not good. SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #16
If she's the nominee, this will definitely be heard a lot. merrily Jan 2016 #21
Maybe this is an indication of just how unimportant "classified" information is. malthaussen Jan 2016 #8
Thanks for explaining why Chelsea Manning is in jail d_legendary1 Jan 2016 #13
Precisely. n/t malthaussen Jan 2016 #14
+1 to that. Some of the animals are more equal than others. nt raouldukelives Jan 2016 #18
But voting booths are mostly for peons. merrily Jan 2016 #22
Yep malthaussen Jan 2016 #25
All This Could Have Been Avoided gordyfl Jan 2016 #9
Golly I can’t think of a single reason why she’d want to sidestep FOIA requests! dorkzilla Jan 2016 #24
Do you know the date of that video? The date of the IG's letter was January 14. Apparently, the merrily Jan 2016 #30
Sunday I think... dorkzilla Jan 2016 #32
Thanks. And nothing about the IG's letter from Thursday. What a stench! merrily Jan 2016 #44
stinks to high heaven. dorkzilla Jan 2016 #45
Nice! Thanks. merrily Jan 2016 #46
Good Observation. gordyfl Jan 2016 #33
Thanks! Don't trust any network, especially when it comes to politics. Remember the run up to merrily Jan 2016 #41
Wow. Just, wow. senz Jan 2016 #34
Absolutely, senz! merrily Jan 2016 #40
I voted for Bill Clinton and spent the next eight years defending him senz Jan 2016 #51
Many people put it at the deaths of the Kennedy brothers, but we can drive ourselves to distraction merrily Jan 2016 #52
So Clinton's reelection was chalked up to triangulation? senz Jan 2016 #53
Shortly after his first election, Obama self-identified as a New Democrat. merrily Jan 2016 #55
Yes! This time she couldn't even muster up the phony laugh. senz Jan 2016 #35
Merrily, the lede on the top of the hour on NPR was this story dorkzilla Jan 2016 #37
They can't talk about it until hootinholler Jan 2016 #11
It's just corrupt... SoapBox Jan 2016 #12
oh wait, they're talking about Flint.. 10 seconds! mountain grammy Jan 2016 #15
*On MSNBC now, IG, emails appalachiablue Jan 2016 #17
K&R! Thanks, merrily. Duval Jan 2016 #19
You're very welcome! merrily Jan 2016 #23
She makes the party look bad. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #20
She does! Good point. senz Jan 2016 #36
The Party doesn't seem to care how it looks, or DWS would have been toast after the midterms. merrily Jan 2016 #42
I spell it Corporate Media. guillaumeb Jan 2016 #26
Teddy Roosevelt had the right idea: outlaw monopolies. merrily Jan 2016 #27
And Roosevelt was a Republican. guillaumeb Jan 2016 #28
So was Lincoln. We forget that Republicans used to be the liberals, which is why liberal states lik merrily Jan 2016 #29
Very well put. The hidden history of the Democratic Party. guillaumeb Jan 2016 #31
Not hidden, so much as forgotten. I read an article recently that kept merrily Jan 2016 #43
Another unknown employee will likely be hung on a pole, and HRC will escape HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #38
The guy who pled the Fifth is still out there somewhere. merrily Jan 2016 #39
Posting to get back to. malokvale77 Jan 2016 #47
Rest well, malokvale77 merrily Jan 2016 #48
Don't know name of radio news network Duckfan Jan 2016 #49
ASTOUNDING, right? merrily Jan 2016 #50
The time is not yet ripe to cover it. Autumn Jan 2016 #56
. merrily Jan 2016 #57
Interesting that they discussed it. Has any of the MSM discussed it yet? Autumn Jan 2016 #58
I don't know. I haven't been checking. merrily Jan 2016 #59

draa

(975 posts)
3. Then I believe it still holds true.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:57 AM
Jan 2016

They certainly have their head up their ass if they're intentionally protecting her.

That would be worse that being willfully ignorant. But... it's what we've come to expect concerning the press.

draa

(975 posts)
6. You get no arguments there.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 10:12 AM
Jan 2016

Just think though, it will make winning that much better if we can get it done.

PATRICK

(12,228 posts)
54. It seems to me
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 06:16 AM
Jan 2016

she is getting protection from the Justice Department, maybe not ion GOP style but close. But whatever the merits of the case no one is going to fully take her down politically anymore than past scandals barely investigated affected GOP candidates like Romney in the past. Some goddawful criminals have been given the media pass before. Inherently useless as a social news forum for any country. Those who run the institutions escape scrutiny routinely. Brouhahas over falsehoods or non issues are insulting sideshows to fill the gaps.

It's almost moot what is going on. Accountability is whimsical, cynical or zero.

FlatBaroque

(3,160 posts)
5. They cannot discuss this until she is anointed the nominee
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 10:06 AM
Jan 2016

then the ratings game will be on in full force.

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
8. Maybe this is an indication of just how unimportant "classified" information is.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 10:50 AM
Jan 2016

I recollect reading somewhere-or-other that there is an increasing tendency to overclassify stuff to obfuscate things for the general public. You and I are not "allowed" to know what our government is doing, but for those at the top of the food chain, it is all one big game. Thus an offense that would mean ruin and imprisonment for a lesser being is disregarded when a "major player" commits it. This is seen time and again. Just yesterday, there was a thread that the Pentagon was thinking of taking away one whole star from General Petraeus for his little peccadillo of blabbing soi-disant "secrets." That is the extent of the punishment proposed for someone who committed a flagrant breach of security. Boo-hoo, he'll lose a few thousand in retirement pay every year.

You just don't understand that laws are for peasants, not aristocrats.

-- Mal

malthaussen

(17,175 posts)
25. Yep
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:10 PM
Jan 2016

Too bad more of them don't take advantage of them. (We'll say nothing of conjectural interference with the results)

-- Mal

gordyfl

(598 posts)
9. All This Could Have Been Avoided
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:00 AM
Jan 2016

if she didn't try to side-step the Freedom Of Information Act. I think in the end, she may be accused of avoiding FOIA procedures, and some sort of obstruction.
That's my take.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
24. Golly I can’t think of a single reason why she’d want to sidestep FOIA requests!
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:06 PM
Jan 2016

*cough cough* pay for play *cough cough* Clinton Foundation

If that is indeed the case then she doesn’t only deserve NOT to ever hold a public office again, but she should see criminal charges.

I wonder when they’re going to give the public access to the evidence? Honestly this could be just more trumped up GOP bullshit but it seems like with the involvement of the IG it’s probably more than that. But her campaign is saying its much ado about nothing.

Lastly I watched the clip of Tapper asking her about whether the FBI has questioned her yet...Jesus if looks could kill!

merrily

(45,251 posts)
30. Do you know the date of that video? The date of the IG's letter was January 14. Apparently, the
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:43 PM
Jan 2016

news was held up until well after Sunday's debate!

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
45. stinks to high heaven.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 10:09 PM
Jan 2016

In fact, the fix is in. Sorry Merrily, I’m not not on their payroll...i just love these guys..

merrily

(45,251 posts)
41. Thanks! Don't trust any network, especially when it comes to politics. Remember the run up to
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:34 PM
Jan 2016

the Iraq War? Remember how many times media re-ran the video of the "Dean scream," often with an intro that implied, every so slightly, that he just might be mentally unstable?

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
34. Wow. Just, wow.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 03:16 PM
Jan 2016

Thanks for this thread, merrily. I can't even put my thoughts/feelings into words at the moment. Something is SO rotten in the state of America. Somebody should turn on the garbage disposal and give the sink, and then the whole house, a good cleaning.

This is what power concentrations do: they rot.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
40. Absolutely, senz!
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:18 PM
Jan 2016
Power corrupts.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dalberg-Acton,_1st_Baron_Acton

Bill Clinton seems to have had a significant amount of power within the Democratic Party since he met Senator Fulbright while he (Clinton) was in high school, if not before. And, when he became the first Democratic President since FDR to be elected President more than once, the ballgame was pretty much over. (JMO, except for meeting Fulbright.)

As you know, when one of the national co-chairs of your 2008 Presidential campaign is head of the DNC when you run again, that ain't nutthin. Especially when said Chair was able to retain the position after doing a historically bad job at it.
 

senz

(11,945 posts)
51. I voted for Bill Clinton and spent the next eight years defending him
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 05:17 AM
Jan 2016

though at times I had my doubts about things he was doing. But now, having watched Hillary in 2008 and the present, I've been running a series of useless "what ifs" through my mind, like what if Gary Hart hadn't blown it in the 1980s? And what if California's Jerry Brown had run a better campaign in 1992? I've even wondered what would have happened if Ross Perot had won, b/c at least he was against NAFTA. It seems the Clintons were massively destructive to the Democratic Party. I have a feeling the country would be a better place if Bill hadn't captured the presidency to begin with.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
52. Many people put it at the deaths of the Kennedy brothers, but we can drive ourselves to distraction
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 05:24 AM
Jan 2016

with that.

IMO, it was not so much that he captured it, but that he was re-elected. His re-election marked the first time that a Democrat had been elected twice since FDR. Ergo, Democrats would win more, especially at the Presidential level, if they triangulated more. Politicians make a lot of such bare facts for the populace, but they don't stand up to examination. The devil and the angel of the truth is always in the details.

But the triangulators had money behind them, including Koch money. Liberals, bless them, seldom have the bucks on their side. In Lincoln's world, a liberal could win. In a world where 5 to 7 corporations control most news, it's ever so much harder.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
53. So Clinton's reelection was chalked up to triangulation?
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 05:37 AM
Jan 2016

But then doesn't Obama, at least to some extent, disprove that theory? I realize he sometimes cooperated with tptb, but he's not chummy with the wealthy, as the Clintons are, and he keeps trying to do progressive things. I don't think he's as sold-out as the Clintons.

Good lord but I'm sleepy... hasta manana.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
55. Shortly after his first election, Obama self-identified as a New Democrat.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:04 AM
Jan 2016

Shortly after his second election, Obama said that, in the 1980s, he would have been seen as a moderate Republican.






Clinton was the first Democratic President to run on ending welfare as we know it. Obama was the first Democratic President to pledge to "reform" entitlements, to talk about cutting Social Security and to put Social Security and Medicare on the table. He tried to extend the Iraq War past the date of the SOFA. He "surged" in Afghanistan. He implemented a no fly zone in Iraq, and so on.



 

senz

(11,945 posts)
35. Yes! This time she couldn't even muster up the phony laugh.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jan 2016

So glad you're here and on top of this, dorkzilla!

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
37. Merrily, the lede on the top of the hour on NPR was this story
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 03:53 PM
Jan 2016

Check in at 3pm - maybe it will get more than 30 seconds but I bet it will be the lede at 4 or whenever your local station airs ATC.

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
11. They can't talk about it until
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:07 AM
Jan 2016

They get her talking points, and that won't happen until the focus group is back.

I figure it will be lightly covered next week.

mountain grammy

(26,598 posts)
15. oh wait, they're talking about Flint.. 10 seconds!
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 11:17 AM
Jan 2016

oh wait, they're talking about climate change, noooo, oh wait they're talking about government corruption, noooo. Oh yeah, there's Trump and Palin, 5 minutes.
I'm astounded every single day.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
42. The Party doesn't seem to care how it looks, or DWS would have been toast after the midterms.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:36 PM
Jan 2016

Or a decent number of debates prior to Super Tuesday would have been scheduled. And so on.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
26. I spell it Corporate Media.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:15 PM
Jan 2016

Given that 6 corporations control 90% of the US media, is there any wonder that the narrative ignores so much of what is happening?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
27. Teddy Roosevelt had the right idea: outlaw monopolies.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:35 PM
Jan 2016

Government should never have allowed news media to get into so few hands.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
28. And Roosevelt was a Republican.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:37 PM
Jan 2016

How things have changed. The change in the GOP makes me question my belief in evolutionary adaptation.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
29. So was Lincoln. We forget that Republicans used to be the liberals, which is why liberal states lik
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:40 PM
Jan 2016

Massachusetts and Vermont used to be Republican. The remnant of conservatives never entirely left the Democratic Party. Now, they own it.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
31. Very well put. The hidden history of the Democratic Party.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:51 PM
Jan 2016

The reason that the US south went from solidly democratic to solidly Republican in a generation, with some politicians switching sides.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
43. Not hidden, so much as forgotten. I read an article recently that kept
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:39 PM
Jan 2016

referring to the FDR and the New Deal as the roots of the Party, as if the Democratic Party had first come into being circa 1930.

I think it's adorable that we claim to be the political heirs of Jefferson and Madison, but I think that's a political fairy tale. Andrew Jackson, however.....

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
38. Another unknown employee will likely be hung on a pole, and HRC will escape
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 07:26 PM
Jan 2016

She's smart and protects herself, always has a plausible denial ready...

Not so true for those who serve her, who on a good day only acquire an attorney's fee.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
39. The guy who pled the Fifth is still out there somewhere.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 08:52 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:41 PM - Edit history (1)

Also, as someone else pointed out, prosecution is very different for the peons than it is for the oligarchs, and the Clintons are oligarchs among oligarchs.

Duckfan

(1,268 posts)
49. Don't know name of radio news network
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 04:01 AM
Jan 2016

But heard this at dinner time while listening to Norman Goldman. Twice as a matter of fact. At 5 PM broadcast and 6.

At least someone is putting it out there.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
50. ASTOUNDING, right?
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 04:07 AM
Jan 2016

The Inspector General of the United States tells Congress that, in effect, a Democratic primary candidate for POTUS lied repeatedly to Americans about classified info not being on her server, Then, media holds the news until after the Democratic primary debate, breaks it and then pretty much ignores it. I recently "transitioned" from New Deal Democrat to Democratic Socialist, but bull puckey like this could zoom me into anarchist.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»ASTOUNDING