Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumASTOUNDING
how little I am hearing this morning about the letter of the Inspector General.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hillary-clinton-emails-contained-info-above-top-secret-ig-n499886
Instead, the talking heads have been babbling about polls!! Can you spell "corrupt media?"
draa
(975 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)draa
(975 posts)They certainly have their head up their ass if they're intentionally protecting her.
That would be worse that being willfully ignorant. But... it's what we've come to expect concerning the press.
merrily
(45,251 posts)draa
(975 posts)Just think though, it will make winning that much better if we can get it done.
PATRICK
(12,228 posts)she is getting protection from the Justice Department, maybe not ion GOP style but close. But whatever the merits of the case no one is going to fully take her down politically anymore than past scandals barely investigated affected GOP candidates like Romney in the past. Some goddawful criminals have been given the media pass before. Inherently useless as a social news forum for any country. Those who run the institutions escape scrutiny routinely. Brouhahas over falsehoods or non issues are insulting sideshows to fill the gaps.
It's almost moot what is going on. Accountability is whimsical, cynical or zero.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)then the ratings game will be on in full force.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Get her the nomination first, then drop the hammer on her.
sinkingfeeling
(51,438 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,129 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)malthaussen
(17,175 posts)I recollect reading somewhere-or-other that there is an increasing tendency to overclassify stuff to obfuscate things for the general public. You and I are not "allowed" to know what our government is doing, but for those at the top of the food chain, it is all one big game. Thus an offense that would mean ruin and imprisonment for a lesser being is disregarded when a "major player" commits it. This is seen time and again. Just yesterday, there was a thread that the Pentagon was thinking of taking away one whole star from General Petraeus for his little peccadillo of blabbing soi-disant "secrets." That is the extent of the punishment proposed for someone who committed a flagrant breach of security. Boo-hoo, he'll lose a few thousand in retirement pay every year.
You just don't understand that laws are for peasants, not aristocrats.
-- Mal
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)and HRH can become POTUS.
malthaussen
(17,175 posts)raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Too bad more of them don't take advantage of them. (We'll say nothing of conjectural interference with the results)
-- Mal
gordyfl
(598 posts)if she didn't try to side-step the Freedom Of Information Act. I think in the end, she may be accused of avoiding FOIA procedures, and some sort of obstruction.
That's my take.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)*cough cough* pay for play *cough cough* Clinton Foundation
If that is indeed the case then she doesnt only deserve NOT to ever hold a public office again, but she should see criminal charges.
I wonder when theyre going to give the public access to the evidence? Honestly this could be just more trumped up GOP bullshit but it seems like with the involvement of the IG its probably more than that. But her campaign is saying its much ado about nothing.
Lastly I watched the clip of Tapper asking her about whether the FBI has questioned her yet...Jesus if looks could kill!
merrily
(45,251 posts)news was held up until well after Sunday's debate!
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)He says good luck at the debate tonight at the end.
merrily
(45,251 posts)dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)In fact, the fix is in. Sorry Merrily, Im not not on their payroll...i just love these guys..
merrily
(45,251 posts)gordyfl
(598 posts)Since this campaign has begun, I'm trusting CNN less and less.
merrily
(45,251 posts)the Iraq War? Remember how many times media re-ran the video of the "Dean scream," often with an intro that implied, every so slightly, that he just might be mentally unstable?
senz
(11,945 posts)Thanks for this thread, merrily. I can't even put my thoughts/feelings into words at the moment. Something is SO rotten in the state of America. Somebody should turn on the garbage disposal and give the sink, and then the whole house, a good cleaning.
This is what power concentrations do: they rot.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Power corrupts.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dalberg-Acton,_1st_Baron_Acton
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Bill Clinton seems to have had a significant amount of power within the Democratic Party since he met Senator Fulbright while he (Clinton) was in high school, if not before. And, when he became the first Democratic President since FDR to be elected President more than once, the ballgame was pretty much over. (JMO, except for meeting Fulbright.)
As you know, when one of the national co-chairs of your 2008 Presidential campaign is head of the DNC when you run again, that ain't nutthin. Especially when said Chair was able to retain the position after doing a historically bad job at it.
senz
(11,945 posts)though at times I had my doubts about things he was doing. But now, having watched Hillary in 2008 and the present, I've been running a series of useless "what ifs" through my mind, like what if Gary Hart hadn't blown it in the 1980s? And what if California's Jerry Brown had run a better campaign in 1992? I've even wondered what would have happened if Ross Perot had won, b/c at least he was against NAFTA. It seems the Clintons were massively destructive to the Democratic Party. I have a feeling the country would be a better place if Bill hadn't captured the presidency to begin with.
merrily
(45,251 posts)with that.
IMO, it was not so much that he captured it, but that he was re-elected. His re-election marked the first time that a Democrat had been elected twice since FDR. Ergo, Democrats would win more, especially at the Presidential level, if they triangulated more. Politicians make a lot of such bare facts for the populace, but they don't stand up to examination. The devil and the angel of the truth is always in the details.
But the triangulators had money behind them, including Koch money. Liberals, bless them, seldom have the bucks on their side. In Lincoln's world, a liberal could win. In a world where 5 to 7 corporations control most news, it's ever so much harder.
senz
(11,945 posts)But then doesn't Obama, at least to some extent, disprove that theory? I realize he sometimes cooperated with tptb, but he's not chummy with the wealthy, as the Clintons are, and he keeps trying to do progressive things. I don't think he's as sold-out as the Clintons.
Good lord but I'm sleepy... hasta manana.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Shortly after his second election, Obama said that, in the 1980s, he would have been seen as a moderate Republican.
Clinton was the first Democratic President to run on ending welfare as we know it. Obama was the first Democratic President to pledge to "reform" entitlements, to talk about cutting Social Security and to put Social Security and Medicare on the table. He tried to extend the Iraq War past the date of the SOFA. He "surged" in Afghanistan. He implemented a no fly zone in Iraq, and so on.
senz
(11,945 posts)So glad you're here and on top of this, dorkzilla!
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Check in at 3pm - maybe it will get more than 30 seconds but I bet it will be the lede at 4 or whenever your local station airs ATC.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)They get her talking points, and that won't happen until the focus group is back.
I figure it will be lightly covered next week.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)mountain grammy
(26,598 posts)oh wait, they're talking about climate change, noooo, oh wait they're talking about government corruption, noooo. Oh yeah, there's Trump and Palin, 5 minutes.
I'm astounded every single day.
appalachiablue
(41,103 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)She's an embarrassment.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Or a decent number of debates prior to Super Tuesday would have been scheduled. And so on.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Given that 6 corporations control 90% of the US media, is there any wonder that the narrative ignores so much of what is happening?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Government should never have allowed news media to get into so few hands.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)How things have changed. The change in the GOP makes me question my belief in evolutionary adaptation.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Massachusetts and Vermont used to be Republican. The remnant of conservatives never entirely left the Democratic Party. Now, they own it.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)The reason that the US south went from solidly democratic to solidly Republican in a generation, with some politicians switching sides.
merrily
(45,251 posts)referring to the FDR and the New Deal as the roots of the Party, as if the Democratic Party had first come into being circa 1930.
I think it's adorable that we claim to be the political heirs of Jefferson and Madison, but I think that's a political fairy tale. Andrew Jackson, however.....
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)She's smart and protects herself, always has a plausible denial ready...
Not so true for those who serve her, who on a good day only acquire an attorney's fee.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 20, 2016, 09:41 PM - Edit history (1)
Also, as someone else pointed out, prosecution is very different for the peons than it is for the oligarchs, and the Clintons are oligarchs among oligarchs.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Heading to bed.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Duckfan
(1,268 posts)But heard this at dinner time while listening to Norman Goldman. Twice as a matter of fact. At 5 PM broadcast and 6.
At least someone is putting it out there.
merrily
(45,251 posts)The Inspector General of the United States tells Congress that, in effect, a Democratic primary candidate for POTUS lied repeatedly to Americans about classified info not being on her server, Then, media holds the news until after the Democratic primary debate, breaks it and then pretty much ignores it. I recently "transitioned" from New Deal Democrat to Democratic Socialist, but bull puckey like this could zoom me into anarchist.