Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
Mon May 6, 2019, 05:22 AM May 2019

Andrew Yang Policy on 18 YEAR TERM LIMIT FOR SUPREME COURT JUSTICES


Our country is facing a crisis in the judicial branch. Our Founding Fathers intended this third branch of government to be free of political pressures, interpreting and applying the Constitution to the laws passed by Congress in order to ensure that no violations were found.

Today, the Supreme Court is increasingly polarized around political lines, and the selection of a new Justice is a bitter fight that divides the country. The process has become increasingly contentious, and very few Americans believe that the Supreme Court is impartial.

The stats largely back up that they’re correct. The number of 5-4 decisions, reflecting the line between Republican-appointed and Democrat-appointed, has increased in recent years. When a new seat opens up, lifetime appointments incentivize finding the youngest, most partisan jurist who can gain confirmation in order to ensure a particular bent on the Court for as long as possible. Current Justices can expect to serve for 40 or more years. For historical context, the average Justice has served for 15 years, though Justices appointed since 1970 have served for an average of 26 years.

This isn’t the way it was envisioned at the founding of our country, when life expectancy was shorter and Justices would often retire or resign well ahead of their deaths. We need to return some level of sanity and balance to the Supreme Court.

https://www.yang2020.com/policies/scotustermlimits/
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Andrew Yang Policy on 18 YEAR TERM LIMIT FOR SUPREME COURT JUSTICES (Original Post) Sherman A1 May 2019 OP
he makes a lot of sense Skittles May 2019 #1
It's a good idea rpannier May 2019 #2
Something has to be done. 47of74 May 2019 #3
8 year term limit just like the President. democratisphere May 2019 #4
I think this is the best idea any candidate has come up with. But even 18 seems a little long. Autumn May 2019 #5
16 years - that's a generation crazytown May 2019 #6
I always thought 27 years was a generation Sherman A1 May 2019 #7
I thought was baby to birth. crazytown May 2019 #8
Well, Sherman A1 May 2019 #9
Whether it will return sanity and balance is unknown, brer cat May 2019 #10
 

Skittles

(153,150 posts)
1. he makes a lot of sense
Mon May 6, 2019, 06:19 AM
May 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
2. It's a good idea
Mon May 6, 2019, 07:07 AM
May 2019

Even the jackswine Ted Cruz thinks 20 should be the limit
I've seen in several places where the feeling is, there would be less partisan bickering over nominees because they couldn't dig their fingers in and stay

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

47of74

(18,470 posts)
3. Something has to be done.
Mon May 6, 2019, 07:55 AM
May 2019

What he didn’t address though is the problem of people like Mitch McFuckstick who will sabotage the process in order to ensure people like Kavadouche get put in.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)
4. 8 year term limit just like the President.
Mon May 6, 2019, 07:59 AM
May 2019

Absolute life long power corrupts absolutely, specially when rethuglicons are involved.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Autumn

(45,062 posts)
5. I think this is the best idea any candidate has come up with. But even 18 seems a little long.
Mon May 6, 2019, 08:01 AM
May 2019

Rec

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

crazytown

(7,277 posts)
6. 16 years - that's a generation
Mon May 6, 2019, 08:08 AM
May 2019

and syncs with the political cycle.

For every Stevens and RBG , they lose a Rehnquist, Scalia and Thomas.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
7. I always thought 27 years was a generation
Mon May 6, 2019, 08:18 AM
May 2019

but that might be my genealogy interests speaking. Nevertheless the point is a moot one and 16 or 18 years is much better than the current circumstances.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

crazytown

(7,277 posts)
8. I thought was baby to birth.
Mon May 6, 2019, 08:22 AM
May 2019

But I think you are right:

the average period, generally considered to be about thirty years, during which children are born and grow up, become adults

Anyway.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
9. Well,
Mon May 6, 2019, 08:28 AM
May 2019

Most become adults, others as a few in the wife's family struggle with doing such, but we all know they are in every family........

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

brer cat

(24,560 posts)
10. Whether it will return sanity and balance is unknown,
Mon May 6, 2019, 08:29 AM
May 2019

but term limits is still a positive step.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Andrew Yang Policy on 18 ...