Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
Sun May 19, 2019, 05:47 AM May 2019

Andrew Yang Policy on EVERY COP GETS A CAMERA


The benefits of body cameras on police officers are clear: A YEAR-LONG STUDY in Rialto, California showed a reduction of the rate of use-of-force incidents of 60% and an 88% reduction in complaints. Studies have shown that complaints drop dramatically when police officers are wearing cameras, both because of police conduct and because suspects behave better when they know they’re being recorded. It’s common sense. Everyone is going to act differently if they think what they’re saying or doing can be played back in a courtroom months later.

There are 18,000 different local law enforcement agencies, from the smallest town’s to the NYPD. Each agency is subject to its own budget, leadership, and regulations. Nationally, there are thousands of decision makers each balancing different interests and budgetary constraints, making widespread adoption difficult.

It would cost approximately $400 million to equip all 1.1 million US police officers with body-worn cameras (current costs are approximately $350 apiece, not including data storage costs and maintenance).

Approximately 400 to 1,000 Americans get shot and killed per year by police (the stats aren’t clearly kept, which is its OWN MASSIVE PROBLEM), some of which may be avoidable. Additionally, police departments receive thousands of complaints and lawsuits per year. Cameras would save many municipalities money by reducing legal costs defending against complaints, from the frivolous to the legitimate. This expense line is massive—the NYPD spent $136 million ON LEGAL SETTLEMENTS FOR complaints about police misconduct in 2010 alone. If cameras reduced this amount by any percentage they’d easily pay for themselves. The same is true for other cities around the country. Cameras would not only save lives and reduce incidents but they’d save cities millions in legal costs.

As one company that manufactures cameras puts it: “Made for cops by cops. Prove the truth.”

"Police officers do a dangerous job every day and deserve our support. Having a camera will help both the public and the police officer resolve complaints. It’s the 21st century and it’s now possible to equip police officers with more advanced equipment than ever before. We should invest in making our police officers as effective as possible while truly being servants and protectors of the communities they serve."

https://www.yang2020.com/policies/every-cop-gets-camera/
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Andrew Yang Policy on EVERY COP GETS A CAMERA (Original Post) Sherman A1 May 2019 OP
Cops need cameras period. Blues Heron May 2019 #1
 

Blues Heron

(5,931 posts)
1. Cops need cameras period.
Sun May 19, 2019, 07:15 AM
May 2019

If they turn off their camera for any reason, instant termination with no pension.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Andrew Yang Policy on EVE...