While teaching, Elizabeth Warren worked on more than 50 legal matters, charging as much as $675 an

[demmiblue]

Sen. Elizabeth Warren worked on more than 50 legal matters during her career as a professor at Ivy League law schools, charging as much as $675 an hour to advise a variety of clients, from people with asbestos disease to a corporation facing possible liability over ruptured breast implants.

Warren’s presidential campaign released a list of 56 cases on her website on Wednesday night, revealing a far higher number of cases than Warren (D-Mass.) had previously disclosed and lending detail to an aspect of her career that she rarely discusses in public.

When she first ran for the Senate in 2012, Warren came under pressure from her Republican opponent and the news media to discuss her legal work. At the time, she released a list of just 13 cases without saying whether it represented a full accounting; at least one other case came to light during the race.

“Elizabeth was one of the nation’s top experts on how to make sure victims hurt by bankrupt companies eventually got paid,” Warren’s website said Wednesday night. “Throughout her career, she worked to help set up trusts and other mechanisms to return $27 billion to victims and their families.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/while-teaching-elizabeth-warren-worked-on-more-than-50-legal-matters-charging-as-much-as-675-an-hour/2019/05/22/9ce56840-7ce0-11e9-8bb7-0fc796cf2ec0_story.html

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

[BeyondGeography]

1. Bezos really doesn't like Warren's plans for Amazon

This won't hurt her in the least, Jeff. Try harder.

[Ponietz]

26. +1

[madaboutharry]

2. I don't get the problem here.

Was she suppose to work for free?

It seems to me that some people have a problem with women who make their own money.

[Ninga]

3. Read. Understand. Research. Let's not eat our own in the name of competition. Nt

[demmiblue]

8. Who's eating our own?

The article is getting completely ratioed on Twitter.

[Ninga]

10. I'm not sure what that means. No one is raising eyebrows here. But in my experience someone

surely will.

[demmiblue]

11. Ah, I see.

And you're probably right.

[Celerity]

17. ratioed means more replies than retweets or likes, with most of the replies being negative nt

[Ninga]

25. Got it. I'm not familiar with Twitter lexicon.

[BannonsLiver]

38. You're lucky. Twitter is a sewer.

[Partisan D]

4. Meh.

This is nothing. Yawn.

[ananda]

13. Agree.

Yawn.

I like Warren.

[Partisan D]

18. Supporters, I think, follow the lead of their candidate.

Joe made it clear he's not slinging mud at any other Democrat. I will follow Joe's lead.

[jberryhill]

5. Too funny

Accomplished leading attorney in the field was paid market rate for work.

In other news, water is wet.

Is this "news" because she is a woman or something?

[PatrickforO]

6. And that's bad how?

Gosh, a law professor earning extra money by taking cases on the side! Oh, the humanity!

[dalton99a]

7. Yeah, wasn't she supposed to charge corporations $6.75 an hour?

[monmouth4]

9. All this says is that she is brilliant and is able to do more than one thing at a time. Double,

triple tasking is a great thing. You go Liz.

[watoos]

12. I haven't decided on a candidate yet,

but her agenda and platform are closest to mine. I am liking her more and more.

Yes, I sport Tulsi's pic, I do so to defend her.

[dlk]

14. Why Can't a Woman Earn Money in a Professional Capacity?

This echoes the complaints about Hillary's "outrageous" speaking fees. Funny, it's never an issue when a man earns money.

[wyldwolf]

15. If this is a bad thing...

... then I am completely out of touch with how a good 'progressive' is supposed to behave.

[TexasTowelie]

16. The only question that I would have

is whether billing her time while she was also "on the clock" with the law school of if she was taking an adversarial role to the law school's interests. Otherwise, I believe that she is welcome to get paid whatever the market will bear.

[LisaM]

28. Very unlikely.

Many law professors are also in current practice, and law firms do rigorous checks for conflicts of interest under ethics rules. I find is almost impossible to think that Warren wouldn't have conformed to the highest ethical standards.

[TexasTowelie]

30. I doubt it also.

However, if she wasn't working for a law firm there wouldn't be anyone there to check for a conflict of interest.

[jberryhill]

48. She's not an attorney for the school

The notion that there could be a conflict of interest between her and the school is absurd.

She's already an employee of the school, and thus inherently in a position of conflict because she and the school are on opposite sides of her employment contract. You want to see a clusterfuck sometime, then watch a group of law professors negotiate their working conditions with a law school. Hooo boy.

If she wanted to represent a party with a claim against the school, there would still be no conflict of interest. In fact, in regard to the relationship between faculty and the institution, there is ordinarily at least one faculty member who is the elected representative of the faculty in faculty/school matters. (e.g. https://www.wlu.edu/provosts-office/resources-for-faculty/committees/permanent-committees/faculty-representatives-to-the-board-of-trustees )

Law schools EXPECT professors to be publishing or consulting on actual litigation. The most frequent practice is drafting appellate briefs.

This story might as well be titled "Anteater Found Eating Ants". It is that fucking stupid. A law professor practicing law does not raise any interesting questions, ethical or otherwise.

This may come as a shock to some, but engineering schools expect professors to be doing engineering, medical schools expect professors to be doing medicine, and law schools expect professors to be doing law.

[HopeAgain]

40. Irrelevant questions, actually

Law Professors aren't paid as hourly employees and most do things on the side like part time practices, writing and publishing. That is not only accepted, but encouraged where it lends some prestige or gravitas to the school. As long as they fulfill their duties, the school doesn't care what they do with the remainder of their time.

As for conflicts, it's pretty unlikely that there was any issue since 50 is a tiny number of cases. Plus, why raise it since it could be a "question" for any lawyer who takes any case at any time?

[comradebillyboy]

42. I'd imagine those matters were addressed in her employment contract

with Harvard.

[Celerity]

19. shameful 'crab in the barrel' hitjob by the two female reporters, Elise Viebeck and Annie Linskey

Bezos is truly worried.

[Brainstormy]

20. so the fuck what? n/t

[HopeAgain]

21. Makes her look only better

So she could easily make much, much more money, but chooses to serve the public, especially the poor and underserved, instead.

Makes me love her more...

[pangaia]

22. Not about Warren, goodness, there are way richer people walking around.

But it just reminds me of the difference between the top 1% or .1%... and me and the rest of us.

It's a depressing way to start the day.

[bluedigger]

23. You mean Harvard Law professors don't work cheap?

Almost destroys my belief in supply & demand. Good for her!

[elias7]

24. Article uniformly trashed in the comments section

[Polly Hennessey]

27. Sounds good to me.

Most teachers have second jobs/moonlight.

[centrarchus]

29. No news "new". So what.

[Voltaire2]

31. Wow. She must have been a freaking great lawyer.

I'm impressed.

Wait, that wasn't your intention with this op?

[mcar]

32. Good for her

[WhiskeyGrinder]

33. Why so low?

[Kahuna7]

34. Good for her. This is what is called a lead balloon. nt

[matt819]

35. So?

This sure is a non-story.

Lots of professors do work on the side. They publish books. They consult. If the market says that their rate is $675/hour, so be it. How much is the buffoon-in-chief paying his personal lawyers? I doubt they're billing at anything less than $750 per hour.

[Blue_Tires]

36. LOL

Link to tweet

[Blue_Tires]

37. Good question!

Link to tweet

[NYMinute]

39. $675/hr is cheap for her caliber

Similar lawyers charge between $1500 to $3000/hr

Also, SHE disclosed this and I have no problem with it whatsoever.

[Tarheel_Dem]

41. Who cares?

[Shrek]

43. She probably didn't personally collect that much

Surely some of that goes to pay for overhead like office expenses, paralegals, office staff, and so on.

[madville]

44. She helped defend a corporation that sold faulty

Breast implants to women? That's the only thing that looks interesting, everything else seems trivial.

[Recursion]

47. Even shitty people deserve lawyers

And if she found a valid procedural protection for them, well, that was her job.

[Vinca]

45. Good for her. If it was ok with her employer, I don't really care.

[Recursion]

46. Four years ago, otherwise intelligent people convinced themselves there was an ethical problem

with working the lecture circuit. It's starting again.