Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

brooklynite

(94,501 posts)
Wed Aug 7, 2019, 11:31 AM Aug 2019

John Hickenlooper: 'My fellow Democratic candidates are falling for Trump's distractions. I'm not'

Miami Herald

The clashes over immigration in the presidential debates may make for good television, but they don’t make good policy. The way in which most of my competitors for the Democratic nomination have approached the issue of immigration is contrary to both common sense and the goal of achieving meaningful reform. This is an unfortunate pattern on a range of issues that, if continued, could hand the worst president in our nation’s history a second term in office.

A new term has been introduced into the popular lexicon. “Section 1325,” now one of the better known provisions of Title 8 of the U.S. Code, provides that unauthorized entry into the United States is a crime. Most of my fellow Democratic candidates for president have followed Julian Castro’s lead in saying that Section 1325 should be repealed. While their intentions for taking this position are admirable, their logic leaves much to be desired. This may be where the perspective of the only candidate in the race who has served as both a mayor and governor is different from that of a legislator.

Members of Congress deliver speeches and lend their names to legislation; governors have to deliver results and solve problems. It’s a fundamentally different approach. Senators and representatives measure their progress by “outputs” — bills filed or enacted, points scored in a debate. As governors, we define success differently, focusing on outcomes. And those outcomes almost always require a combination of policy, politics, relentless implementation and coalition building.

Let me discuss that last one, coalition building. Defining the important issue of immigration in terms of Section 1325 not only is largely a distraction, it also is counter-productive. It ignores the need to rally the majority of Americans who support a humane immigration policy around common-sense immigration reform.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Hickenlooper: 'My fellow Democratic candidates are falling for Trump's distractions. I'm not' (Original Post) brooklynite Aug 2019 OP
Then run for Senate John help narrow the field and stop waisting resources. gordianot Aug 2019 #1
Then run for Senate, because you're currently polling at 0 percent. bearsfootball516 Aug 2019 #2
You're still in my bottom tier. That's being generous. 50 Shades Of Blue Aug 2019 #3
 

gordianot

(15,237 posts)
1. Then run for Senate John help narrow the field and stop waisting resources.
Wed Aug 7, 2019, 11:35 AM
Aug 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

bearsfootball516

(6,377 posts)
2. Then run for Senate, because you're currently polling at 0 percent.
Wed Aug 7, 2019, 11:46 AM
Aug 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

50 Shades Of Blue

(9,975 posts)
3. You're still in my bottom tier. That's being generous.
Wed Aug 7, 2019, 11:49 AM
Aug 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»John Hickenlooper: 'My fe...