Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

appalachiablue

(41,102 posts)
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 06:44 PM Nov 2019

Warren: Corporate Media Should Ask Working People About Her Wealth Tax, Not Just The Very Rich

'Warren Suggests Corporate Media Ask Working People, Not Just the Very Rich, About Her Wealth Tax.' "Okay, I get it, we have now done the billionaires. How many of the 43 million Americans who are struggling with student loan debt have you seen interviewed?" The Guardian, Nov. 14, 2019.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren on Wednesday evening called out the news media for focusing their coverage of her proposed Ultra-Millionaires Tax largely on wealthy CEOs' and investors' negative views of the plan rather than those of the working families the senator says would benefit from the redistribution of wealth.

At a town hall attended by 200 SEIU members in Concord, New Hampshire, Warren asked the crowd, "How many billionaires have you seen interviewed in just the last week about this wealth tax?"

"Okay, I get it, we have now done the billionaires," she continued. "How many of the 43 million Americans who are struggling with student loan debt have you seen interviewed?"

(Watch: Video in Tweet)



-- Sen. Warren speaks to state employees in Concord, New Hampshire, Nov.13, 2019.

Warren's comments followed her campaign's release of an ad Wednesday targeting powerful political donors like Goldman Sachs chairman Lloyd Blankfein, investor Leon Cooperman, and Trump contributor Peter Thiel—all of whom have been given significant airtime by cable news networks to decry Warren's plan to tax all household assets over $50 million at 2% per year.

Last week, Microsoft founder Bill Gates's well-publicized comments about Warren's proposal inspired the Massachusetts Democrat to add a page to her website showing Gates, Cooperman, and potential 2020 presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg exactly how much they would pay under her plan.

"How many of the people who are struggling to pay childcare around this country have you seen interviewed?" Warren asked Wednesday. "How many of the teachers who are working second and third jobs to try to make ends meet and try to pay off their student loans have you seen interviewed?"

"I am sick of an America that works for the billionaires and doesn't work for anyone else," she added.

Warren's point on Wednesday echoed a remark made by author Anand Giridharadas earlier this week...

More, https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/11/14/warren-suggests-corporate-media-ask-working-people-not-just-very-rich-about-her

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warren: Corporate Media Should Ask Working People About Her Wealth Tax, Not Just The Very Rich (Original Post) appalachiablue Nov 2019 OP
They don't want positivity toward Warren. Funtatlaguy Nov 2019 #1
That wasn't the only punch she threw BeyondGeography Nov 2019 #2
+1 Bingo BeckyDem Nov 2019 #14
Media has asked them, and despite Warren's promise to make wealthy Hoyt Nov 2019 #3
Wealth tax polls at 60-70 percent BeyondGeography Nov 2019 #5
Does that really surprise you, having someone else pay? Hoyt Nov 2019 #6
Got any links to prove they have asked them? Bradshaw3 Nov 2019 #8
But they work for the rich. It's right there in the expression "Corporate Media" FiveGoodMen Nov 2019 #4
the media and the sad reality BannonsLiver Nov 2019 #10
This issue of inequality started much earlier than now Unclephil Nov 2019 #7
Kick. zentrum Nov 2019 #9
K&R nt backtoblue Nov 2019 #11
K&R! BlueMTexpat Nov 2019 #12
Yeah they should. But they won't. redqueen Nov 2019 #13
 

Funtatlaguy

(10,862 posts)
1. They don't want positivity toward Warren.
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 06:55 PM
Nov 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
3. Media has asked them, and despite Warren's promise to make wealthy
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 07:00 PM
Nov 2019

and corporations pay for healthcare, people are still skeptical of her MFA plan.

There are better ways to tax wealthy including hefty estate taxes, raising tax rates including capital gain rates, etc. The economist she’s been bandying around — Zandi — says the same thing, plus he does not support MFA.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

BeyondGeography

(39,339 posts)
5. Wealth tax polls at 60-70 percent
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 07:05 PM
Nov 2019

Including half of Republicans in this WaPo poll earlier this year:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2019/02/05/over-percent-voters-including-half-republicans-support-elizabeth-warrens-wealth-tax/

The wealth tax would be her first priority because it would help people immediately. MFA would be dealt with separately. But feel free to thread hijack with MFA.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
6. Does that really surprise you, having someone else pay?
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 07:09 PM
Nov 2019

Yet, MFA isn’t that popular. Now, that’s surprising.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Bradshaw3

(7,484 posts)
8. Got any links to prove they have asked them?
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 07:32 PM
Nov 2019

Or are you just making it up? I haven't seen those types of interivews.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
4. But they work for the rich. It's right there in the expression "Corporate Media"
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 07:04 PM
Nov 2019

The problem is that the news isn't there to help us.

It's there to help them screw us.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

BannonsLiver

(16,282 posts)
10. the media and the sad reality
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 08:00 PM
Nov 2019

That generations of Americans have been conditioned to envy the rich and view them as benevolent “job creators.”

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard “yeah they’re rich and don’t pay taxes but they create a lot of jobs” from otherwise reasonable people.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Unclephil

(92 posts)
7. This issue of inequality started much earlier than now
Thu Nov 14, 2019, 07:22 PM
Nov 2019

I think it was part of part of supply side economics. All I know is I didn't vote for Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Reagan, Bush and Bush again.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

redqueen

(115,096 posts)
13. Yeah they should. But they won't.
Fri Nov 15, 2019, 08:55 AM
Nov 2019

Wonder if other candidates' supporters have started mocking her with taunts about whining. This can be a silly place.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Warren: Corporate Media S...