Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Democratic Primaries
Related: About this forum
Congratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 710 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
📣 BREAKING: @DFAaction is endorsing @BernieSanders for President (Original Post)
Donkees
Mar 2020
OP
Really? I didn't see that coming...I usually do the opposite of what they suggest...
Demsrule86
Mar 2020
#3
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
primary today, I would vote for: Undecided
blm
(113,040 posts)2. AllTalkNoAction has its audience.
Ill take competence and action that equals results.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)3. Really? I didn't see that coming...I usually do the opposite of what they suggest...
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
AGeddy
(509 posts)4. Alternate Headline: Candidate who swears off dark money PACs gets endorsed by a dark money PAC
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)6. AP: Shadow group provides Sanders super PAC support he scorns
https://apnews.com/345bbd1af529cfb1e41305fa3ab1e604
Shadow group provides Sanders super PAC support he scorns
By BRIAN SLODYSKO January 7, 2020
WASHINGTON (AP) Bernie Sanders says he doesnt want a super PAC. Instead, he has Our Revolution, a nonprofit political organization he founded that functions much the same as one.
Like a super PAC, which is shorthand for super political action committee, Our Revolution can raise unlimited sums from wealthy patrons that dwarf the limits faced by candidates and conventional PACs. Unlike a super PAC, however, the group doesnt have to disclose its donors a stream of revenue commonly referred to as dark money.
Now, with less than one month to go before the Iowa caucuses, Our Revolution appears to be skirting campaign finance law, which forbids groups founded by federal candidates and officeholders from using large donations to finance federal election activity, including Sanders 2020 bid.
...
But while Warren has come under fire for courting wealthy financiers in her past Senate campaigns, Sanders and Our Revolution have largely avoided scrutiny during the primary, even as he has accelerated his criticism of others, among them Biden, for relying on super PACs founded by their allies.
In the case of Our Revolution, which aims to boost voter turnout for Sanders, the Vermont senator was the founder.
As recently as last week, Sanders continued his criticism. I do not have a super PAC in which billionaires make contributions, Sanders said during a town hall in Anamosa, Iowa. I dont want a super PAC because our campaign and administration is there to represent working families, not the wealthy.
The campaign finance act says groups directly or indirectly established by federal officeholders or candidates cant solicit, receive, direct, transfer, or spend funds for federal electoral activity that exceeds the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of the law. Those limits are currently set at $2,800 for candidates and $5,000 for political action committees.
Our Revolution has taken in nearly $1 million from donors who gave more than the limits and whose identities it hasnt fully disclosed, according to tax filings for 2016, 2017 and 2018. Much of it came from those who contributed six-figure sums.
It wont have to publicly reveal its 2019 fundraising until after this years presidential election. And money it raises between now and then wont have to be disclosed until the following year.
Any entity established by a federal officeholder can only raise and spend money under federal contribution limits for any activities in connection with a federal election, said Paul S. Ryan, a campaign finance expert and attorney with the good-government group Common Cause. Our Revolution was undoubtedly established by Sen. Sanders, is subject to these laws and is seemingly in violation of them.
...
Yet the group, which takes its name from a book written by Sanders, was beset by turmoil almost from the start with about a dozen leaving in protest. Our Revolutions willingness to accept money from undisclosed donors, which some saw as anathema to Sanders message of campaign finance reform, was one of the reasons for the exodus, according to a former staffer who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal dynamics.
Sanders has ripped groups on the right in the past for plunging money into the political system without disclosure. In 2016, he also attacked Democratic rival Hillary Clinton for accepting help from super PACs.
His website includes a detailed plan to get corporate money out of politics that calls for aggressive enforcement of campaign finance laws and an end to political spending by nonprofit groups like Our Revolution who accept unlimited contributions or do not disclose donors.
Yet in September, he joined an organization-wide conference call celebrating Our Revolutions third anniversary and thanked the group for doing some of the most important work that can be done in our country.
Our Revolution has touted its transparency in the past. It formerly disclosed the names of contributors on its website, though it did not list the amounts they gave and also masked donors identities at their request. But after the first three months of last year, Our Revolution has not updated the list. The group says it will restart the practice soon after launching a new website.
Its not certain that the Federal Election Commission will consider Our Revolutions fundraising practices a violation. The FEC, which has wide latitude to interpret the law, has ruled in the past that similar groups founded by federal officeholders are limited to accepting contributions of $5,000 or less.
...
Shadow group provides Sanders super PAC support he scorns
By BRIAN SLODYSKO January 7, 2020
WASHINGTON (AP) Bernie Sanders says he doesnt want a super PAC. Instead, he has Our Revolution, a nonprofit political organization he founded that functions much the same as one.
Like a super PAC, which is shorthand for super political action committee, Our Revolution can raise unlimited sums from wealthy patrons that dwarf the limits faced by candidates and conventional PACs. Unlike a super PAC, however, the group doesnt have to disclose its donors a stream of revenue commonly referred to as dark money.
Now, with less than one month to go before the Iowa caucuses, Our Revolution appears to be skirting campaign finance law, which forbids groups founded by federal candidates and officeholders from using large donations to finance federal election activity, including Sanders 2020 bid.
...
But while Warren has come under fire for courting wealthy financiers in her past Senate campaigns, Sanders and Our Revolution have largely avoided scrutiny during the primary, even as he has accelerated his criticism of others, among them Biden, for relying on super PACs founded by their allies.
In the case of Our Revolution, which aims to boost voter turnout for Sanders, the Vermont senator was the founder.
As recently as last week, Sanders continued his criticism. I do not have a super PAC in which billionaires make contributions, Sanders said during a town hall in Anamosa, Iowa. I dont want a super PAC because our campaign and administration is there to represent working families, not the wealthy.
The campaign finance act says groups directly or indirectly established by federal officeholders or candidates cant solicit, receive, direct, transfer, or spend funds for federal electoral activity that exceeds the limitations, prohibitions, and reporting requirements of the law. Those limits are currently set at $2,800 for candidates and $5,000 for political action committees.
Our Revolution has taken in nearly $1 million from donors who gave more than the limits and whose identities it hasnt fully disclosed, according to tax filings for 2016, 2017 and 2018. Much of it came from those who contributed six-figure sums.
It wont have to publicly reveal its 2019 fundraising until after this years presidential election. And money it raises between now and then wont have to be disclosed until the following year.
Any entity established by a federal officeholder can only raise and spend money under federal contribution limits for any activities in connection with a federal election, said Paul S. Ryan, a campaign finance expert and attorney with the good-government group Common Cause. Our Revolution was undoubtedly established by Sen. Sanders, is subject to these laws and is seemingly in violation of them.
...
Yet the group, which takes its name from a book written by Sanders, was beset by turmoil almost from the start with about a dozen leaving in protest. Our Revolutions willingness to accept money from undisclosed donors, which some saw as anathema to Sanders message of campaign finance reform, was one of the reasons for the exodus, according to a former staffer who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal dynamics.
Sanders has ripped groups on the right in the past for plunging money into the political system without disclosure. In 2016, he also attacked Democratic rival Hillary Clinton for accepting help from super PACs.
His website includes a detailed plan to get corporate money out of politics that calls for aggressive enforcement of campaign finance laws and an end to political spending by nonprofit groups like Our Revolution who accept unlimited contributions or do not disclose donors.
Yet in September, he joined an organization-wide conference call celebrating Our Revolutions third anniversary and thanked the group for doing some of the most important work that can be done in our country.
Our Revolution has touted its transparency in the past. It formerly disclosed the names of contributors on its website, though it did not list the amounts they gave and also masked donors identities at their request. But after the first three months of last year, Our Revolution has not updated the list. The group says it will restart the practice soon after launching a new website.
Its not certain that the Federal Election Commission will consider Our Revolutions fundraising practices a violation. The FEC, which has wide latitude to interpret the law, has ruled in the past that similar groups founded by federal officeholders are limited to accepting contributions of $5,000 or less.
...
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
Me.
(35,454 posts)7. Hypocrisy & Shenanigans All Over The Place
Not exactly a revolution as the Cons already are experts at this
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
evertonfc
(1,713 posts)5. another reason not to support Sanders
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden
primary today, I would vote for: Joe Biden