Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
cal04
cal04's Journal
cal04's Journal
May 27, 2015
Bernie Sanders held his first major presidential campaign event in Vermont yesterday afternoon after kicking off his 2016 bid with a delightfully offbeat Capitol Hill press conference. The tone of the coverage surrounding Sanders campaign doesnt necessarily reflect it, but Vermonts independent senator is actually pulling in a decent share of the Democratic vote. As of this writing, his support in national polling has climbed up into double digits, and the last few polls out of Iowa and New Hampshire put him at around 14 or 15 percent in those states. Of course, those numbers have to be measured against those of his chief rival, Hillary Clinton, who dominates both nationally and in the early states with more than 50 percent.
So Sanders is a long shot, but hes not without a sizable bloc of support. In fact, when you crunch the numbers, Sanders is outperforming the combined support of several GOP presidential wannabes. The Bernie 2016 boomlet is clearly a bit puzzling to reporters, who dont seem to know what to do with Sanders beyond treating him as a foil to Hillary, and so they default to doing nothing, even as every utterance of GOP candidates who are polling below 2 percent merits its own headline. There are clear double standards at play, and one of them pertains to how reporters cover a candidate who is unreservedly liberal versus how they cover proudly conservative Republicans. This dynamic is sometimes subtle, and it emerged during an interview Sanders gave with CNBCs John Harwood.
(snip)
This is what happens after more than three decades of economic policymaking that has enshrined tax cuts as the greatest good one can strive for. For Republicans, the policy is tax cuts everywhere and always and most especially for the rich. For Democrats, its tax cuts for the middle class while the wealthy, who benefit disproportionately from a tax structure that is barely progressive, are asked only to pay a little more. Weve become so accustomed to historically low rates of taxation for the wealthy that when someone like Sanders comes along and says the rich can and should pay a far higher rate, people assume hes out to lunch.
But is a 90 percent top rate obviously too high? Is it something one should instinctively flinch at? Not really, says Bryce Covert:
http://www.salon.com/2015/05/27/the_medias_sickening_sanders_double_standard_how_the_socialist_brings_out_their_true_colors/
The media’s sickening Sanders double standard: How the socialist brings out their true colors
Bernie Sanders' 2016 campaign reveals how skewed our attitudes toward wealth and taxation have becomeBernie Sanders held his first major presidential campaign event in Vermont yesterday afternoon after kicking off his 2016 bid with a delightfully offbeat Capitol Hill press conference. The tone of the coverage surrounding Sanders campaign doesnt necessarily reflect it, but Vermonts independent senator is actually pulling in a decent share of the Democratic vote. As of this writing, his support in national polling has climbed up into double digits, and the last few polls out of Iowa and New Hampshire put him at around 14 or 15 percent in those states. Of course, those numbers have to be measured against those of his chief rival, Hillary Clinton, who dominates both nationally and in the early states with more than 50 percent.
So Sanders is a long shot, but hes not without a sizable bloc of support. In fact, when you crunch the numbers, Sanders is outperforming the combined support of several GOP presidential wannabes. The Bernie 2016 boomlet is clearly a bit puzzling to reporters, who dont seem to know what to do with Sanders beyond treating him as a foil to Hillary, and so they default to doing nothing, even as every utterance of GOP candidates who are polling below 2 percent merits its own headline. There are clear double standards at play, and one of them pertains to how reporters cover a candidate who is unreservedly liberal versus how they cover proudly conservative Republicans. This dynamic is sometimes subtle, and it emerged during an interview Sanders gave with CNBCs John Harwood.
(snip)
This is what happens after more than three decades of economic policymaking that has enshrined tax cuts as the greatest good one can strive for. For Republicans, the policy is tax cuts everywhere and always and most especially for the rich. For Democrats, its tax cuts for the middle class while the wealthy, who benefit disproportionately from a tax structure that is barely progressive, are asked only to pay a little more. Weve become so accustomed to historically low rates of taxation for the wealthy that when someone like Sanders comes along and says the rich can and should pay a far higher rate, people assume hes out to lunch.
But is a 90 percent top rate obviously too high? Is it something one should instinctively flinch at? Not really, says Bryce Covert:
http://www.salon.com/2015/05/27/the_medias_sickening_sanders_double_standard_how_the_socialist_brings_out_their_true_colors/
May 27, 2015
https://twitter.com/hashtag/FeelTheBern?src=hash
ttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/CF-FEZ2UgAAx8kW.jpg
https://twitter.com/NEforBernie2016
"The agenda begins with job, jobs, and more jobs."
https://twitter.com/People4Bernie
It is better to show up than to give up.
https://twitter.com/SenSanders
Feel The Bern
https://twitter.com/hashtag/FeelTheBern?src=hash
ttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/CF-FEZ2UgAAx8kW.jpg
https://twitter.com/NEforBernie2016
"The agenda begins with job, jobs, and more jobs."
https://twitter.com/People4Bernie
It is better to show up than to give up.
https://twitter.com/SenSanders
May 26, 2015
https://twitter.com/NicholsUprising
Bernie Sanders signs are everywhere as Burlington VT prepares for presidential announcement party.
https://twitter.com/NicholsUprising
May 23, 2015
WASHINGTON, May 22 Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) issued the following statement tonight after the Senate voted 62-37 for a bill that would grant President Barack Obama accelerated power to complete a massive trade accord with 11 other Pacific Rim nations:
The Senate just put the interests of powerful multi-national corporations, drug companies and Wall Street ahead of the needs of American workers. If this disastrous trade agreement is approved, it will throw Americans out of work while companies continue moving operations and good-paying jobs to low-wage countries overseas.
Bad trade deals like the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership are a major reason for the collapse of the American middle class and the increase in wealth and income inequality in the United States. This agreement, like bad trade deals before it, would force American workers to compete with desperate workers around the world including workers in Vietnam where the minimum wage is 56-cents an hour.
Trade agreements should not just work for corporate America, Wall Street and the pharmaceutical industry. They have got to benefit the working families of our country, Sanders said.
Sen.Sanders Statement on Senate Vote on Job-Killing Trade Bill
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-statement-on-senate-vote-on-job-killing-trade-billWASHINGTON, May 22 Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) issued the following statement tonight after the Senate voted 62-37 for a bill that would grant President Barack Obama accelerated power to complete a massive trade accord with 11 other Pacific Rim nations:
The Senate just put the interests of powerful multi-national corporations, drug companies and Wall Street ahead of the needs of American workers. If this disastrous trade agreement is approved, it will throw Americans out of work while companies continue moving operations and good-paying jobs to low-wage countries overseas.
Bad trade deals like the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership are a major reason for the collapse of the American middle class and the increase in wealth and income inequality in the United States. This agreement, like bad trade deals before it, would force American workers to compete with desperate workers around the world including workers in Vietnam where the minimum wage is 56-cents an hour.
Trade agreements should not just work for corporate America, Wall Street and the pharmaceutical industry. They have got to benefit the working families of our country, Sanders said.
Profile Information
Member since: Tue Jan 6, 2004, 01:46 PMNumber of posts: 41,505